On June 22, 2010 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cathay Bank, A California Banking Corporation,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
and
Does 1 Through 200, Inclusive,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
IMAC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Oct-26-2012 4:42 pm
Case Number: CGC-10-500934
Filing Date: Oct-26-2012 4:41
Filed by: JACQUELINE ALAMEDA
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03819721
ORDER
CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS. RAYMOND
XIANG ZHANG et al
0010603819721
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.cutee associates, RE
1440 BROADWAY
SUME 1000
OAKLAND CA SsE12
#910) 832-1686
Chijeh Hu (SBN 241271)
CJH & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
1440 Broadway, Suite 1000 D
Oakland, CA 94612 San Francisco County Superior Court
Telephone: (510) 832-1686
Fax: (510) 251-1155 OCT 26 2012
Attorney for Defendants/Cross Complainants, CLERK OF THE COURT
RAYMOND ZHANG, et al. BY: hernat
ope
- Sepury Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CATHAY BANK, a California banking CASE NO: CGC- 10 - 500934
Corporation,
ORDER COMPELLING
FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL
Plaintiff, INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE (CCP
§2030.300) AND FOR MONETARY
SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF (CCP
v. §§2023.030, 2030.300(d))
RAYMOND XIANG KAI ZHANG, etal., | DISCOVERY
Date: October 26, 2012
Time: 9:00am
Defendants. Dept.: 302
Complaint filed: June 22, 2010
The motion of Defendant Raymond Zhang for an order requiring Plaintiff Cathay Bank to
further answer interrogatories and to pay reasonable expenses and attorney fees was regularly
heard at the above date and time. The Court has determined that Plaintiff's responses to Special
Interrogatories, Set One are inadequate, and-ebjections-shoutt-be-overrated—Further-the-Court
has determined that Plamtiff Cathay Bank-acted-withoutsubstanti | justification in-epposing
TONS compel further
IT TS ORDERED that Piaintiff serve and file further responses withourobjection® under
oath, definitely and precisely to the extent of all the information available to it, to Special
1
[Seamer] ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF1 Interrogatories Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 8.9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16. 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32,
2 |) 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 48, 50- Set One, by personal service within'seven Plays after
3. |} service of this Order. ua
4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that monetary sanctions in the amount of $3,500 be
6
7 || cofinsel within thirty (30) days of this Order.
8
9 || Dated: h/ Sf (L. (-1-£
fa 74. JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
bethere Heibrtoe
< ote pan fb 5
1B fr Ten Ky i brlre hf n~ jo“ mM
14 Webrne
27
CIM A ASSOCIATES, FC. 9
1440 BROADWAY
SUITE 1900
ote eae ceee {asspimnewe} ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
Preview
IMAC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-26-2012 4:42 pm Case Number: CGC-10-500934 Filing Date: Oct-26-2012 4:41 Filed by: JACQUELINE ALAMEDA Juke Box: 001 Image: 03819721 ORDER CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS. RAYMOND XIANG ZHANG et al 0010603819721 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.cutee associates, RE 1440 BROADWAY SUME 1000 OAKLAND CA SsE12 #910) 832-1686 Chijeh Hu (SBN 241271) CJH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 1440 Broadway, Suite 1000 D Oakland, CA 94612 San Francisco County Superior Court Telephone: (510) 832-1686 Fax: (510) 251-1155 OCT 26 2012 Attorney for Defendants/Cross Complainants, CLERK OF THE COURT RAYMOND ZHANG, et al. BY: hernat ope - Sepury Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CATHAY BANK, a California banking CASE NO: CGC- 10 - 500934 Corporation, ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL Plaintiff, INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE (CCP §2030.300) AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF (CCP v. §§2023.030, 2030.300(d)) RAYMOND XIANG KAI ZHANG, etal., | DISCOVERY Date: October 26, 2012 Time: 9:00am Defendants. Dept.: 302 Complaint filed: June 22, 2010 The motion of Defendant Raymond Zhang for an order requiring Plaintiff Cathay Bank to further answer interrogatories and to pay reasonable expenses and attorney fees was regularly heard at the above date and time. The Court has determined that Plaintiff's responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One are inadequate, and-ebjections-shoutt-be-overrated—Further-the-Court has determined that Plamtiff Cathay Bank-acted-withoutsubstanti | justification in-epposing TONS compel further IT TS ORDERED that Piaintiff serve and file further responses withourobjection® under oath, definitely and precisely to the extent of all the information available to it, to Special 1 [Seamer] ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF1 Interrogatories Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 8.9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16. 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 2 |) 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 48, 50- Set One, by personal service within'seven Plays after 3. |} service of this Order. ua 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that monetary sanctions in the amount of $3,500 be 6 7 || cofinsel within thirty (30) days of this Order. 8 9 || Dated: h/ Sf (L. (-1-£ fa 74. JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT bethere Heibrtoe < ote pan fb 5 1B fr Ten Ky i brlre hf n~ jo“ mM 14 Webrne 27 CIM A ASSOCIATES, FC. 9 1440 BROADWAY SUITE 1900 ote eae ceee {asspimnewe} ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF