On June 22, 2010 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cathay Bank, A California Banking Corporation,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
and
Does 1 Through 200, Inclusive,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OOM
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Nov-15-2012 4:38 pm
Case Number: CGC-10-500934
Filing Date: Nov-14-2012 4:38
Filed by: ERICKA LARNAUT}
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03842995
ORDER
CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS. RAYMOND
XIANG ZHANG et al
001003842995
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BY FAX
Michael Gerard Fletcher (State Bar No. 070849)
mfletcher@frandzel.com
Kenneth N, Russak (State Bar No. 107283)
krussak@frandzel.com
Hanna B. Raanan (State Bar No. 261014)
hraanan@frandzel.com
FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C.
6500 Wilshire Boulevard
Seventeenth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90048-4920
Telephone: (323) 852-1000
Facsimile: (323) 651-2577
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-defendant
CATHAY BANK
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CATHAY BANK, a California banking
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
RAYMOND XIANG KAI ZHANG, aka
RAYMOND KAI ZHANG, aka RAYMOND
ZHANG, aka XIANG KAI ZHANG, aka
XIANG ZHANG, aka ZHANG XIANG, an
individual; CINDY ZHANG, an individual;
DONG YING QUI, an individual; XIANG
KAI, LLC; a California limited liability
company; RAY KAI, LLC , a California
limited liability company; ZHANGS, LLC, a
California limited liability company; and
DOES I through 200, inclusive,
Defendants.
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
1104276.4 | 023000-0790
CASE NO. CGC-10-500934
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Date: © November 13, 2012
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept.: 302
400 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONSFRANDZEL Roains BLoom & Csato, L.C.
6500 WiisHire BOuLevarD, | 7TH FLOOR
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA GOO48-4920
(3231 852-1000
The Court having reviewed Defendants! Motion for Sanctions, Plaintiff's Opposition, and
considered argument on the Motion, notice being proper, and finding good cause therefore, hereby
ORDERS as follows:
1. The Motion is DENIED in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
oft Co fey
ye
Date: } | | vt\ | Judge of the Superior Court
1304276.1 | 623000-0790 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Document Filed Date
November 14, 2012
Case Filing Date
June 22, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.