Order: KAYLA MARCUS VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                OMA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-12-2010 9:42 am

Case Number: CGC-10-498071
Filing Date: May-11-2010 9:41
Juke Box: 001. Image: 02847775
ORDER

KAYLA MARCUS VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al

001002847775

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.aA nA BB w

MAY 0.4 2010

Qe

O

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney San Francisco'Co,

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Mnty Superior Cour
Chief Trial Attorney MAY 11 2019
JAMES F. HANNAWALT, State Bar #139657

Deputy

City Attorney CLERK QF 1
Fox Plaza by: THE COURT
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor

Deputy Clark

San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: (415) 554-3913

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837
E-Mail: james. hannawalt@sfgov.org
Attomeys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
and HENRY GRAY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
KAYLA MARCUS, Case No. CGC-10-498071
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTIN'
FOREXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE
vs. PLEADING 4}3-EXEMBHON-FRONFEAGE
Mor EAE-GHIDERINES- FI3-10
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, HENRY GRAY and DOES | to
50, Place: Dept. 212
Commissioner Arlene T. Borick
Defendants.
Date Action Filed: — April 2, 2010
Trial Date: None Set
Attached Documents: [Application for Order
Granting Extension to File Responsive Pleading and
Exemption from Case Management Guidelines;
Declaration of James F. Hannawalt in Support
Thereof]
Having come on by Application, and having considered the application and supporting
declaration,

1

ORDER Granting 2"4 application to Extend Time to Respond - CASE NO. CGC-10-498071 nAliti2010\101091400626880.docIT IS ORDERED the City and County of San Francisco (City) is granted an extension of time
to file a responsive pleading in the above-captioned case arising from the July 18, 2009 Muni LRV
collision at West Portal Station in San Francisco (West Portal Collision}. The-extensies-ef time to file

. . is @ ded s13-10 | . wa
a responsive pleading
HEKITISC i cored . s Le
Managementtimelines-for-esses-arrsing-fronrtieWwest Porth eotision pursuant 1 CRe Rates st
ad L See

Alms Tr Borick.

ARLENE T. BORICK
COMMISSIONER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

RLENE T. BORICK
ade Pro Tempore

Dated: May Ih, 2010

2
ORDER Granting 2" Application to Extend Time to Respond - CASE NO. CGC-10-498071 ni\fitli20101101091100626880.docoOo Nt TN

PROOF OF SERVICE
J, MARY MARTIN, declare as follows:

lam a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-
entitled action. | am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.

On May 4, 2010, I served the following document(s):

ORDER GRANTING SECOND APPLICATION FOR ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO
FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND EXEMPTION FROM CASE MANAGEMENT
GUIDELINES

on the following persons at the locations specified:

Eric R. Gruber, Esq.

JONES, CLIFFORD, JOHNSON, DEHNER,
WONG, MORRISON, SHEPPARD & BELL,
LLP

100 Van Ness Avenue, 19" Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Yel: (415) 431-5310

Fax: (413) 431-2266

in the manner indicated below:

X BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, | sealed true and correct copies of
the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with
the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's
Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed
for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day.

oO BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations by a professional
messenger service. A declaration from the messenger who made the delivery C is attached or [] will be
filed separately with the court.

O BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: | sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and delivery by overnight courier service. [am
readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for sending overnight deliveries. In
the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be collected by a courier
the same day.

oO BY FACSIMILE: Based on a written agreement of the parties to accept service by fax, I transmitted te and
correct copies of the above document(s) via a facsimile machine at telephone number (415) 554-3837 to the
persons and the fax numbers listed above. The fax transmission was reported as complete and without error. The
transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, and a copy of the transmission
report [1] is attached or ["] will be filed separately with the court.

I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed May 4, 2010, at San Francisco, California.

i

ORDER Granting 2" Application to Extend Time to Respond - CASE NO. CGC-10-49807t n:AMiNi2010\101091\00626880.doc