On June 30, 2010 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Arata, Thomas,
Leake, Joseph,
Owyang, Rich,
Pecot, Johna,
Taylor, Oscar,
Tilton, Stephen,
and
Does 1-100,
Does 1 To 100,
Mcdaniels, Shedrick,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Association,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Association, A,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Foundation,
Savage, Brian,
Wong, David,
Zehner, Michael,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
AA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jan-29-2015 2:09 pm
Case Number: CGC-10-501168
Filing Date: Jan-29-2015 2:09
Filed by: FELICIA GREEN
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04773367
ORDER
JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION,
Aetal
001004773367
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.D
San Francisco County: ‘Superior Court
JAN 2 9 2015
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L, KRANZ wLiryh OF THE COURT
PAUL L. KRANZ, ESQ., SBN 114999 koe anata.
499 14" Street, Suite 300 Penuty Clerk
Oakland, CA 94612
kranzlaw@sbeglobal. net
Telephone: (510) 39-1200
Facsimile: (510) 444.6698
Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, et al,
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
JOHNA PECOT, ct al. Individually and on Behalf of CASE NO. CGC-10-501168
All Others Similarly Situated,
[Propoved] ORDER GRANTING
Plaintts, PLAINTIFFS? MOTION TO
VACATE
v.
SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S
ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit
Corporation, et al.
Time: 9:30 a.m.
)
)
) Date: January 29, 2014
Dept.: 302
)
)
Defendants.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate was regularly scheduled for hearing on January 29, 2015 at
930 a.m. in Department 302 of this Court, before the Honorable Ernest H. Goldsmith, presiding,
Neither party contested the Court’s tentative ruling, the tentative ruling therefore becoming the 4
. cae . . . Plant ths’ motion te vacate
order of this Court, which in substantive part is as follows: fl . .
Jhanfe. (CCF Sec. 443 (6).
The September 26, 2014 Order sustaining the demirrer is vacated. Plaintiff has
established that an opposition to the demurrer was not timely filed because Plaintiff mistakenly
thought Defendant continued the hearing date. A hearing on the demurrer shall be added to the
February 23, 2015 calendar. Plaintiff must timely file the proposed opposition according to the
Code of Civil Procedure, contemplating the new hearing date. Defendant may file a reply brief
-l-
fPropadetifORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO VACATECo Oo IN DH
according to the Code of Civil Procedure, contemplating the new hearing date. Courtesy copies
of all papers filed, including the moving papers, shall be detivered to Dept. 302 with a cover
letter reflecting the new hearing date.
ITIS SO ORDERED.
Dated: JAN 292015 Srnufltinlenn
Honorable Emest YT Idsmith
-2-
[Rrope€¢ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO VACATE
Document Filed Date
January 29, 2015
Case Filing Date
June 30, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
AA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jan-29-2015 2:09 pm Case Number: CGC-10-501168 Filing Date: Jan-29-2015 2:09 Filed by: FELICIA GREEN Juke Box: 001 Image: 04773367 ORDER JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, Aetal 001004773367 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.D San Francisco County: ‘Superior Court JAN 2 9 2015 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L, KRANZ wLiryh OF THE COURT PAUL L. KRANZ, ESQ., SBN 114999 koe anata. 499 14" Street, Suite 300 Penuty Clerk Oakland, CA 94612 kranzlaw@sbeglobal. net Telephone: (510) 39-1200 Facsimile: (510) 444.6698 Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, et al, SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOHNA PECOT, ct al. Individually and on Behalf of CASE NO. CGC-10-501168 All Others Similarly Situated, [Propoved] ORDER GRANTING Plaintts, PLAINTIFFS? MOTION TO VACATE v. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Corporation, et al. Time: 9:30 a.m. ) ) ) Date: January 29, 2014 Dept.: 302 ) ) Defendants. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate was regularly scheduled for hearing on January 29, 2015 at 930 a.m. in Department 302 of this Court, before the Honorable Ernest H. Goldsmith, presiding, Neither party contested the Court’s tentative ruling, the tentative ruling therefore becoming the 4 . cae . . . Plant ths’ motion te vacate order of this Court, which in substantive part is as follows: fl . . Jhanfe. (CCF Sec. 443 (6). The September 26, 2014 Order sustaining the demirrer is vacated. Plaintiff has established that an opposition to the demurrer was not timely filed because Plaintiff mistakenly thought Defendant continued the hearing date. A hearing on the demurrer shall be added to the February 23, 2015 calendar. Plaintiff must timely file the proposed opposition according to the Code of Civil Procedure, contemplating the new hearing date. Defendant may file a reply brief -l- fPropadetifORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO VACATECo Oo IN DH according to the Code of Civil Procedure, contemplating the new hearing date. Courtesy copies of all papers filed, including the moving papers, shall be detivered to Dept. 302 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. ITIS SO ORDERED. Dated: JAN 292015 Srnufltinlenn Honorable Emest YT Idsmith -2- [Rrope€¢ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO VACATE