arrow left
arrow right
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

Wa wu aD LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ soot Sas NZ, ESQ. SBN 1 14999 ELECTRONICALLY * Street, Suite Oakland, CA 94612 FILED kranzlaw@sbeglobal.net Tous: ean, ‘Caltfomia, ‘Telephone: — (510) 839-1200 08/06/: 2015 Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 evga aoa Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, er al., SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CASE NO. CGC-10-501168 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT DAVID WONG'S MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 473(d) TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR IN ORDER AFTER DEMURRER AND SLAPP HEARING JOHNA PECOT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Corporation, et a/. Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 4, 2015, the Court issued an order DENYING Defendant David Wong’s Motion Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 473(d) To Correct Clerical Error In Order After Demurrer And SLAPP Hearing. A true and correct copy of the Honorable Ernest H. Goldsmith’s order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Dated: August 5, 2015 Respectfully submitted, Plu L. Kun? By: Paul L. Kranz -l- NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR (C.C.P. §473(4))EXHIBIT ALAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ PAULL. KRANZ, ESQ., SBN 114999 EK At Sie 2 A alte Oakland CASAC? sos Crit os kranzlaw@sbeglobal.net AUG 04 20 5 Telephone: (510) 839-1200 URT Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 . CLERK OF THE CO By, a eat ‘eputy Clerk Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, et al. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOHNA PECOT, et al. Individually and on Behalf of) | CASE NQ. CGC-10-501168 All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) posed] ORDER RE. Plaintiffs, ) EFENDANT DAVID WONG'S ) MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE v. ) -OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ) SECTION 473(d) TO CORRECT SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ) CLERICAL ERROR IN ORDER ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit ) AFTER DEMURRER AND SLAPP Corporation, et al. ) HEARING : ) Defendants. ) Date: August 4, 2015 7 \ Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 302 Defendant Dave Wong's Motion Pursuant To Code Of Civil Procedure Section . 473(d) To Correct Clerical Error In Order After Demurrer And Slapp Hearing was scheduled for hearing on August 4, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 302. The Court, having considered the parties moving and opposing papers, issued a tentative ruling. The tentative ruling was not contested. The Court, therefore, adopts.its tentative ruling, which stated as : follows: The motion is denied. The January 12, 2015 Order accurately reflects the Court's ° ruling on the Anti-SLAPP motion. Although Plaintiff stipulated to removing allegations tt —fProposed} ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION 110 CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR (C.CP. §473(¢))om Ya Hw FF WN oS pertaining to the dismissed Defendants on the record at the hearing, Defendants did not prevail on their Anti-SLAPP motion. As. stated in the Order, an Anti-SLAPP motion can only be used to challenge causes of action and not specific factual allegations. A regular motion to strike would have been the proper procedural mechanism for achieving the results sought from the Anti-SLAPP motion. Further, Defendants engaged in no meaningful analysis as to whether the first prong of the statute was met. Thus, the Order js accurate, including the statement that the Anti-SLAPP motion was frivolous. oe Enreablon! Honorable nia Goldsnuth ERNEST H, Lose Approved as to form: Lawrence D. Murray, Esq. Attorney for Defendants David Wong, Michael Zehner, Brian Savage and Shedrick McDaniels . -2- —Breposed} ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR (C.C.P. $473(d))PROOF OF SERVICE SUPERIOR COURT ) ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) CASE NO. CCC-10-501168 ) COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) I, the undersigned, certify and attest as follows: lam over the age of cightecn years and am not a party to the cause within. My business address is 499 14" Street, Suite 300, Oakland, California 94612. On August 6, 2015, | caused the following documents: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT DAVID WONG'S MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 473(d) TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR IN ORDER AFTER DEMURRER AND SLAPP HEARING GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES to be served on defendants’ counsel electronically by File&Serve Express and by hand delivery as follows: Lara C. Smith, Esq. Lawrence D. Murray, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF LARA C. SMITH Murray & Associates 1086 Arlington Blvd. 1781 Union Street El Cerrito, California 94530 San Francisco, CA 94123-4426 e-mail:lara@shremlaw.com e-mail:daydrmn@aol.com I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and this declaration was executed in Oakland, California on August 6, 2015. lauuwtoly P10 Gloria Reynolds 7