On May 03, 2010 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wong, Carmen,
and
City And County Of San Francisco,
Does 1 Thru 100,
Gray, Henry,
for PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OOO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-26-2010 10:00 am
Case Number: CGC-10-499379
Filing Date: May-25-2010 9:26
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02861192
ORDER
CARMEN WONG VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
001002861192
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attomey
JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961
Chief Trial Attorney
JAMES F. HANNAWALLT, State Bar #139657
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: (415) 554-3913
Facsimile: (415) 554-3837
E-Mail: james.hannawalt@sfgov.org
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CARMEN WONG,
Plaintiff,
VS.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, HENRY GRAY, and DOES
ONE through ONE-HUNDRED,
Defendants.
declaration,
San Francisco County ‘Superior Court
MAY 29 2010
CLERK QF THE COURT
BY: ‘Deputy Clerk
—
O02 be Ay Use
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
Case No. CGC-10-499379
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR
EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE
PLEADING *ND-EXEMPHON-FROMFEASE
MANAGEMENE-GUPDETINES fo 9-/3-/ °
Place: Dept. 212
Commissioner Ariene T. Borick
Date Action Filed: May 3, 2010
Trial Date: None Set
Attached Documents: [Application for Order
Granting Extension to File Responsive Pleading and
Exemption from Case Management Guidelines;
Declaration of James F. Hannawalt in Support
Thereof}
Having come on by Application, and having considered the application and supporting
1
ORDER Granting Application to Extend Time to Respond Case No. CGC-10-499379 n Mitsti2010\101 287500630039.docIT IS ORDERED the City and County of San Francisco (City) is granted an extension of time
to file a responsive pleading in the above-captioned case arising from the July 18, 2009 Muni LRV
collision at West Portal Station in San Francisco (West Portal Collision). Fre-extenstorroftimtetette
-FURTHER;-FF-4S-ORDERED- thar tit above-captioned Cast Is exempt-frem-the-nermal-Casewn—
mesete Defendants shal have until 9-13-10 +0 cespond to the. complaiat,
Onlume. T Concho
ARLENE T. BORICK
COMMISSIONER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
ARLENE T. BORICK
Judge Pro Tempore
Dated: May 2%, 2010
2
ORDER Granting Application to Extend Time to Respond Case No. CGC-10-499379 nAFiti2010\101287\00630039.docPROOF OF SERVICE
I, MARY MARTIN, declare as follows:
Tam acitizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-
entitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
On May 19, 2010, I served the following document(s):
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE
PLEADING AND EXEMPTION FROM CASE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
on the following persons at the locations specified:
Matthew D. Davis, Esq.
Spencer J. Pahlke, Esq.
WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY &
SCHOENBERGER
650 California Street, 26" Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-2615
Tel: (415) 981-7210
Fax: (415) 391-6965
in the manner indicated below:
0 BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of
the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with
the United States Postal Service. | am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's
Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed
for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day.
O BY PERSONAL SERVICE: | sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations by a professional
messenger service. A declaration from the messenger who made the delivery 1 is attached or [] will be
filed separately with the court.
CJ BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I scaled true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and delivery by overnight courier service. ] am
readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for sending overnight deliveries. In
the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be collected by a courier
the same day.
oO BY FACSIMILE: Based on a written agreement of the parties to accept service by fax, I transmitted true and
correct copies of the above document(s) via a facsimile machine at telephone number (415) 554-3837 to the
persons and the fax numbers listed above. The fax transmission was reported as complete and without error. The
transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, and a copy of the transmission
report [] is attached or [J will be filed separately with the court.
1 declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed May 19, 2010, at San Francisco, California.
“Msgr
an
ORDER Granting Application to Extend Time to Respond Case No. CGC-10-499379 n-Miti2010\101287\00630039.doc
Document Filed Date
May 25, 2010
Case Filing Date
May 03, 2010
Category
PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OOO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-26-2010 10:00 am Case Number: CGC-10-499379 Filing Date: May-25-2010 9:26 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02861192 ORDER CARMEN WONG VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al 001002861192 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attomey JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Attorney JAMES F. HANNAWALLT, State Bar #139657 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3913 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: james.hannawalt@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CARMEN WONG, Plaintiff, VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, HENRY GRAY, and DOES ONE through ONE-HUNDRED, Defendants. declaration, San Francisco County ‘Superior Court MAY 29 2010 CLERK QF THE COURT BY: ‘Deputy Clerk — O02 be Ay Use SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION Case No. CGC-10-499379 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING *ND-EXEMPHON-FROMFEASE MANAGEMENE-GUPDETINES fo 9-/3-/ ° Place: Dept. 212 Commissioner Ariene T. Borick Date Action Filed: May 3, 2010 Trial Date: None Set Attached Documents: [Application for Order Granting Extension to File Responsive Pleading and Exemption from Case Management Guidelines; Declaration of James F. Hannawalt in Support Thereof} Having come on by Application, and having considered the application and supporting 1 ORDER Granting Application to Extend Time to Respond Case No. CGC-10-499379 n Mitsti2010\101 287500630039.docIT IS ORDERED the City and County of San Francisco (City) is granted an extension of time to file a responsive pleading in the above-captioned case arising from the July 18, 2009 Muni LRV collision at West Portal Station in San Francisco (West Portal Collision). Fre-extenstorroftimtetette -FURTHER;-FF-4S-ORDERED- thar tit above-captioned Cast Is exempt-frem-the-nermal-Casewn— mesete Defendants shal have until 9-13-10 +0 cespond to the. complaiat, Onlume. T Concho ARLENE T. BORICK COMMISSIONER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ARLENE T. BORICK Judge Pro Tempore Dated: May 2%, 2010 2 ORDER Granting Application to Extend Time to Respond Case No. CGC-10-499379 nAFiti2010\101287\00630039.docPROOF OF SERVICE I, MARY MARTIN, declare as follows: Tam acitizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above- entitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102. On May 19, 2010, I served the following document(s): ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND EXEMPTION FROM CASE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES on the following persons at the locations specified: Matthew D. Davis, Esq. Spencer J. Pahlke, Esq. WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER 650 California Street, 26" Floor San Francisco, CA 94108-2615 Tel: (415) 981-7210 Fax: (415) 391-6965 in the manner indicated below: 0 BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service. | am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day. O BY PERSONAL SERVICE: | sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations by a professional messenger service. A declaration from the messenger who made the delivery 1 is attached or [] will be filed separately with the court. CJ BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I scaled true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and delivery by overnight courier service. ] am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for sending overnight deliveries. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be collected by a courier the same day. oO BY FACSIMILE: Based on a written agreement of the parties to accept service by fax, I transmitted true and correct copies of the above document(s) via a facsimile machine at telephone number (415) 554-3837 to the persons and the fax numbers listed above. The fax transmission was reported as complete and without error. The transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, and a copy of the transmission report [] is attached or [J will be filed separately with the court. 1 declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed May 19, 2010, at San Francisco, California. “Msgr an ORDER Granting Application to Extend Time to Respond Case No. CGC-10-499379 n-Miti2010\101287\00630039.doc