arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD PO BOX 6169 NOWATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (48) B5B-1555 DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., §.B. #154436 NANCY T. WILLIAMS, ESQ., S.B. #201095 BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP Attorneys at Law 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novato, California 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 ~ ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco NOV 17 2010 Tentative Ruling Contest Email: contestashestosTR@braytonlaw.com Clerk of the Court Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: VANESSA WU Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LAURANCE HAGEN, Plaintiff, VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA; Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit | attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500. Nl el te at ASBESTOS No. CGC-10-275582 DECLARATION OF NANCY T. WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANTS’ TRUE NAMES FOR DOES 2-4 & 1002-1004 I, Nancy T. Williams, declare as follows: [C.CP. § 473] Date: November 18, 2010 Time: 11:00 am. Dept.: 220, Hon. Harold E. Kahn ‘Trial Date: N/A Filing Date: June 2, 2010 1. Lam an attorncy at law duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of California; and am an associate in the law firm of Brayton“Purcell LLP, attorneys of record for plaintiff herein. 2. Plaintiff proposes to file an Amendment to the Complaint to substitute defendants’ true name for “Doe,” a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. At the time the original complaint was filed herein, plaintiff was unaware of certain entities’ true names that may share responsibility for plaintiff LAURANCE HAGEN’s asbestos- KNsjured\s08)23ipld\dce-xpl-outa-emp-topt-d & 1007-1004.4yp0 1 NIW DECLARATION OF NANCY T. WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANTS’ TRUE NAMES FOR DOES 2.4 & 1002-1004related disease. Plaintiff conducted further investigation and has now ascertained the entities’ true and correct names. Plaintiff therefore now wishes to file this Amendment to reflect the party’s true and correct name. Therefore, the three new defendants who manufactured, distributed, supplied and/or installed asbestos-containing products to plaintiff, LAURANCE HAGEN’s employers/jobsites, have been added to the Amendment to summary complaint (MCKEON CONSTRUCTION, JAMES A. NELSON CO., INC., and KENT M. LIM & COMPANY, INC). 4, The statute of limitations for filing claims against any defendant or adding new parties 1o the action has not yet run, 5. Filing of an Amendment to the Complaint is necessary and proper to allow plaintiff to allege all claims for his asbestos-related injuries and damages, to include all defendants identified as proper parties herein, and properly present all theories of liability. I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on LL L 4 L10 , at Novato, Cali K Mojuredi198 )23\pldidec-xpr-mia-emp-ilog-2-4 & 1002-1004. wpd 2 NTW DECLARATION OF NANCY.-T. WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDMENT TO THE COM#LAINT TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANTS’ TRUE NAMES FOR DOES 2-4 & 1002-1004EXHIBIT ABRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD PO BOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA $4948.6169 (415) 298-1535 DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., 8.B. #154436 BRAYTON‘“PURCELL LEP Attorneys at Law 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novato, California 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LAURANCE HAGEN, ASBESTOS . No, CGC-10-275582 AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT TO Plaintiff, NAMES FOR DOES 2-4 &1002-1004 ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA; Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1- 3300. d ) vs. . 3 SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANTS’ TRUE ) } [C.C.P, Section 474] Plaintiff amends the complaint in this action as follows: Plaintiff has learned the true names of the defendant designated in the complaint as fictitious DOES as set forth below: NAME ’ FICTITIOUS NAME MCKEON CONSTRUCTION DOE 2 & 1002 [Dates/Site: Good Samaritan Hospital, an Jose, CA; 1963-1967] JAMES A. NELSON CO., INC. DOE 3 & 1003 [ates/Sites: Chabot College, Hayward, CA; 964 - 1966 Approx. two months Alternate Entities: DINWIDDIE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FDCC CALIFORNIA, INC. Wt ul H.Xojured10823\ptdDoe 2:9 & 1002-1008 fr 1 (AMENDMENT TO GOMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANTS’ TRUE NAMES FOR DOES 2-4 & 1002-1004 exeinir|A |See NAW ew BON 1s KENT M. LIM & COMPANY, INC. DOE 4 & 1004 [Dates/Sites: 101 Califormia San Francisco, CA; 9/30/95-10/1/96; 10/19/96; 11/1/96; 11/4/96-11/5/96; 120 Montgomery, San Francisco, CA; 10/2/96; 10/3/96; 120 Kearny San Francisco, CA; 5/6/98] Piaintiff hereby substitutes such true names for the fictitious names as set forth above wherever said names appear in the complaint. Dated: | tlrel 9 BRAYTON*PURCELL LLP By: Ww David R. Donadio Attomeys for Plaintiff EXnjuedN 08123 \Doe 2-3 £1992. 1003.Fi AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANTS’ TRUE NAMES FOR DOES 2-4 & 1002-1004