arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Civ-110 "ATTORNEY OF PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY jae, Sale Bar nabe and eras: Alan R. Brayton, Esq (Bar #73685) FoR COURTUSE OMLY Brayton > Purcell 222 Rush Landing Road, N CA 94948 cuataconese ean FEE rc ms ELECTRONICALLY ArTonneyron wane: Plaintiffs, ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS FILED ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY oF San Francisco Superior Court of Caltfornia, street aporess: 400 McAllister Street County of San Francisco MAILING ADDRESS: 10/27/2015 cryanoziecooe: San Francisco 94102 Clerk of the Court [BRANCH NAME: BY-MADONNA CARANTO Deputy Clerk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL cASENUMBER: §—- CGC-10-275731 Acconformed copy will not be retumed by the clerk unless a method of retum Is provided with the document. This form may not be used for dismissal of a derivative action oF a class action or of any party or cause of action Ina class action. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770.) 1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) [XJ With prejudice (2) [__] Without prejudice b. (1) [_] Complaint (2) [[] Petition (3) [_] Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (4) [J Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (5)[] Entire action of all parties and all causes of action (6) GX] Other (specity):* As to defendant EMIL J. WEBER ELECTRIC CO. only. Each party to bear its own costs. 2. (Complete in all cases except family law cases.) did not waive court fees and costs for a party in this case. (This information may be obtained from the clerk. If court fees and costs were waived, the declaration on the is form must be completed). Date; SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 for Alan R. Brayton (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF TTORNEY [___] PARTY WTHOUT ATTORNEY) “i lomineal requested is of epeciied partes ony of spectied causes of acon Atomey or party without atomey for. calor of speatied cross complains only, 9 slate and ientty the partes, — ['] PiaintifPetitioner - L__] DefendantRespondent Co Cross-Complainant 3. TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given. Date: 10/ ¥6/1S Rock bs ea Hearn > TNs | CPE OR PriTHAME OF [XK] ATTORNEY [-—] PaRTY wirHOuT ATTORNEY) ‘if a cross-complaint — or Response ( mily Law) seeking affirmative Attomey or party with; for: tne earn erence Brocedre section 31) [1] PiaintitiPetiioner = 2) DefendantRespondent org) ([) Cross-Complainant (To be completed by clerk) 4. [[] Dismissal entered as requested on (date): 5 [__] Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name): 6. [__] Dismissa! not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): DISMISSAL ENTERED 7. a. [1] Attomey or party without attomey notified on (date): b. [[] Attomey or party without attomey not notified. Filing party failed to provide ‘acopy to be conformed [__] means to return conformed copy Date: Clerk, by , Deputy Page tot? Poca Conch at Catania REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL ov. Code, § asa} Gal Re of Gout toe 8158 GIVA10 Rev dan. 1, 2013}, ‘no courtsc8 ov LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council FormsCN-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. CGC-10-275731 COURT'S RECOVERY OF WAIVED COURT FEES AND COSTS If a party whose court fees and costs were initially waived has recovered or will recover $10,000 or more in value by way of settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other means, the court has a statutory lien on that recovery. The court may refuse to dismiss the case until the lien is satisfied. (Gov. Code, § 68637.) Declaration Concerning Waived Court Fees 41. The court waived court fees and costs in this action for (name): 2. The person named in item 1 is (check one below): a. [2] not recovering anything of value by this action. b. [_] recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action. ¢. [_] recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (If item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.) 3.[] Allcourt fees and court costs that were waived in this action have been paid to the court (check one): [_] Yes [_] No | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. > (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF [——] ATTORNEY [_—] PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) (SIGNATURE) “wvet0{Rev.Janary 12018) REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Page 20t2 LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council FormsN PROOF OF SERVICE I, the undersign, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. My business address is Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 525 Market Street, 17" Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Iam over eighteen years old and not a party to this action. On the date set forth below, I served the following document(s) described as: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL XX]: By Electronic Service. In the ordinary course of business, the foregoing documents were served to all parties and their counsel counsel registered with File & ServeXpress, as designated on the Transaction Receipt available on the File & ServeXpress website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed October 27, 2015, at San Francisco, California. ‘ayessa Santellan PROOF OF SERVICE 1465370v.1