arrow left
arrow right
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

Oo ‘DOTA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Nov-13-2015 11:49 am. Case Number: CGC-11-514980 Filing Date: Nov-13-2015 11:46 Filed by: GINA GONZALES Juke Box: 001 Image: 05155941 TEXT JUDGMENT JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS 0010051 55941 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Kyle Law Corporation Co Om YN D-H FF WN ee Be Se oe Se Se oe BBR BS&eBWTABDEBHRHS 24 STEPHAN E. KYLE (SBN 158075) REN COlbRAHON Fo 230 California Street, Suite 600 San Francis Superior Court San Francisco,CA 94111, NOV 13 2015 Telephone: (415) 839-8100 Facsimile: (415) 839-8189 . . RT Email: skyle@kylelawcorp.com CLERK OF THE COU By ‘Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Plaintiffs JASON EVERETT THOMPSON and WIRED REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JASON EVERETT THOMPSON and WIRED REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC., CASEND. GGC-11-514980 Plaintiffs, : [PRO | JUDGMENT OF v. CONTEMPT DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS, dba DRAKE REALTY, Defendant. AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. Following a hearing on the Court’s.Order, dated September 21, 2015, directing Defendant DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS (the “Contemnor”) to show cause why the judgment of contempt should| not be entered against him for willfully disobeying the order and permanent injunction issued by this Court on August 23, 2013 (the “Permanent Injunction”), and the entry of the Court’s Order, dated November , 2015 (the “Contempt Order”), finding, inter alia, Contemnor guilty of contempt as charged beyond a reasonable doubt, the Court hereby orders entry of judgment as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: After due consideration, and as set forth in the Contempt Order, the Court finds beyond a -1- JUDGMENT OF CONTEMPT CGC-11-514980xe 1 reasonable doubt: 2 1. That Contemnor is guilty of contempt of court, beyond a reasonable doubt, in violation 3 || of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1209(a)(5) for disobedience ofa lawful judgment, order 4 |) or process of the court; 5 2. That Contemnor had knowledge of the Permanent Injunction, was able to comply at 6 || the time of the Permanent Injunction and continued to have such ability, and willfully failed to comply 7 || with the Permanent Injunction; 8 3. That Contemnor is sentenced to: 9 a. Pay a fine to the Court in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000). The 10 Con vt of the fine is stayed yeden November 13, 2015 at 11:00 a.m, in Dept. 503. W Matt Vay Mauerlie 13, 2015 | fullte ey - 12 b. Pay to Plaintiffs the-amount of $_————_in a fees and cos 13 incurred in initiating and prosecuting the contempt charge against Se Le ag wa 14 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. i te 15 Opin 16 || patep: _ tt (3 [4 d Med 17 . TERI L. JACKSON 18 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 19 SRR 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Kole 27 Corporation 28 -2- JUDGMENT OF CONTEMPT CGC-11-514980