arrow left
arrow right
  • CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LORRAINE LIM EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LORRAINE LIM EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LORRAINE LIM EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LORRAINE LIM EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LORRAINE LIM EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LORRAINE LIM EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
						
                                

Preview

MEU SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Feb-13-2013 2:20 pm Case Number: CGC-11-515610 Filing Date: Feb-13-2013 2:19 Filed by: LESLEY FISCELLA Juke Box: 001 Image: 03942180 ORDER CITIBANK, N.A. VS. LORRAINE LIM 001003942180 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned."ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name and Address) TELEPHONE NO.: FOR COURT USE ONLY ATTORNEY FOR (Name): ‘NAME OF COURT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OR BRANCH COURT, IF ANY: FEB 13 2013 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PLAINTIFF: CITIBANK, N.A. DEFENDANT: LORRAINE LIM, AN INDIVIDUAL San Francisco County Superior CLERK OF THE COURT ow TN agg Court IM OF EXEM LEVYING OFFICER FILE NO. ‘COURT CASE NO. ORDER OEE ENON stn a PTION 2012047117 CGC-11-51561 1. The application of (name): Citibank, N.A. 2. For an order determining the Claim of Exemption of (name): Lorraine Lim 3. Was heard on (date) February 13, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. in Dept. 302 (Check boxes to indicate personal presence) [71 uagment Creditor (name): Judgment Debtor (name): [1 attomey (name): Oo Arcomey (name) EXQ AD | a ZaloL 4, The court considered the evidence in support of and in opposition to the Claim of Exemption. 5. IJTIS ORDERED a ‘a The judgment debior's Claim of Exemption is denied, 1 7 > ont b. [| The judgment debtor's Claim of Exemption is granted. c. [] The levying officer is directed to release any carnings held to the judgment debtor. a. [_] ‘he levying officer is directed to release any earnings si to the en creditor for payment on the judgment. Tse sou av dex SSS aornishes NS ones (rect YO.00 f. The clerk shail transmit a certified copy of this order to een levying officer. officer shall notify the employer of any change ii the Eamings Withholding Order and release any retained sums as provided in this order. ow: 2/(2]20%% » Lt 2 Hon. Perex J. BUSCH JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Z (SEAL) CLERK’S CERTIFICATION I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. Date: Clerk, by »Deputy i ORDER DETERMINING CLAIM OF EXEMPTION Form Adopted by the CCP 706.405 Judicial Council of California 982.5(9), [Rev. July 1, 1983) (Wage Garnishment)Superior Court of California County of San Francisco CGC-11-515610 Citibank vs. Lim CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL I, the undersigned, certify: That I am a Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court, State of California, in the County of San i Francisco, and not a party to the within cause; That on this date, I served a true copy of the document affixed hereto, ' by depositing a copy thereof, enclosed in separate envelopes, postage prepaid, in the United States Mail, addressed i to the respective counsels, or parties appearing in Propria Persona, at their address as shown on the document(s) that i have been filed in this matter. Dated: WMA ‘At San Francisco, Cali Plaintiff(s) Counsel: Defendant(s) HARVEY M. MOORE, ESQ. LORRAINE LIM THE MOORE LAW GROUP, APC c/o DAVID STEPHEN ZALOB, ESQ. P.O. BOX 25145 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, STE. 750! SANTA ANA, CA 92799-5145 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE SHERIFF’S CIVIL BUREAU 3341 POWER INN RD., RM. 313 SACRAMENTO, CA 95826-3889 Form Adopted by the ORDER DETERMINING CLAIM OF EXEMPTION Judicial Council of California (Wage Garnishment) GOP 70 982.5(9), [Rev. July 1, 1983)