On December 31, 2014 a
ORD:OTHER ORDER
was filed
involving a dispute between
Antongiorgi , Isabelle Maria,
Schram Mcdonnell Llc,
Schram , Richard,
George Mundanthanam Md Pa,
Mundanthanam , George,
Josh Crum Md Pa,
Crum , Josh,
Mark Mcdonnell Dpm Pa,
Mcdonnell , Mark,
South Oaks Family Medicine Pa,
Cox , Geoffrey,
Steigler , Ashley,
and
Ventas Inc,
Lillibridge Healthcare Real Estate Trust Lp,
Lhret Ascension Austin Partner Gp Llc,
Lhret Ascension Austin Partner Ii Gp Llc,
Lhret Ascension Austin Lp,
Lhret Ascension Austin Ii Lp,
Thl 191 Jv Llc,
Lhret 191 Llc,
Lillibridge Healthcare Services Inc,
Metevier , Dan,
for FRAUD (GEN LIT )
in the District Court of Travis County.
Preview
Dc BK15100 PG13
Filed in The District c
of Travis County, Texas
APR -8 2015
. At M.
CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-14-005444 Velva L. Price, District Clerk
SCHRAM MCDONNELL, LLC, et al § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
§
Plaintiffs, §
§
v. § TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS
§
VENTAS, INC., ef af §
§
Defendants § 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PROTECTION
On this day, the Court considered Plaintiffs' Motion for Protection, the Supplement to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protection, and Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Protection.
After considering the pleadings, the evidence in this case and the arguments of counsel, the
Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1, Each of the 10 Defendants served a set of interrogatories to each of the 12
Plaintiffs (total of 120 sets of interrogatories). Plaintiffs are required to respond
to each set of Interrogatories served by the Defendants, but in each Answer
Plaintiffs may respond by clearly incorporating and adopting text by reference in
the manner described below, if subject to any objections or privileges such an
answer would be accurate and fully-responsive to the interrogatory.
2. With respect to incorporated and adopted responses, Plaintiffs need not provide a
written response after each individual interrogatory. For example, Plaintiff A may
respond to Defendant Y's First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff A by stating as
follows:
Plaintiff hereby adopts and fully incorporates by reference his
responses, objections, . and assertions of privilege to
Interrogatories 1-25 of Defendant X's First Set of Interrogatories to
Plaintiff A.
3. Plaintiffs must verify all responses, including responses that have been adopted or
incorporated by reference. Each Plaintiff will provide a separate verification for
each Defendant’s set of interrogatories.
Nothing in this order prohibits Plaintiffs from asserting objections or privileges, or
seeking further protection from the Court. Nothing in this order prohibits Defendants from
seeking relief from this Court with respect to the substance of any interrogatory response.
Case # D-1-GN-14-005444
OU A A | aes
103973130
oODc BK15100 PG14
N-(-Ga-t4-005ud9
cine Be
SIGNED this the day of April, 2015.
JUDG! SULAK
AGREED:
BaracklFerrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP
Roger Stetson
roger.stetson@bfkn.com
Matthew Singer .
matthew.singer@bfkn.com
200 West Madison Street
Suite 3900
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Strasburger & Price, LLP
Lloyd E. Ferguson
Buddy. Ferguson@strasburger.ci
720 Brazos Street
Suite 700
Austin, Texas 78701-2974
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
SD
Taylor Dunham ahd
Donald R. Taylor
State Bar No. 19688800
dtaylor@taylordunham.com
Isabelle M. Antongiorgi
State Bar No. 24059386
im lordunh:
301 Congress Avenue
Suite 1050
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: (512) 473-2257
Facsimile: (512) 478-4409
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Protection Page 2
Document Filed Date
April 08, 2015
Case Filing Date
December 31, 2014
Category
FRAUD (GEN LIT )
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.