Preview
NUNCA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Aug-10-2012 2:49 pm
Case Number: CGC-12-520772
Filing Date: Aug-10-2012 2:49
Filed by: MICHAEL RAYRAY
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03721051
GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)
TJADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
001C03721051
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.HAIALNOU
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Aug-10-2012 2:49 pm
Case Number: CGC-12-520772
Filing Date: Aug-10-2012 2:49
Filed by: MICHAEL RAYRAY
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03721051
GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)
TJADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
001003721051
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961
Chief Trial Deputy
DAVID W. AMMONS, State Bar #187168
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: (415) 554-3954
Facsimile: (415) 554-3837
E-Mail: david.ammons@sfgov.org
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
T'JADE JACKSON, Case No. CGC-12-520772
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO'S OBJECTION TO COURT
vs. COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO
TEMPORE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 3.6(A) AND 6.0(C)
FRANCISCO, DAVID EBARLE, ROBERT
RUBESHAW,
Date Action Filed: May 14, 2012
Defendant. Trial Date: None Set
TO: PLAINTIFF AND HER ATTORNEY OF RECORD:
Pursuant to San Francisco Superior Court Local Rule 3.6(A) and 6.0(C), Defendant City and
County of San Francisco (the “City”), a municipal corporation, ("Defendant"), named as such and also
erroneously designated as San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency and San Francisco
///
iil
//1
1
Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 nMit\li2012\1 3001 3\00790678.doc.
CCSF's Obj. to Ct. CommissionerHULA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Aug-10-2012 2:49 pm
Case Number: CGC-12-520772
Filing Date: Aug-10-2012 2:49
Filed by: MICHAEL RAYRAY
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03721051
GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)
T'JADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
001003721051
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 crue
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961
Chief Trial Deputy
DAVID W. AMMONS, State Bar #187168
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: (415) 554-3954
Facsimile: (415) 554-3837
E-Mail: david.ammons@sfgov.org
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
T'JADE JACKSON, Case No. CGC-12-520772
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO'S OBJECTION TO COURT
vs. COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO
TEMPORE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 3.6(A) AND 6.0(C)
FRANCISCO, DAVID EBARLE, ROBERT
RUBESHAW,
Date Action Filed: May 14, 2012
Defendant. Trial Date: None Set
TO: PLAINTIFF AND HER ATTORNEY OF RECORD:
Pursuant to San Francisco Superior Court Local Rule 3.6(A) and 6.0(C), Defendant City and
County of San Francisco (the “City”), a municipal corporation, ("Defendant"), named as such and also
erroneously designated as San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency and San Francisco
///
///
///
1
Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 nMit\i2012\130013\00790678.doc
CCSF's Obj. to Ct. CommissionerMunicipal Railway objects to having a Court Commissioner act as a Judge Pro Tempore in the above-
captioned action.
Dated: August 10, 2012
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER
Chief Trial Deputy
DAVID W. AMMONS
Deputy City Attorney
By: Ou. | C—,
DAVID W. AMMONS
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
2
Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 n\lit\ti2012\1 3001 3\00790678.doc
CCSF's Obj. to Ct. CommissionerPROOF OF SERVICE
I, DOROTHY SILVER, declare as follows:
lam a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-
entitled action. Iam employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
On August 10, 2012, I served the following document(s):
DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S OBJECTION TO COURT
COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE
3.6(A) AND 6.0(C)
on the following persons at the locations specified:
Sanford M. Cipinko, Esq.
Law Offices of Sanford M. Cipinko
55 Francisco Street, Suite 403
San Francisco, CA 94133
Tel: (415) 693-9905
Facsimile: (415) 693-9904
in the manner indicated below:
X BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of
the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with
the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's
Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed
for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day.
oO BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations by a professional
messenger service. A declaration from the messenger who made the delivery [_] is attached or [] will be
filed separately with the court.
oO BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and delivery by overnight courier service. Iam
readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for sending overnight deliveries. In
the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be collected by a courier
the same day.
I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed August 10, 2012, at San Francisco, California. ‘
\ 4 Vins
DOROTHY-SILVER
3
Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 nMit\i2012\1 3001 3\00790678.doc
CCSF's Obj. to Ct. Commissioner
Preview
NUNCA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Aug-10-2012 2:49 pm Case Number: CGC-12-520772 Filing Date: Aug-10-2012 2:49 Filed by: MICHAEL RAYRAY Juke Box: 001 Image: 03721051 GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE) TJADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al 001C03721051 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.HAIALNOU SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Aug-10-2012 2:49 pm Case Number: CGC-12-520772 Filing Date: Aug-10-2012 2:49 Filed by: MICHAEL RAYRAY Juke Box: 001 Image: 03721051 GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE) TJADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al 001003721051 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy DAVID W. AMMONS, State Bar #187168 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3954 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: david.ammons@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION T'JADE JACKSON, Case No. CGC-12-520772 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S OBJECTION TO COURT vs. COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 3.6(A) AND 6.0(C) FRANCISCO, DAVID EBARLE, ROBERT RUBESHAW, Date Action Filed: May 14, 2012 Defendant. Trial Date: None Set TO: PLAINTIFF AND HER ATTORNEY OF RECORD: Pursuant to San Francisco Superior Court Local Rule 3.6(A) and 6.0(C), Defendant City and County of San Francisco (the “City”), a municipal corporation, ("Defendant"), named as such and also erroneously designated as San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency and San Francisco /// iil //1 1 Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 nMit\li2012\1 3001 3\00790678.doc. CCSF's Obj. to Ct. CommissionerHULA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Aug-10-2012 2:49 pm Case Number: CGC-12-520772 Filing Date: Aug-10-2012 2:49 Filed by: MICHAEL RAYRAY Juke Box: 001 Image: 03721051 GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE) T'JADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al 001003721051 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 crue City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy DAVID W. AMMONS, State Bar #187168 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3954 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: david.ammons@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION T'JADE JACKSON, Case No. CGC-12-520772 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S OBJECTION TO COURT vs. COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 3.6(A) AND 6.0(C) FRANCISCO, DAVID EBARLE, ROBERT RUBESHAW, Date Action Filed: May 14, 2012 Defendant. Trial Date: None Set TO: PLAINTIFF AND HER ATTORNEY OF RECORD: Pursuant to San Francisco Superior Court Local Rule 3.6(A) and 6.0(C), Defendant City and County of San Francisco (the “City”), a municipal corporation, ("Defendant"), named as such and also erroneously designated as San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency and San Francisco /// /// /// 1 Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 nMit\i2012\130013\00790678.doc CCSF's Obj. to Ct. CommissionerMunicipal Railway objects to having a Court Commissioner act as a Judge Pro Tempore in the above- captioned action. Dated: August 10, 2012 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy DAVID W. AMMONS Deputy City Attorney By: Ou. | C—, DAVID W. AMMONS Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 2 Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 n\lit\ti2012\1 3001 3\00790678.doc CCSF's Obj. to Ct. CommissionerPROOF OF SERVICE I, DOROTHY SILVER, declare as follows: lam a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above- entitled action. Iam employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102. On August 10, 2012, I served the following document(s): DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S OBJECTION TO COURT COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 3.6(A) AND 6.0(C) on the following persons at the locations specified: Sanford M. Cipinko, Esq. Law Offices of Sanford M. Cipinko 55 Francisco Street, Suite 403 San Francisco, CA 94133 Tel: (415) 693-9905 Facsimile: (415) 693-9904 in the manner indicated below: X BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day. oO BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations by a professional messenger service. A declaration from the messenger who made the delivery [_] is attached or [] will be filed separately with the court. oO BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and delivery by overnight courier service. Iam readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for sending overnight deliveries. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be collected by a courier the same day. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed August 10, 2012, at San Francisco, California. ‘ \ 4 Vins DOROTHY-SILVER 3 Jackson, et al. v. CCSF, et al.; Sup. Ct. No. CGC-12-520772 nMit\i2012\1 3001 3\00790678.doc CCSF's Obj. to Ct. Commissioner