On February 03, 2016 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
Emily Leproust,
Siyuan Chen,
Solange Glaize,
for civil
in the District Court of Santa Clara County.
Preview
16CV291137
Santa Clara — Civil
Electronically Filed
by Superior Court of CA,
ReMiAMEAERY os
se
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN LLP
WILSON
& ROS. A 50204
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN (S.B. # 170151) CHARLE; i )
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com tgraves@vwGaseo#l 6CV291137
MELISSA J. BAILY (S.B. #237649) One MarkdEieeto, BIBSBOHH Suite 3300
melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
50 California Street, 22nd Floor Telephone: (415) 947-2000
San Francisco, California 94111 Facsimile: (415) 947-2099
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Fax: (415) 875-6700 Attorneys for TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP.,
and EMILY LEPROUST
ANDREW J. BRAMHALL (S.B. #253115)
andrewbramhall@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Dr., Sth Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5113
10 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
11 Attorneys for TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP.,
EMILY LEPROUST, and ST'YUAN CHEN
12
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
13
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
14
CASE NO. 16-CV-291137
15 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Delaware Corporation,
SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY IN SUPPORT
16 OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
Plaintiff,
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF NO
17 TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION
Vv.
18
TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP., a Delaware
REDACTED FOR PUBLIC FILING
19 Corporation; EMILY LEPROUST, an
Individual; S'YUAN CHEN, an Individual 3
20 SOLANGE GLAIZE, an Individual; and
Action Filed: February 3, 2016
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Cross-Complaint Filed: January 29, 2019
21 Trial Date Set: February 24, 2020
Defendants.
Discovery Referee: Hon. James Ware (Ret.)
22 Location: Department 1
TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP. and EMILY
23 LEPROUST,
Cross-Complainants,
24
Vv.
25
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and
26 DOES | through 10, inclusive,
27 Cross-Defendants.
28
Case No. 16-CV-291137
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF
NO TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION
Agilent sidesteps the core of Twist’s argument: Ee
a
ee
ee
ee
ee
These facts are established by admissions of Agilent’s own witnesses. Agilent uses the word
“Disputed” in its RUF, but it does not dispute its own witness testimony in any way material here.
Acilen says it
Document Filed Date
January 24, 2020
Case Filing Date
February 03, 2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
16CV291137 Santa Clara — Civil Electronically Filed by Superior Court of CA, ReMiAMEAERY os se QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP WILSON & ROS. A 50204 CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN (S.B. # 170151) CHARLE; i ) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com tgraves@vwGaseo#l 6CV291137 MELISSA J. BAILY (S.B. #237649) One MarkdEieeto, BIBSBOHH Suite 3300 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 50 California Street, 22nd Floor Telephone: (415) 947-2000 San Francisco, California 94111 Facsimile: (415) 947-2099 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Fax: (415) 875-6700 Attorneys for TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP., and EMILY LEPROUST ANDREW J. BRAMHALL (S.B. #253115) andrewbramhall@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., Sth Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5113 10 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 11 Attorneys for TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP., EMILY LEPROUST, and ST'YUAN CHEN 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 14 CASE NO. 16-CV-291137 15 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY IN SUPPORT 16 OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR Plaintiff, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF NO 17 TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION Vv. 18 TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP., a Delaware REDACTED FOR PUBLIC FILING 19 Corporation; EMILY LEPROUST, an Individual; S'YUAN CHEN, an Individual 3 20 SOLANGE GLAIZE, an Individual; and Action Filed: February 3, 2016 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Cross-Complaint Filed: January 29, 2019 21 Trial Date Set: February 24, 2020 Defendants. Discovery Referee: Hon. James Ware (Ret.) 22 Location: Department 1 TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP. and EMILY 23 LEPROUST, Cross-Complainants, 24 Vv. 25 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and 26 DOES | through 10, inclusive, 27 Cross-Defendants. 28 Case No. 16-CV-291137 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF NO TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION Agilent sidesteps the core of Twist’s argument: Ee a ee ee ee ee These facts are established by admissions of Agilent’s own witnesses. Agilent uses the word “Disputed” in its RUF, but it does not dispute its own witness testimony in any way material here. Acilen says it