On December 29, 2017 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Judit Van Caenegem,
Sweetsuite, Llc,
and
Dennis B.K. Fong,
Dpjw Group Ii Lp,
Dpjw Group, Lp,
Dpjw Management, Llc,
for Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited(06)
in the District Court of Santa Clara County.
Preview
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Cherie J. Edson (Bar No. 208598)
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
333 Bush Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94104-2872
TeLePHONE NOo.: (415) 362-2580 FAX NO. (Optional): (415) 434-0882
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name: Defendants DENNIS B.K. FONG, DPJW GROUP II, LP
and DPJW MANAGEMENT. LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
street aporess: 191 N. First Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
cry ano zip cove: San Jose, CA 95113-1090
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: JUDIT VAN CAENEGEM, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DENNIS B.K. FONG, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
170V321225
(Check one): ® INLIMITED CASE O LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: December 3, 2019 Time: 10:00 a.m. Dept.: 9 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
I Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Cherie J. Edson
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a (1 This statement is submitted by party (name):
b. [This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Defendants DENNIS B.K. FONG, DPJW GROUP II, LP
and DPJW MANAGEMENT, LLC
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a The complaint was filed on (date):
b. [1] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a (1 sAllparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [1 The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) (shave had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. oO The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a Type of case in EX] complaint 1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Breach of contract, negligence
Page1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Ame in Legale
rms Work £01
“=
Fon Ecarannn ert A Fon.
ol
Panta ees bear ae Cord aac a STV
1) Ty
STATE Ae A COLA) Ob SAMA 11 APA
A ie Lee
Cl crv, J ce ver 1 es = edone a ee een 5
Papen ake 01 hah Spe, Suir | 00, es fo oh
a Paget 16, 00, | mcr hea (rd Ling deen, AEE MA AlpoiorT
STA T=MEST
2 re) Pe es 8) Ee Biiisaiag parse at Gey Bolcaing eiiiienmes Gitiduerg Dice
moms
nd cel) Rairsaars, H igpticale:
fal te oped is Fre Par
1] i ieee
i sae, CA Ta, MAS Ss:
Excel, Pade oer:
It
The theo rors eevee Eesha Pligg ere
14
CIWS PUR 2S hee oe dec a SOS a1 eee ec
ce
Ge Peeters rireFed ce ge]
a Placge]
Ue eta i oldecrioc
wed ral
Poe prec | ae Petey fleetofan
wel Gar ir re ed
olive Due oo
> | pregleatea
[rt fr oe
=
Ter eclicg?
pombe
Lemire a
oe Sep 20) POO
a =P Spe Shoe ey Line
cere Comes of Sco
/
Wt
:
ube Cl 5
=
7
—o ne paige me LE ee peer Fal pepe.
Ht = Boclare creier posits =( Soup uote Lee bers nib ee fad
fer Led Lee
Teregalag 2 eed ar
iu
Sspevied oo Avera 1A 921% gf) 09 Sree, Cale +
aa
a mts fo Rane
v
a
Document Filed Date
November 18, 2019
Case Filing Date
December 29, 2017
Category
Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited(06)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.