Preview
Michael G. Ackerman, Esq. (SBN 64997)
"
E L E
LAW OFFICES 0F MICHAEL G. ACKERMAN
2391 The Alameda, Suite 100
APR 0 9 2mg
Santa Clara, CA 95050
AWN
Telephone: (408) 261—5800 Clerk of the Court
Facsimile: (408) 261-5900
5”“ “3' n °' CA °°“"‘V 56"“ 0'“
°.'
Email: mga@mgackermanlaw.com
EY‘L e DEPUTY
f
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
PHIL RESTIVO
©°°VON
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
ll
PHILIP RESTIVO, Case No; 17CV308469
12 g
Plaintiff, ) JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT
13 )
vs. )
14 ) Trial Date; March 11, 2019
WORLDWIDE GROUND )
15 TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, INC; )
JAMES BROWN, an individual; and DOES )
i6 1 through 5, inclusive.
g
17 Defendants.
3
18
19 This action commenced trial by jury on March 11, 2019, with Plaintifi‘, Phil Restivo, appearing
20 through Michael G. Ackerman, his attorney. Defendant Worldwide Ground Transportation Solutions, Inc.
21 appeared through William R. Cumming and Nancy M. Battel, its attorneys. Ajury oftwelve persons and
22 one alternate was duly impaneled and sworn; witnesses testified and exhibits were admitted into
23 evidence; and after being duly instructed by the court, the jury deliberated and duly returned the special
24 verdict attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
25 By reason of this special verdict:
26 ///
27
28
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT Case No.: 17CV308469
1T IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED that judgnmt is entered in favor ofPlainu'E
Phil Rmtivo, and against Defendant, Worldwide Ground Transportation Solufions, Inc., in the tom]sum
of $60,000.00 on Plaintifi's complaint, together with costs recoverable under C.C.P. Secu'on 1033.5.
‘OOOQO‘U‘bUN-d
APPROVED AS T0 FORM:
DATED: g/H ,2019 C I I II GANDASSOCIATES,APLC
BY:
>—-
DATED: 3 “2/ 2019 LAW OFFICES OF NANCY M. BATTEL
wummamm—ocm3m3355:3
--—-
Tmnspomfion Solun'ons, Inc.
NNNNN
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT Cast No.: 17CV308469
#MN
FELE
MAR 1 8 2019
\OmflO‘LII
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
10
11
12 Case No. 17CV308469
13 P. RESTIVO,
14 Plaintiff, JURY VERDICT
15
16 VS.
17 WORLDWID GROUND TRANSPORTATION
SOLUTIONS, '
INC.,
18 Defendant
l9
20 above answer the questions submitted to us as follows:
We, the jury in the entitled matter,
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
VF-soo. BREACH 0F CONTRACT -_.-_.____.__....__——
We answer the quwtions submitted to us as follows:
l. Did Phil Restivo and Worldwide Ground Transpomfion Solutions cum into a ..
m.
contract entitled Mediated Scttlexmnt Agreement? m
wmamu-kwrQ
M Yw Nd
Ifyom'answerto'qumfion 1 isymthenanswm quesu'on 2. Ifyouansweredno, stophcre,
answernofimhegquestions, andhavetheprasidingjurorsipanddmthisfom
2. DidPhflRcsfivodoangrsfibsmnfiaHyalLofmesimifimflfingsthathcconuact
10 requiredhimtodo?
‘
11
._/Yois No
IfyomanswertoquwfionZisyegmcnskipquwhon3'andanswerquesfion4. Ifyou
answeredno, answerquestion3.
3.‘ WasPhnRufivoexcusedfiommmgmdomprsfibsmfialeanémc
sipificanttbingsthmthecommreqtfiredhimtodo?
Yes -
No
r
Ifyour answertoquesfionSisywfinenanswer-quesfioni Ifyouanswedno,stophem,
answerno W'quwfiongandhavemprwu‘d’mgjmor fipmddmthisfcnn.
4. -DidélltheeondiflonsoccmthatwerereqdredfagWorldwidon\md
Transportation Soltm'ons performance?
'
As No
Ifyour answerto question4 isyw, thonanswerquesfion 5. Ifyouanswemdno, stop here,
answm no further quwfions, andhave-the pmaidingjmor w and dme this foun.
_..._..-~_.___————
H 5'.
v
‘
‘
cOnW
[4
W
Did Worldwide Ground Transportation Solmions $11 to do something that file
Yes
it
‘
to do?
No
. r. ...... ‘ ... . . ~.~———_._.._—u.
....-.. ._..—..—.v..__
_..
..<
Ifyour answér to quesfion 5 -is yes, than answer qmfion 6. Ifyou have answered no, stofi
here, answer no further quwfions, and have .the presiding juror sign and date this fem.
Iso‘ooqa‘uuukwk"
6. .
Was Worldwide Ground Transportafion Sohm'ons excused fiom having to do all, or
'
substanfially all,ofthe significant things thm the contact required it to do?
I
Ya 34 No.
Ifyour answerto qumtions 6‘is yes, stop here, ahswer no further qumfions, andhavethe
prwifingjuror sipanddatethisform. Ifyouranswerto quwfion6isno,thenanswerquwflon7.
7. Was Phil Restivo banned by this failure?
.
n—An—IHHHHn—IH
14 Ya ___No
Ifyouranswcrto quesfion7isno,stophere,ahswetnofinthcgq1mfions,andhavethe
puddingjmor signapddmethisform. Ifyom'answerisymthmanswuqmfion 8.
8- WhathfiilRwfivo’s damagw? 4
‘
Tomlzfiéo COO 'EOI
day(fies RDGM‘ *0 WMAQZOH
'
i¢ '9“ a’j gfiu (‘2 C&Maj GS
SW:
12W
m .
”diam 20:1
[Afier it has hem siged/Afier all verdict forms have been dyed], dqliver this verdict form.
Preview
Michael G. Ackerman, Esq. (SBN 64997) " E L E LAW OFFICES 0F MICHAEL G. ACKERMAN 2391 The Alameda, Suite 100 APR 0 9 2mg Santa Clara, CA 95050 AWN Telephone: (408) 261—5800 Clerk of the Court Facsimile: (408) 261-5900 5”“ “3' n °' CA °°“"‘V 56"“ 0'“ °.' Email: mga@mgackermanlaw.com EY‘L e DEPUTY f Attorneys for Plaintiff, PHIL RESTIVO ©°°VON SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ll PHILIP RESTIVO, Case No; 17CV308469 12 g Plaintiff, ) JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT 13 ) vs. ) 14 ) Trial Date; March 11, 2019 WORLDWIDE GROUND ) 15 TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, INC; ) JAMES BROWN, an individual; and DOES ) i6 1 through 5, inclusive. g 17 Defendants. 3 18 19 This action commenced trial by jury on March 11, 2019, with Plaintifi‘, Phil Restivo, appearing 20 through Michael G. Ackerman, his attorney. Defendant Worldwide Ground Transportation Solutions, Inc. 21 appeared through William R. Cumming and Nancy M. Battel, its attorneys. Ajury oftwelve persons and 22 one alternate was duly impaneled and sworn; witnesses testified and exhibits were admitted into 23 evidence; and after being duly instructed by the court, the jury deliberated and duly returned the special 24 verdict attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 25 By reason of this special verdict: 26 /// 27 28 JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT Case No.: 17CV308469 1T IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED that judgnmt is entered in favor ofPlainu'E Phil Rmtivo, and against Defendant, Worldwide Ground Transportation Solufions, Inc., in the tom]sum of $60,000.00 on Plaintifi's complaint, together with costs recoverable under C.C.P. Secu'on 1033.5. ‘OOOQO‘U‘bUN-d APPROVED AS T0 FORM: DATED: g/H ,2019 C I I II GANDASSOCIATES,APLC BY: >—- DATED: 3 “2/ 2019 LAW OFFICES OF NANCY M. BATTEL wummamm—ocm3m3355:3 --—- Tmnspomfion Solun'ons, Inc. NNNNN JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT Cast No.: 17CV308469 #MN FELE MAR 1 8 2019 \OmflO‘LII SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 11 12 Case No. 17CV308469 13 P. RESTIVO, 14 Plaintiff, JURY VERDICT 15 16 VS. 17 WORLDWID GROUND TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, ' INC., 18 Defendant l9 20 above answer the questions submitted to us as follows: We, the jury in the entitled matter, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VF-soo. BREACH 0F CONTRACT -_.-_.____.__....__—— We answer the quwtions submitted to us as follows: l. Did Phil Restivo and Worldwide Ground Transpomfion Solutions cum into a .. m. contract entitled Mediated Scttlexmnt Agreement? m wmamu-kwrQ M Yw Nd Ifyom'answerto'qumfion 1 isymthenanswm quesu'on 2. Ifyouansweredno, stophcre, answernofimhegquestions, andhavetheprasidingjurorsipanddmthisfom 2. DidPhflRcsfivodoangrsfibsmnfiaHyalLofmesimifimflfingsthathcconuact 10 requiredhimtodo? ‘ 11 ._/Yois No IfyomanswertoquwfionZisyegmcnskipquwhon3'andanswerquesfion4. Ifyou answeredno, answerquestion3. 3.‘ WasPhnRufivoexcusedfiommmgmdomprsfibsmfialeanémc sipificanttbingsthmthecommreqtfiredhimtodo? Yes - No r Ifyour answertoquesfionSisywfinenanswer-quesfioni Ifyouanswedno,stophem, answerno W'quwfiongandhavemprwu‘d’mgjmor fipmddmthisfcnn. 4. -DidélltheeondiflonsoccmthatwerereqdredfagWorldwidon\md Transportation Soltm'ons performance? ' As No Ifyour answerto question4 isyw, thonanswerquesfion 5. Ifyouanswemdno, stop here, answm no further quwfions, andhave-the pmaidingjmor w and dme this foun. _..._..-~_.___———— H 5'. v ‘ ‘ cOnW [4 W Did Worldwide Ground Transportation Solmions $11 to do something that file Yes it ‘ to do? No . r. ...... ‘ ... . . ~.~———_._.._—u. ....-.. ._..—..—.v..__ _.. ..< Ifyour answér to quesfion 5 -is yes, than answer qmfion 6. Ifyou have answered no, stofi here, answer no further quwfions, and have .the presiding juror sign and date this fem. Iso‘ooqa‘uuukwk" 6. . Was Worldwide Ground Transportafion Sohm'ons excused fiom having to do all, or ' substanfially all,ofthe significant things thm the contact required it to do? I Ya 34 No. Ifyour answerto qumtions 6‘is yes, stop here, ahswer no further qumfions, andhavethe prwifingjuror sipanddatethisform. Ifyouranswerto quwfion6isno,thenanswerquwflon7. 7. Was Phil Restivo banned by this failure? . n—An—IHHHHn—IH 14 Ya ___No Ifyouranswcrto quesfion7isno,stophere,ahswetnofinthcgq1mfions,andhavethe puddingjmor signapddmethisform. Ifyom'answerisymthmanswuqmfion 8. 8- WhathfiilRwfivo’s damagw? 4 ‘ Tomlzfiéo COO 'EOI day(fies RDGM‘ *0 WMAQZOH ' i¢ '9“ a’j gfiu (‘2 C&Maj GS SW: 12W m . ”diam 20:1 [Afier it has hem siged/Afier all verdict forms have been dyed], dqliver this verdict form.