On April 12, 2017 a
Trial
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
James Brown,
for Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited(06)
in the District Court of Santa Clara County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER G. RUDY
DATE March 11, 2019 CASE NO.:17CV308469
TIME 9:00a.m. DEPARTMENT:
LAINTIFF COUNSEL:
PHILLIP RESTIVO Michael G. Ackerman, Esq.
VS.
DEFENNT: COUNSEL:
WORLDWIDE GROUND TRANSPORTATION William R. Cumming, Esq. and
SOLUTIONS, INC., et al Nancy M. Battel, Esq.
CLERK:Donna M. O’Hara REPORTER:Carly Tillotson, CSR#13627
TYPE OF PROCEEDING JURYTRIAL
9:07 am Thiscase is called on the record, Counsel and the parties are present as listed above. The Court
signs the Request for Appointment of Official Reporter Form. The Court asks if there is any
objection to plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint.The court states that itintends to GRANT
the motion. Defense counsel asthe Court to defer ruling on the motion until after furthe
discussions in chambers.
9:15 am Off the record, counsel meets with the Court in chambers.
10:52 am Back on the record, the Court rules on the following Motions in Limine:
Plaintiff:
To exclude from the courtroom any witness who are not being examined GRANTED
To exclude any mention in voir dire, opening statement or during the testimony of any witness any
mention or evidence of any other lawsuit or litigation Plaintiff, Phil Restivo and/or Restivo
Enterprises, Inc. may have been or is involved in other than this case. The Court listens to
argument and the motion is GRANTED, subject to d endant’sintro ductionof evidence in
dispute of the Court’s ruling.
To request that the court instruct counsel for Defendant that neither counsel nor any of their
witnesses shall comment upon the grant or a motion for summary adjudicationis GRANTED.
Defendant
To preclude arguments and evidence in conflict with the courts order regarding Summary
Judgment. The Court listens to argument and will rule on the motion tomorrow, March 12, 2019.
To preclude arguments and evidence regarding the enforceability and value of the non compete
clauseThe Court listens to argument and intends to GRANT the motion.
To limit the period of time plaintiff can claim damages.The Court lis tens to argument and the
17CV308469, RESTIVO VS. WORLDWIDE GROUND TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, INC., J. BROWN, et al.
Date: March 11, 2019 Page of
Court intends to GRANTthe motion, limited to damages prior to 9/15/15and will rule on the
motion tomorrow, March 12, 2019.
12:00 pm The Court clarifies that the Motion to Amend is GRANTED and that Mr. Brown is no longer a part
f this case.
12:02 pm The Court directs the clerk to order 60 jurors to be present tomorrow, March 12, 2019 at 2:00 pm.
The Court stands adjourned and will reconvene at 1:30 PM tomorrow afternoon.
Plaintiff’s counsellodges the deposition of James Brown, taken May 14, 2018 with the clerk.
17CV308469, RESTIVO VS. WORLDWIDE GROUND TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, INC., J. BROWN, et al.
Date: March 11, 2019 Page of
Document Filed Date
March 11, 2019
Case Filing Date
April 12, 2017
Category
Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited(06)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.