arrow left
arrow right
  • Philip Restivo vs Worldwide Ground Transportation Solutions, Inc. at el Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited(06)  document preview
  • Philip Restivo vs Worldwide Ground Transportation Solutions, Inc. at el Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited(06)  document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER G. RUDY DATE March 11, 2019 CASE NO.:17CV308469 TIME 9:00a.m. DEPARTMENT: LAINTIFF COUNSEL: PHILLIP RESTIVO Michael G. Ackerman, Esq. VS. DEFENNT: COUNSEL: WORLDWIDE GROUND TRANSPORTATION William R. Cumming, Esq. and SOLUTIONS, INC., et al Nancy M. Battel, Esq. CLERK:Donna M. O’Hara REPORTER:Carly Tillotson, CSR#13627 TYPE OF PROCEEDING JURYTRIAL 9:07 am Thiscase is called on the record, Counsel and the parties are present as listed above. The Court signs the Request for Appointment of Official Reporter Form. The Court asks if there is any objection to plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint.The court states that itintends to GRANT the motion. Defense counsel asthe Court to defer ruling on the motion until after furthe discussions in chambers. 9:15 am Off the record, counsel meets with the Court in chambers. 10:52 am Back on the record, the Court rules on the following Motions in Limine: Plaintiff: To exclude from the courtroom any witness who are not being examined GRANTED To exclude any mention in voir dire, opening statement or during the testimony of any witness any mention or evidence of any other lawsuit or litigation Plaintiff, Phil Restivo and/or Restivo Enterprises, Inc. may have been or is involved in other than this case. The Court listens to argument and the motion is GRANTED, subject to d endant’sintro ductionof evidence in dispute of the Court’s ruling. To request that the court instruct counsel for Defendant that neither counsel nor any of their witnesses shall comment upon the grant or a motion for summary adjudicationis GRANTED. Defendant To preclude arguments and evidence in conflict with the courts order regarding Summary Judgment. The Court listens to argument and will rule on the motion tomorrow, March 12, 2019. To preclude arguments and evidence regarding the enforceability and value of the non compete clauseThe Court listens to argument and intends to GRANT the motion. To limit the period of time plaintiff can claim damages.The Court lis tens to argument and the 17CV308469, RESTIVO VS. WORLDWIDE GROUND TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, INC., J. BROWN, et al. Date: March 11, 2019 Page of Court intends to GRANTthe motion, limited to damages prior to 9/15/15and will rule on the motion tomorrow, March 12, 2019. 12:00 pm The Court clarifies that the Motion to Amend is GRANTED and that Mr. Brown is no longer a part f this case. 12:02 pm The Court directs the clerk to order 60 jurors to be present tomorrow, March 12, 2019 at 2:00 pm. The Court stands adjourned and will reconvene at 1:30 PM tomorrow afternoon. Plaintiff’s counsellodges the deposition of James Brown, taken May 14, 2018 with the clerk. 17CV308469, RESTIVO VS. WORLDWIDE GROUND TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, INC., J. BROWN, et al. Date: March 11, 2019 Page of