On February 18, 2010 a
Stipulation,Agreement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Orozco Construction,
Orozco, Delfino,
and
Herrera, Hector,
for BREACH OF CONTRACT
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
oplng
Ting
ory,le 2a, Mey
My org
arr Loy
Cause No.: 2010-10730 CoN
aN
BRS
DELFINO OROZCO,
IN THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT
D/B/A OROZCO CONSTRUCTION 8
Plaintiff. §
VS. OF HARRIS COUNTY. TEXAS
HECTOR HERRERA
Defendant. 8 157™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Rule 11 Agreement
COME NOW, Plaintiff, Delfino Orozco and Defendant, Hector Herrera, and hereby enter into this
Rule 1] Agreement which provides as follows:
| The deposition of Defendant was duly noticed for May 18, 2011: however, due toa newly formed
conflict in Defense counsel's schedule, the parties have agrced to post-pone the deposition to another date.
>
2 The parties have agreed to reset the deposition trom May 18, 201) at 12:30 p.m. to Tuesday. May
31,2011 at 12:30 p.m. at the Trevifio Law Firm. Defense counsel represents that he is not now scheduled.
to any other trial on that date nor is he on call for trial for this date (May 31, 2011) cither. Defense counsel
represents that he has set this deposition for preferential setting in his office calendar.
4
3 Ihe partics further agree that no additional notice for the taking of Mr. Herrera’s deposition on
May 31. 2011 shall be neces: sary.
Signed:
MM, IS 2011
j'
oS HY}AZ LCL
Sergio A. Treviiio Jeff Hal
Attorney For Plaintiff Attorn ¢ Defendant
— —.- a —
Document Filed Date
May 23, 2011
Case Filing Date
February 18, 2010
Category
BREACH OF CONTRACT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
oplng Ting ory,le 2a, Mey My org arr Loy Cause No.: 2010-10730 CoN aN BRS DELFINO OROZCO, IN THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT D/B/A OROZCO CONSTRUCTION 8 Plaintiff. § VS. OF HARRIS COUNTY. TEXAS HECTOR HERRERA Defendant. 8 157™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT Rule 11 Agreement COME NOW, Plaintiff, Delfino Orozco and Defendant, Hector Herrera, and hereby enter into this Rule 1] Agreement which provides as follows: | The deposition of Defendant was duly noticed for May 18, 2011: however, due toa newly formed conflict in Defense counsel's schedule, the parties have agrced to post-pone the deposition to another date. > 2 The parties have agreed to reset the deposition trom May 18, 201) at 12:30 p.m. to Tuesday. May 31,2011 at 12:30 p.m. at the Trevifio Law Firm. Defense counsel represents that he is not now scheduled. to any other trial on that date nor is he on call for trial for this date (May 31, 2011) cither. Defense counsel represents that he has set this deposition for preferential setting in his office calendar. 4 3 Ihe partics further agree that no additional notice for the taking of Mr. Herrera’s deposition on May 31. 2011 shall be neces: sary. Signed: MM, IS 2011 j' oS HY}AZ LCL Sergio A. Treviiio Jeff Hal Attorney For Plaintiff Attorn ¢ Defendant — —.- a —