On May 23, 2012 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Siebert, Brenda,
and
Dodson, Speed,
Fitness Contractors,
Kelly Acquisition,
Kelly Acquisition Inc,
Kelly, David,
Kingwood Athletic Club,
Speed Dodson,
Speed Incorporated,
The Fitness Contractors,
for PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2012-30259
BRENDA SIEBERT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
Vv.
KINGWOOD ATHLETIC CLUB, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
KELLY ACQUISITION, INC.,
DAVID KELLY,
THE FITNESS CONTRACTORS, SPEED
INCORPORATED AND
SPEED DODSON 165TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS THE FITNESS CONTRACTORS, SPEED
INCORPORATED AND SPEED DODSON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND CONDITIONAL MOTION FOR SEVERENCE
CAME TO BE HEARD the following motions urged by Defendants The Fitness
Contractors, Speed Incorporated, and Speed Dodson:
« Defendants, The Fitness Contractors and Speed Dodson’s First Amended
Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment;
Defendants, The Fitness Contractors and Speed Dodson’s No-Evidence
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Cause of Action for
Negligence;
Defendants, The Fitness Contractors and Speed Dodson’s Conditional Motion
for Severance.
The Court, having considered the foregoing Motions, all responses, replies, and arguments of
counsel if any, is of the opinion that the motion is without merit, and should be and hereby is
DENIED.
Signed this the day of , 2013.
JUDGE PRESIDING
15
Document Filed Date
September 04, 2013
Case Filing Date
May 23, 2012
Category
PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2012-30259 BRENDA SIEBERT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Vv. KINGWOOD ATHLETIC CLUB, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS KELLY ACQUISITION, INC., DAVID KELLY, THE FITNESS CONTRACTORS, SPEED INCORPORATED AND SPEED DODSON 165TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS THE FITNESS CONTRACTORS, SPEED INCORPORATED AND SPEED DODSON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CONDITIONAL MOTION FOR SEVERENCE CAME TO BE HEARD the following motions urged by Defendants The Fitness Contractors, Speed Incorporated, and Speed Dodson: « Defendants, The Fitness Contractors and Speed Dodson’s First Amended Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendants, The Fitness Contractors and Speed Dodson’s No-Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Cause of Action for Negligence; Defendants, The Fitness Contractors and Speed Dodson’s Conditional Motion for Severance. The Court, having considered the foregoing Motions, all responses, replies, and arguments of counsel if any, is of the opinion that the motion is without merit, and should be and hereby is DENIED. Signed this the day of , 2013. JUDGE PRESIDING 15