On August 23, 2017 a
Defendant Stephanie Thompson's Original Answer - ORIGINAL ANSWER - GENERAL DENIAL
was filed
involving a dispute between
Murphy, Marty,
and
Labcon Inc,
Pavecon Holdings Co., Inc.,
Pavecon Ltd. Co.,
Pavecon Public Works Gp Llc,
Pavecon Public Works Lp,
Thompson, Stephanie,
Walker, C David,
for CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
FILED
DALLAS COUNTY
12/15/2017 8:39 AM
FELICIA PITRE
DISTRICT CLERK
CAUSE NO. DC-17-10592
MARTY MURPHY, IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff and Counterclaim-
Defendant,
V.
PAVECON HOLDING C0., INC.;
PAVECON LTD. CO.; and
PAVECON PUBLIC WORKS LP. mmwmmmmamwwmmmmmwm
192"“ DISTRICT COURT
Defendants and Counterclaim-
Plaintiffs;
STEPHANIE THOMPSON
Additional Counterclaim—
Defendant DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
DEFENDANT STEPHANIE THOMPSON’S ORIGINAL ANSWER
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES, STEPHANIE THOMPSON, Cellmterclaim-Defendant in the above
entitled and numbered cause of action, and files this her Original Answer and would respectfully
show the Court the following:
I.
Thompson generally denies each and every, all and singular, the allegations contained in
Defendants’ and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ (collectively, “Pavecon”) Original Counterclaims and
demands strict proof thereof as allowed under the laws 0f the State of Texas. By this general
denial, Thompson would require Pavecon to prove every fact to support the alleged claims in their
Original Counterclaims by a preponderance of the evidence.
Defendant Stephanie Thompson’s Original Answer Page 1
S. Thompson\Thompson defense\pleadings\Thompson’s Original Answer.docx
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant Thompson prays judgment ofthe
Court that the Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs take nothing by this suit, award Defendant
Thompson her costs of Court, and for such other and further relief whether at law or in equity to
which Defendant Thompson may show herself t0 be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
fsf David Fielding
David Fielding
State Bar No. 06974500
CANTEY HANGER LLP
600 West 6‘“ Suite 300
Street,
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
8 1 7-877-2800 (telephone)
817-877-2807 (facsimile)
d'fi eldinggbcanteyhzm gencom
\
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy 0f the foregoing has been served upon Counsel
for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs:
J. Robert Amett IIand Stacey Cho Hernandez
barnettflcarterscholencom
Stacey Cho Hernandez
shemandezfikarterscholancem
CARTER SCHOLER PLLC
and upon Plaintiff and counterclaim—Defendant Marty Murphy:
Connye Cashion
Charles H. Smith
CANTEY HANGER LLP
ccashiongiilcmlteyhangemom, c
chsm ithgalcamexhaugerxom
fs/David Fielding
Defendant Stephanie Thompson's Original Answer Page 2
S. Thompson\Thompson defense\pleadings\Thompson‘s Original Answer.docx
Document Filed Date
December 15, 2017
Case Filing Date
August 23, 2017
Category
CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FILED DALLAS COUNTY 12/15/2017 8:39 AM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK CAUSE NO. DC-17-10592 MARTY MURPHY, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff and Counterclaim- Defendant, V. PAVECON HOLDING C0., INC.; PAVECON LTD. CO.; and PAVECON PUBLIC WORKS LP. mmwmmmmamwwmmmmmwm 192"“ DISTRICT COURT Defendants and Counterclaim- Plaintiffs; STEPHANIE THOMPSON Additional Counterclaim— Defendant DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT STEPHANIE THOMPSON’S ORIGINAL ANSWER TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES, STEPHANIE THOMPSON, Cellmterclaim-Defendant in the above entitled and numbered cause of action, and files this her Original Answer and would respectfully show the Court the following: I. Thompson generally denies each and every, all and singular, the allegations contained in Defendants’ and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ (collectively, “Pavecon”) Original Counterclaims and demands strict proof thereof as allowed under the laws 0f the State of Texas. By this general denial, Thompson would require Pavecon to prove every fact to support the alleged claims in their Original Counterclaims by a preponderance of the evidence. Defendant Stephanie Thompson’s Original Answer Page 1 S. Thompson\Thompson defense\pleadings\Thompson’s Original Answer.docx WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant Thompson prays judgment ofthe Court that the Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs take nothing by this suit, award Defendant Thompson her costs of Court, and for such other and further relief whether at law or in equity to which Defendant Thompson may show herself t0 be justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, fsf David Fielding David Fielding State Bar No. 06974500 CANTEY HANGER LLP 600 West 6‘“ Suite 300 Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 8 1 7-877-2800 (telephone) 817-877-2807 (facsimile) d'fi eldinggbcanteyhzm gencom \ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy 0f the foregoing has been served upon Counsel for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs: J. Robert Amett IIand Stacey Cho Hernandez barnettflcarterscholencom Stacey Cho Hernandez shemandezfikarterscholancem CARTER SCHOLER PLLC and upon Plaintiff and counterclaim—Defendant Marty Murphy: Connye Cashion Charles H. Smith CANTEY HANGER LLP ccashiongiilcmlteyhangemom, c chsm ithgalcamexhaugerxom fs/David Fielding Defendant Stephanie Thompson's Original Answer Page 2 S. Thompson\Thompson defense\pleadings\Thompson‘s Original Answer.docx