On June 16, 2015 a
Order to Show Cause
was filed
involving a dispute between
Eng, Martin,
and
Castellanos, Marylou,
Does 1 To 1000 Inclusive,
Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Lender Processing Services, Inc.,
Quality Loan Service Corporation Erroneously Sued,
Quality Loan Services,
Sotheby'S International Realty,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OUI O
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
dul-10-2017 4:41 pm
Case Number: CGC-15-546377
Filing Date: Jul-10-2017 4:40
Filed by: JOSE RIOS-MERIDA
Image: 05939031
ORDER
MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (PItf 170.6 Challenge
Judge Quidachay)
001005939031
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7 FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
BRYAN CAVE LLP
Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604
Goli Mahdavi, California Bar No. 245705
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 675-3400
Facsimile: (415) 675-3434
E-Mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com
goli.mahdavi@bryancave.com
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Fide di dD
JUL 1 02017
CLERK COURT
BY
Deputy Clerk’
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
MARTIN ENG,
Plaintiff,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;
QUALITY LOAN SERVICES; LENDER.
PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1I-
1000 inclusive,
Defendants.
SFOIDOCS\305061.1
Case No. CGC-15-546377
o
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RE: CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS
10
Date: July N, 2017
Time: 9:80 a.m.
Dept.: 302 - DISCOVERY
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
June 16, 2015
August 21, 2017
rPROPIAEDI ORDERBRYAN Cave LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7™ FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
TO PLAINTIFF MARTIN ENG:
Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”) has presented to this Court
sufficient grounds to initiate contempt proceedings; therefore, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED
to appear on August F 2017 at 130. a.m/p-mt-in Department 302 of the above entitled court,
located at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, California 94102, to show cause as to why you
should not be held in contempt of this Court’s Order dated February 3, 2017 (the “Order”,
ordering you to pay Defendant $2,150 in monetary sanctions.
In particular, you are ordered to show cause why:
1. Plaintiff should not be held in contempt for willfully failing to comply with the
Order, and that Plaintiff not be imprisoned up to five (5) days in jail and/or ordered to pay a fine in
the amount of $1,000;
2. Plaintiff should not pay to the Court a sum of at least $1,500, pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure section 177.5 and California Rule of Court Rule 2.30; and
3. Plaintiff should not pay to Defendant its legal fees and costs incurred in this
contempt and sanctions proceeding, in the sum of at least $2,425.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any opposition papers to the Order to Show Cause
shiall be filed and served on Defendant by e-mail and overnight delivery to Defendant’s counsel no
later than Joly 25, of T any reply papers to the opposition shall be filed and served on counsel
for Plaintiff by e-mail and overnight delivery no later than Agust j 20 7
IT IS SO ORDERED
bated 0/12 / Mukd BAL
Judge of the Superior Couft of San Francisco County
Lor’, RICHARD ULMER
SFO1DOCS\305061.1
Zi
me ORDER
Document Filed Date
July 10, 2017
Case Filing Date
June 16, 2015
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OUI O SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet dul-10-2017 4:41 pm Case Number: CGC-15-546377 Filing Date: Jul-10-2017 4:40 Filed by: JOSE RIOS-MERIDA Image: 05939031 ORDER MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (PItf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) 001005939031 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BRYAN CAVE LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7 FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604 Goli Mahdavi, California Bar No. 245705 Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 675-3400 Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 E-Mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com goli.mahdavi@bryancave.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Fide di dD JUL 1 02017 CLERK COURT BY Deputy Clerk’ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICES; LENDER. PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1I- 1000 inclusive, Defendants. SFOIDOCS\305061.1 Case No. CGC-15-546377 o [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS 10 Date: July N, 2017 Time: 9:80 a.m. Dept.: 302 - DISCOVERY Complaint Filed: Trial Date: June 16, 2015 August 21, 2017 rPROPIAEDI ORDERBRYAN Cave LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7™ FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 TO PLAINTIFF MARTIN ENG: Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”) has presented to this Court sufficient grounds to initiate contempt proceedings; therefore, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED to appear on August F 2017 at 130. a.m/p-mt-in Department 302 of the above entitled court, located at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, California 94102, to show cause as to why you should not be held in contempt of this Court’s Order dated February 3, 2017 (the “Order”, ordering you to pay Defendant $2,150 in monetary sanctions. In particular, you are ordered to show cause why: 1. Plaintiff should not be held in contempt for willfully failing to comply with the Order, and that Plaintiff not be imprisoned up to five (5) days in jail and/or ordered to pay a fine in the amount of $1,000; 2. Plaintiff should not pay to the Court a sum of at least $1,500, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5 and California Rule of Court Rule 2.30; and 3. Plaintiff should not pay to Defendant its legal fees and costs incurred in this contempt and sanctions proceeding, in the sum of at least $2,425. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any opposition papers to the Order to Show Cause shiall be filed and served on Defendant by e-mail and overnight delivery to Defendant’s counsel no later than Joly 25, of T any reply papers to the opposition shall be filed and served on counsel for Plaintiff by e-mail and overnight delivery no later than Agust j 20 7 IT IS SO ORDERED bated 0/12 / Mukd BAL Judge of the Superior Couft of San Francisco County Lor’, RICHARD ULMER SFO1DOCS\305061.1 Zi me ORDER