Motion,Ex Parte: CRUZ, BALTASAR D vs. VEGA, MARISOL

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                BALTASAR D. CRUZ,                                         §             IN THE DISTRICT COURT


                                                                            §             234th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

                  MARISOL VEGA and HOUSTON
                  PUERTO RICAN RESTAURANT, LLC,                             §
                                             Defendants.                    §             HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

                                            PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY JUDGMENT

                  TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

                           NOW     COMES       BALTASAR         D.  CRUZ     (hereinafter   also  referred   to as  “Plaintiff”),  the

                  Plaintiff in the above-styled and numbered cause, and pursuant to Rule 329b(g) of the Texas Rules

                  of  Civil  Procedure    files  this, Plaintiff’s  Motion    to  Modify    Judgment,    and   in  support   of  same

                  respectfully shows:

                                                                            I.

                  1.1      A bench trial was conducted in this case on July 7 and 8, 2015 at the conclusion of which this

                  Court recited its rulings, stating that it was awarding Plaintiff damages in the amount of $32,773.83

                  against Defendant Houston Puerto Rican Restaurant, L.L.C. for breach of one of the agreements

                  which was the subject of this lawsuit, damages against Marisol Vega and Houston Puerto Rican

                  Restaurant, L.L.C., jointly, in the amount of $2,570.50 for breach of the other agreement which was

                  the subject of this lawsuit, and his court costs, as evidenced by the transcript of said rulings which

                  was prepared by Norma Duarte, the official Court Reporter of this Court, an accurate copy of which

                  is attached as exhibit “A” hereto.

                  1.2      However, when the Court subsequently entered a judgment in this case on August 17, 2015,

                  it did not award Plaintiff his court costs.

                  1.3      Rule 131 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “the successful party to a suit


                  PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY JUDGMENT                                                                        Page 1
                  BCMV.ModifyJdgmt.Mtn