Order: WARWICK AMUSEMENTS CORPORATION, ET AL VS. APPLIED UNDERWRITERS, INC., A NEBRASKA CORPORATION ET AL

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                UO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Mar-01-2018 4:28 pm

Case Number: CGC-16-551614
Filing Date: Mar-01-2018 4:27
Filed by: WILLIAM TRUPEK

Image: 06237273
ORDER

WARWICK AMUSEMENTS CORPORATION, ET AL VS. APPLIED
UNDERWRITERS, INC., ANEBRASKA CORPORATION ET AL

001006237273

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.SPENCER Y. KOOK (SBN 205304)
skook@hinshawlaw.com

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP MAR 1 2018
633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor

os Angeles, CA 90071-2043 CLERK OF THE COURT
Telephone: 213-680-2800 BY: x =
Facsimile: 213-614-7399 . “Deputy Clerk

TRAVIS WALL (SBN 191662)
twall@hinshawlaw.com

JARED W. MATHESON (SBN 275459)
jmatheson@hinshawlaw.com
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
One California Street, 18th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-362-6000
Facsimile: 415-834-9070

Attorneys for Defendants APPLIED UNDERWRITERS, INC., APPLIED UNDERWRITERS
CAPTIVE RISK ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY,
CONTINENTAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and APPLIED RISK SERVICES, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
WARWICK AMUSEMENTS CORPORATION, a ) Case No. CGC-16-551614
Delaware corporation, WARWICK CALIFORNIA —)
CORPORATION, a California corporation, ) He
WARWICK DENVER CORPORATION, a ) :
Delaware corporation, WSF BEVERAGE ) PROPOSED) ORDER RE:
tee PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
CORPORATION, a California corporation, ) JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
WARWICK MELROSE DALLAS sILV! )
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, ER ) g: spd.
AUTUMN HOTEL (N.Y.) CORPORATION, LTD., ) First Amended Complaint Filed:
a Delaware corporation, J lay Maye. we ot
Plaintiffs, 3 ury inal May 2"
vs. ) Date: March 1, 2018
APPLIED UNDERWRITERS, INC., a Nebraska } Time: 9:30 a.m.
corporation, APPLIED UNDERWRITERS ) Dept: 302
CAPTIVE RISK ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., ) Reservation Number: 01310301-07
an Iowa corporation, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE )
COMPANY, a California corporation, )
CONTINENTAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, an )
Towa corporation, APPLIED RISK SERVICES, )
INC., a New York corporation, and DOES 1 through J
50, inclusive , )
Defendants. )
)
WA

(oy

[RROROSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS}
CASE NO. CGC-16-551614APPLIED UNDERWRITERS CAPTIVE RISK )
ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., an Iowa corporation)
and CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, a
California corporation,

Cross-Complainants,
vs.
WARWICK CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a

California corporation and WSF BEVERAGE
CORPORATION, a California corporation,

Cross-Defendants.

meme

aK
FEROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed Plaintiffs Warwick Amusements Corporation, Warwick California
Corporation, Warwick Denver Corporation, WSF Beverage Corporation, Warwick Melrose Dallas
Corporation, Silver Autumn Hotel (N.Y.) Corporation, Ltd.'s Motion for Judgment on The Pleadings
and based upon the briefs and arguments of the parties and counsel, the Court finds as follows:

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied. The motion is not a proper
motion for judgment on the pleadings. To the extent the motion seeks a ruling on the permissible
scope of discovery, plaintiffs should file a motion for protective order or assert objections to
discovery served on them. In either event, it is not possible to intelligently resolve such a motion
outside the context of specific discovery requests that either have been served or threatened to be
served. To the extent that the motion seeks a ruling on the permissible scope of trial evidence,
a

plaintiffs should file a motion in limine to be heard by the trial judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: she
Zp) —~.

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
HAROLD KAHN

He 1

[PROESSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Case No. CGC-16-551614