Preview
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
ALICIA M. ARUNDEL; SUZANNE VERIFIED ANSWER TO
SCHULMAN, as Administratrix of the Estate BARUCH’S AMENDED
of BRITTNEY M. SCHULMAN, deceased; COMPLAINT WITH
OLGA LIPETS; MINDY GRABINA, as CROSS COMPLAINT
Administratrix of the Estate of AMY
GRABINA, and MINDY GRABINA,
Individually; STEVEN BARUCH, as
Administrator of the Estate of LAUREN
BARUCH, deceased and STEVEN BARUCH,
Individually; JOELLE DIMONTE; and
MELISSA A. CRAI,
Plaintiffs,
-against- Index No.
600055/2016
ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE INC.,
CARLOS PINO, ROMEO DIMON MARINE
SERVICE, INC., STEVEN ROMEO, TOWN
OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,
CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC., d/b/a
ROYALE LIMOUSINE and "XYZ
COMPANIES 1-5" name being fictitious but
intended to be the remanufacturers,
distributors, and/or sellers of the 2007 Lincoln
Town Car stretch limousine involved in the
collision,
Defendants.
Defendant, County of Suffolk, by their attorney, Dennis M. Brown, Suffolk County
Attorney, by Christopher A. Jeffreys, Assistant County Attorney, answering plaintiff's complaint
herein, respectfully alleges upon information and belief:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 1 of the Complaint and refers all questions of law to the Court.
1
1 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
2. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 in the Complaint.
3. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 9 of the Complaint, except admits that at all times hereinafter
mentioned, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK was and still is a municipal corporation existing, and
operating under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS:
ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE INC., CARLOS PINO,
ROMEO DIMON MARINE SERVICE, INC., AND STEVEN ROMEO
4. Answering paragraph numbered 12 of the Complaint, defendant repeats, reiterates
and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1 through 11
inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein.
5. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30
in the Complaint.
6. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 19, 25, 31, and 32 of the Complaint and refers all questions of
law to the Court.
7. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 33, and 34 of the
Complaint.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT
ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE INC.,
8. Answering paragraph numbered 35 of the Complaint, defendant repeats, reiterates
and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1 through 34
2
2 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein.
9. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 in the Complaint.
10. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 43 of the Complaint and refers all questions of law to the
Court.
11. Denies allegations contained in paragraph numbered 44 of the Complaint.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT
ROMEO DIMON MARINE SERVICE, INC.
12. Answering paragraph numbered 45 of the Complaint, defendant repeats, reiterates
and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1 through 44
inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein.
13. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, and 52 in the Complaint.
14. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 53 of the Complaint and refers all questions of law to the
Court.
15. Denies allegations contained in paragraph numbered 54 of the Complaint.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT
SOUTHOLD
16. Answering paragraph numbered 55 of the Complaint, defendant repeats, reiterates
and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1 through 54
inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein.
3
3 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
17. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 65, 66, 67, and 68 in the Complaint.
18. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 62, 63, and 69 of the Complaint and refers all questions of
law to the Court.
19. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 64, and 70 of the
Complaint.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
20. Answering paragraph numbered 71 of the Complaint, defendant repeats, reiterates
and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1 through 70
inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein.
21. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 72 of the Complaint, except admits that at all times hereinafter
mentioned, defendant COUNTY OF SUFFOLK owned a public highway known as Middle Road
(County Road 48).
22. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 80, and
86 of the Complaint.
23. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 78, 82, and 85 of the
Complaint and refers all questions of law to the Court.
24. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 79 of the Complaint and refers all questions of law to the
Court.
4
4 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
25. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 81 in the Complaint.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS
CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC., d/b/a ROYALE LIMOUSINE,
ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE, INC., AND “XYZ COMPANIES 1-5”
26. Answering paragraph numbered 87 of the Complaint, defendant repeats, reiterates
and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1 through 86
inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein.
27. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103, 107,
108, 109, 110, 113, 114, and 115 in the Complaint.
28. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 97, 101, 104, 105, and 106 of the Complaint and refers all
questions of law to the Court.
29. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 111, 112, 116, 117, and 118
of the Complaint.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS
CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC., d/b/a ROYALE LIMOUSINES,
“XYZ COMPANIES 1-5” and ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE, INC.
30. Answering paragraph numbered 119 of the Complaint, defendant repeats,
reiterates and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1
through 118 inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length
herein.
31. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
5
5 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
contained in paragraphs numbered 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131,
134, and 135 in the Complaint.
32. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 132, 133, 137, and 138 of
the Complaint.
33. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 136 of the Complaint and refers all questions of law to the
Court.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS
CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC., d/b/a ROYALE LIMOUSINES,
“XYZ COMPANIES 1-5” and ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE, INC.
34. Answering paragraph numbered 139 of the Complaint, defendant repeats,
reiterates and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1
through 138 inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length
herein.
35. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 140, and 143 in the Complaint.
36. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraphs numbered 141, and 144 of the Complaint and refers all questions of law
to the Court.
37. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 142, 145, and 146 of the
Complaint.
AS AND FOR DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS
NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
38. Answering paragraph numbered 147 of the Complaint, defendant repeats,
6
6 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
reiterates and realleges each and every admission and denial to the paragraphs numbered 1
through 146 inclusive, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length
herein.
39. Denies allegations contained in paragraphs numbered 148, 149, 150, and 152 of
the Complaint.
40. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to allegations
contained in paragraph numbered 151 of the Complaint and refers all questions of law to the
Court.
AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
41. That if the plaintiff(s) was caused to sustain damages at the time and place set
forth in the plaintiff's complaint, such injuries and/or damages were sustained by said plaintiff(s)
in whole or in part by reason of the carelessness, recklessness, negligence and/or negligent act of
omission or commission of the culpable conduct of said plaintiff(s), and defendant(s) plead such
culpable conduct and acts of negligence in diminution of damages.
AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
42. That all the risks and dangers connected with the situation at the time and place
mentioned in the complaint were open, obvious and apparent, and were known to and assumed
by the plaintiff(s) herein.
AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
43. That plaintiff(s) failed to make use of seat belts in the car plaintiff(s) occupied.
44. That by reason thereof, plaintiffs' damages were aggravated and enhanced.
45. That plaintiff(s) are barred from recovery for that part of damages which would
have been prevented by wearing seat belts.
7
7 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
46. That if the plaintiff(s) recovers herein against two or more tort-feasors jointly
liable and/or if the culpable conduct of any person not a party to this action is considered in
determining any equitable share herein and if this answering defendant's liability is 50 percent or
less of the total liability assigned, then this answering defendant's liability for non economic loss
shall not exceed the equitable share as determined by this answering defendant's percentage of
liability for non economic loss pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Article 16.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
47. That this action is barred as against the defendant COUNTY OF SUFFOLK for
lack of prior written notice to the County of the defective condition, pursuant to Section C8-2A
of the Suffolk County Charter.
AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
48. That this action is barred by the doctrines of qualified and/or absolute
governmental immunity for discretionary acts.
AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
49. That the Plaintiff’s action against the County of Suffolk is barred by the holdings
of Weiss v. Fote, 7N.Y.2d 579 (1960); Friedman v. Cataldo, 67 N.Y.2d 271 (1986); Schuster v.
McDonald, 263 A.D.2d 473 (2d Dept. 1999), and their progeny.
AS AND FOR A CROSS-COMPLAINT AGAINST
CO-DEFENDANTS, ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE INC.,
CARLOS PINO, ROMEO DIMON MARINE SERVICE, INC.,
STEVEN ROMEO, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,
CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC., d/b/a ROYALE LIMOUSINE and
"XYZ COMPANIES 1-5" ANSWERING DEFENDANT:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ALLEGES UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF:
50. That if the plaintiffs recoves herein against answering defendant, such recovery
8
8 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
will have been caused and brought about by reason of the negligence of the co-defendants, by
agents, servants and/or employees, which said negligence will have been primary and the
negligence, if any, of answering defendant will be secondary, and answering defendant will be
entitled to judgment against the co-defendants in any amount the plaintiffs may recover herein
or, in the alternate, to a determination of the comparative degrees of negligence of the said
defendant, and to a judgment over in accordance with such determination.
WHEREFORE, defendant, County of Suffolk, demands judgment, dismissing the
plaintiff's complaint herein, with costs and disbursements or, in the alternate, for judgment over
and against the co-defendants in any amount plaintiffs may recover against answering defendant,
and/or to a determination of the respective degrees of negligence, and for judgment over and
against said co-defendants in accordance therewith, together with the costs and disbursements
hereof.
DATED: Hauppauge, New York
April 27, 2017
Yours, etc.
Dennis M. Brown
Suffolk County Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
County of Suffolk
H. Lee Dennison Building
100 Veterans Memorial Highway
P.O. Box 6100
Hauppauge, New York 11788-0099
(631) 853-4049
BY: /s/ Christopher A. Jeffreys
Christopher A. Jeffreys
Assistant County Attorney
9
9 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
TO: SULLIVAN PAPAIN BLOCK McGRATH & CANNAVA PC.
Attorney(s) for Plaintiff
1140 Franklin Avenue, Suite 200
Garden City, New York 11530
Robert G. Smith
516-742-0707
JOHN L. JULIANO PC
39 Doyle court
East Northport, NY 11731
AHMUTY DEMERS & McMANUS
200 I.U. Willets Road
Albertson, NY 11507
LEWIS JOHS AVALLONE AVILES LLP
One CA Plaza, Suite 225
Islandia, NY 11749
CASCONE & KLEUPFEL LLP
1399 Franklin Avenue, Suite 302
Garden City, NY 11530
DEVITT SPELLMAN & BARRETT LLP
50 Route 111
Smithtown, NY 11788
BONGIORNO LAW FIRM, PLLC
1415 Kellum Place, Suite 205
Garden City, NY 11530
PEGALIS & ERICKSON, LLC
One Hollow Lane, Suite 107
Lake Success, NY 11042
FRANK J. LAINE P.C.
449 South Oyster Bay Road
Plainview, NY 11803
JOSEPH J. TOCK, ESQ
964 Route 6
Mahopac, NY 10541
BLOCK, O’TOOLE & MURPHY LLP
One Penn Plaza, Suite 5315
New York, NY 10119
10
10 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
PARIS & CHAIKIN PLLC
14 Penn Plaza, Suite 2202
New York, NY 10122
CABOT COACH BUILDERS INC. d/b/a Royale Limousine
99 Newark Street
Haverville, MA 01832-1348
11
11 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
RIDER
TO: SULLIVAN PAPAIN BLOCK McGRATH & CANNAVA PC.
Attorney(s) for Plaintiff
1140 Franklin Avenue, Suite 200
Garden City, New York 11530
Robert G. Smith
516-742-0707
JOHN L. JULIANO PC
39 Doyle court
East Northport, NY 11731
AHMUTY DEMERS & McMANUS
200 I.U. Willets Road
Albertson, NY 11507
LEWIS JOHS AVALLONE AVILES LLP
One CA Plaza, Suite 225
Islandia, NY 11749
CASCONE & KLEUPFEL LLP
1399 Franklin Avenue, Suite 302
Garden City, NY 11530
DEVITT SPELLMAN & BARRETT LLP
50 Route 111
Smithtown, NY 11788
BONGIORNO LAW FIRM, PLLC
1415 Kellum Place, Suite 205
Garden City, NY 11530
PEGALIS & ERICKSON, LLC
One Hollow Lane, Suite 107
Lake Success, NY 11042
FRANK J. LAINE P.C.
449 South Oyster Bay Road
Plainview, NY 11803
JOSEPH J. TOCK, ESQ
964 Route 6
Mahopac, NY 10541
12
12 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
BLOCK, O’TOOLE & MURPHY LLP
One Penn Plaza, Suite 5315
New York, NY 10119
PARIS & CHAIKIN PLLC
14 Penn Plaza, Suite 2202
New York, NY 10122
CABOT COACH BUILDERS INC. d/b/a Royale Limousine
99 Newark Street
Haverville, MA 01832-1348
13
13 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
The undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the Courts of New York State,
shows:
1. Deponent is associated with the office of Dennis M. Brown, Suffolk County Attorney,
and attorney for defendant(s) County of Suffolk.
2. Deponent has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof, and the same is true to
deponent's own knowledge except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged upon information
and belief and as to those matters deponent believes it to be true.
3. This verification is made as to the COUNTY OF SUFFOLK because said County is a
Municipal Corporation and deponent is an Officer thereof: an Assistant County Attorney. This
verification is made as to any other defendant(s) as his/their attorney.
4. The grounds of deponent's belief as to all matters not stated upon deponent's own
knowledge are: (a) public records, (b) work product, (c) personal investigation, (d)
correspondence and interviews with defendant(s), their deputies, agents and employees, (e) or
that they are matters of law; if this verification is made for a non-corporate party the material
allegations are within deponent's personal knowledge based on the foregoing.
5. The undersigned affirms that the foregoing statements are true under the penalties of
perjury.
DATED: Hauppauge, New York
April 27, 2017
/s/ Christopher A. Jeffreys
Christopher A. Jeffreys
Assistant County Attorney
14
14 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
ALICIA M. ARUNDEL; SUZANNE DEMAND FOR VERIFIED
SCHULMAN, as Administratrix of the Estate BILL OF PARTICULARS
of BRITTNEY M. SCHULMAN, deceased;
OLGA LIPETS; MINDY GRABINA, as
Administratrix of the Estate of AMY
GRABINA, and MINDY GRABINA,
Individually; STEVEN BARUCH, as
Administrator of the Estate of LAUREN
BARUCH, deceased and STEVEN BARUCH,
Individually; JOELLE DIMONTE; and
MELISSA A. CRAI,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
Index No. 600055/2016
ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE INC.,
CARLOS PINO, ROMEO DIMON MARINE
SERVICE, INC., STEVEN ROMEO, TOWN
OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,
CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC., d/b/a
ROYALE LIMOUSINE and "XYZ
COMPANIES 1-5" name being fictitious but
intended to be the remanufacturers,
distributors, and/or sellers of the 2007 Lincoln
Town Car stretch limousine involved in the
collision,
Defendants.
SIR/MADAM:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the defendant(s) hereby demand that plaintiff(s) serve on
the undersigned, within twenty (20) days from the date of service hereof, a verified bill of
particulars with respect to the following matters:
1. State decedent's full name, date and place of birth and residence during the past five (5)
years.
15
15 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
2. State whether decedent was married or single; and if married, give the full name of their
spouse and their address, if not the same as their own and the reason for the different
addresses.
3. State whether the decedent has ever been known by any other name; and if so, give the
other name or names and state whether and when they used such names.
4. Has the decedent's name ever been legally changed; and if so, state, when, where and
through what procedure.
5. State the date and exact time of accident.
6. State the name of the road, street, or highway on which the accident described in the
complaint occurred and the nearest intersecting road, street, or highway so as to locate the
place of accident, giving the compass direction in which one vehicle mentioned in the
complaint was proceeding.
7. State whether any other vehicle was involved in the accident; and if so:
a) State the name of the owner and of the operator of the other vehicle.
b) State the address of the owner and operator of the other vehicle.
c) State the registration number of the other vehicle.
8. State the road conditions -- that is whether dry, wet or slippery.
9. State whether it was dark, light, cloudy, etc.
10. State whether the roads where the accident occurred were an electrically lighted highway.
11. State the speed at which each vehicle was proceeding just before and at a distance 200
feet before the place of contact.
12. If at the time of the alleged accident decedent engaged in gainful occupation, state the
wages or salary that he or she was receiving at the time.
13. A statement of any other expenses incurred on account of the occurrence set forth in the
complaint and for what incurred.
14. As to the deceased:
Total amounts, if any, claimed as special damages:
a) physician's services;
b) medical supplies;
c) hospital expenses;
16
16 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
d) nurses' services;
e) funeral expenses;
f) Loss of earnings, with name and address of employer; if self-employed, so state
and indicate the name and address under which decedent was doing business.
15. If loss of service is alleged, state how long and between what dates such loss of services
will be claimed.
16. Set forth by Chapter, Article, Section and Paragraph each and every statute or ordinance,
if any, which it is claimed the defendant violated.
17. Set forth the date of death of plaintiff's decedent and age at the time of death.
18. Set forth an itemized account of the expenditures incurred for the funeral and burial of
plaintiff's decedent.
19. The respective names, ages, resident addresses and relationship of the next of kin who
survive the death of plaintiff's decedent.
20. State the monetary amount of the deceased's contribution to those survivors
simultaneously.
21. State the gross earnings of the deceased for the past three years.
22. Have you received any medical, hospital or x-ray reports for any hospital or physician
concerning the injuries to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's decedent alleged to have been
caused by said accident?
23. If so, what is the date of each?
24. If so, where and from whom were such reports received?
25. If so, what type of reports were received in each instance (written or oral, medical, x-ray,
hospital, etc.)?
26. If so, what is the name and address of the place or custody of each report.
27. State the nature, extent, location and duration of each alleged injury and description of
any injuries claimed to be permanent.
28. If any time elapsed between the alleged accident and the death of the decedent, state how
much time elapsed and for how much of that time the decedent was conscious.
29. Statement setting forth the cause of death of the decedent.
17
17 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
30. A statement of the injuries alleged to have been sustained by the decedent which it is
claimed caused the death.
31. State the length of time, if any, plaintiff was confined to a) bed, b) house, and c) if treated
at or confined to a hospital, the name and address thereof and the dates and times of
admission and discharge.
32. State the date plaintiff was appointed Executrix of the Estate of the plaintiff's decedent
and the court of appointment, together with a copy thereof.
33. Set forth a true copy of the Death Certificate.
34. If decedent was a student at the time of the occurrence, state name and address of school
or institute where decedent was studying and the class or year and course of study.
35. If recovery is sought for the cost of medical care, dental care, custodial care or
rehabilitation services, loss of earnings or other economic loss, state whether any such
cost or expense has been, or will be, indemnified by any insurance, social security,
workers' compensation or employee benefit programs.
36. If the answer to the preceding demand is yes, specify the cost or expense reimbursed, the
amount of the reimbursements and the source.
37. State whether plaintiff claims that payment by any collateral sources create a legal lien on
any recovery in this action. If so, specify the lien claimed and the present amount.
38. With respect to any collateral source payment claimed, state whether plaintiff claims to
have paid a premium for the collateral source benefit and specify the amount of the
premium paid by plaintiff for the two years preceding the accident.
39. With respect to any collateral source payment claimed for which plaintiff paid a
premium, specify the projected future cost to the plaintiff of maintaining the benefit.
40. A statement of the acts or omissions constituting the negligence claimed.
41. Set forth plaintiff(s) social security number(s).
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the foregoing demand is a continuing demand.
In the event any of the above items are obtained after service of this demand, or service of a
response thereto, they are to be furnished to the undersigned forthwith.
18
18 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
DATED: Hauppauge, New York
April 27, 2017
Yours, etc.
Dennis M. Brown
Suffolk County Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
County of Suffolk
H. Lee Dennison Building
100 Veterans Memorial Highway
P.O. Box 6100
Hauppauge, New York 11788-0099
(631) 853-4049
BY: Christopher A. Jeffreys
Assistant County Attorney
TO: SEE ANNEXED RIDER
19
19 of 45
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2017 10:43 AM INDEX NO. 611214/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
ALICIA M. ARUNDEL; SUZANNE DEMAND FOR
SCHULMAN, as Administratrix of the Estate ECONOMIC EXPERTS
of BRITTNEY M. SCHULMAN, deceased;
OLGA LIPETS; MINDY GRABINA, as
Administratrix of the Estate of AMY
GRABINA, and MINDY GRABINA,
Individually; STEVEN BARUCH, as
Administrator of the Estate of LAUREN
BARUCH, deceased and STEVEN BARUCH,
Individually; JOELLE DIMONTE; and
MELISSA A. CRAI,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
Index No. 600055/2016
ULTIMATE CLASS LIMOUSINE INC.,
CARLOS PINO, ROMEO DIMON MARINE
SERVICE, INC., STEVEN ROMEO, TOWN
OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,
CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC., d/b/a
ROYALE LIMOUSINE and "XYZ
COMPANIES 1-5" name being fictitious but
intended to be the remanufacturers,
distributors, and/or sellers of the 2007 Lincoln