23CV412119 Susana Hernandez vs Alissa Compromise of Minor's Claim. No Proof of Fernandez et al service on file for Petition for Approval of Compromise of Claim. The hearing of this Petition is continued to June 27, 2024 at 9 a.m. in Department 18 to allow Petitioner to file Proof of Service. Moving party to prepare the formal order after hearing. SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 18 Honorable Shella Deen, Presiding Farris Bryant, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 DATE: June 11, 2024 TIME: 9:00 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8.E Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS

20CV372951 Tonya Hunter vs County of Santa See Tentative Ruling. Court will prepare the final Motion: Summary Clara et al ruling. Judgment/Adjudication

18CV328915 Uzair v. Google, LLC On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to July 11, 2024, at 1:30 p.m.

20CV364549 Faramarz Kiani vs Tom Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs. Notice McNeil of hearing was given by Defendant on April 29, 2024. Motion is brought pursuant to Civil Code § 1717, following Defendant’s successful Motion for Summary Judgment. No opposition was filed. A failure to oppose a motion may be deemed a consent to the granting of the motion. CRC Rule 8.54c. Failure to oppose a motion leads to the presumption that Plaintiff has no meritorious arguments. (See Laguna Auto Body v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (1991) 231 Cal.App. 3d 481, 489.) Moving party meets his burden of proof. Good cause appearing, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant is the “prevailing party” for the purposes of an award of attorney’s fees under Civil Code § 1717. The Court determines that the attorney’s fees are reasonable (PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal. 4th 1084, Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal. 4th 1122). Defendant is awarded $131, 490.00 attorney’s fees and $935 in costs (per Memorandum of Costs filed March 14, 2024.) Moving party to prepare the formal order after hearing. SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 18 Honorable Shella Deen, Presiding Farris Bryant, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 DATE: June 11, 2024 TIME: 9:00 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8.E Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS

23CV428312 Dennis Kyne, Jr. vs Dennis Kyne, Notice appearing proper and good cause appearing, Motion: Strike Sr. the unopposed motion to strike is GRANTED. The failure to file a written opposition “‘creates an inference that the motion or demurrer is meritorious.’” Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.

23CV422098 Hansen Law Firm, P.C. vs Off calendar. Carleen Whittelsey

18CV328915 Uzair v. Google, LLC On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to July 11, 2024, at 1:30 p.m.

23CV428385 Soulbrain CA, LLC et al vs Demurrer. First Amended Complaint filed on Seung Pyo (Dominic) Lee et al May 29, 2024, rendering the demurrer MOOT. SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 18 Honorable Shella Deen, Presiding Farris Bryant, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 DATE: June 11, 2024 TIME: 9:00 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8.E Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS