Preview
86-CV-24-3514
Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
7/2/2024 3:24 PM
CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF WRIGHT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Citibank, N.A.
Plaintiff,
vs.
SUMMONS
Adam Blomquist
Court File No.
Defendant s).
THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S):
I. You are being sued. The Plaintiff has started a lawsuit against you. The Complaint is
attached to this Summons. Do not throw these papers away. They are official papers that sta11 a lawsuit and
affect your legal rights, even if nothing has been filed with the cou11 and even if there is no cou11 file
number on this Summons.
2. You must BOTH reply, in writing, AND get a copy of your reply to the
person/business who is suing you within 21 days to protect your rights. Your reply is called an
Answer. Getting your reply to the Plaintiff is called service. You must serve a copy of your Answer or
Answer and Counterclaim (Answer) within 21 days from the date you received the Summons and
Complaint.
ANSWER: You can find the Answer form and instructions on the MN Judicial Branch website at
www.mncou11s.gov/forms under the "Civil" category. The instructions will explain in detail how to fill out
the Answer form.
3. You must respond to each claim. The Answer is your written response to the Plaintiff's
Complaint. In your Answer you must state whether you agree or disagree with each paragraph of the
Complaint. 1f you think the Plaintiff should not be given everything asked for in the Complaint, you must
say that in your Answer.
4. SERVICE: You may lose your case if you do not send a written response to the
Plaintiff. If you do not serve a written Answer within 21 days, you may lose this case by default. You will
not get to tell your side of the story. If you choose not to respond, the Plaintiff may be awarded everything
they asked for in the Complaint. If you agree with the claims stated in the Complaint, you don't need to
respond. A Default Judgment can then be entered against you for what the Plaintiff asked for in the
Complaint.
To protect your rights, you must serve a copy of your Answer on the person who signed this
Summons in person or by mail at this address: Messerli & Kramer P.A., 3033 Campus Drive, Suite 250,
Plymouth, MN 55441.
:5. Carefully read the Instructions (ClV301) for the Answer for your next steps.
MNOI0I I ilc No 2-1·110128
1
86-CV-24-3514
Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
7/2/2024 3:24 PM
6. Legal Assistance. You may wish to get legal help from an attorney. If you do not have an
attorney, and would like legal help:
• Visit www.mncomis.gov/selfhelp and click on the "Legal Advice Clinics" tab to get more
information about legal clinics in each Minnesota County.
• Comi Administration may have information about places where you can get legal
assistance.
NOTE: Even if you cannot get legal help, you must still serve a written Answer to protect your rights
or you may lose the case.
7. Alternative Dispute Resolution. The pa1iies may agree to or be ordered to participate in
an ADR process under Rule 114 of the Minnesota Rules of Practice. You must still serve your written
Answer, even if you expect to use ADR.
MESSERLI & KRAMER PA
iil'ian N. 'Naikrr
I! 0188i7'.i - MN
/
/
DATE:
eSigned on 3/12/2024 in Hennepin County, MN
3033 Campus Drive, Ste. 250
Plymouth, MN 55441
cc-litigation@messerlikramer.com
Ph#: (763) 548-7900
Fax#: (763)548-7922
This communication is from a debt collector and is an attempt to collect a debt. Any information
obtained will be used for that purpose.
MNOIOI File No 2-l-l lOl2R
2
Related Content
in Wright County
Ruling
CITIBANK, N.A. vs CERVANTES
Jul 27, 2024 |
Frank Anthony Moschetti |
CVCO2300845
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
CVCO2300845 CITIBANK VS CERVANTES
FOR ROMAN G CERVANTES
Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling will be issued.
Ruling
Synchrony Bank vs Dianna Rodriguez
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CV-03604
23CV-03604 Synchrony Bank v. Dianna Rodriguez
Motion for Order that Requests for Admission be deemed admitted
Appearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of the
court at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.
Ruling
Captial One, N.A. vs. Ward
Jul 28, 2024 |
23CVG-01215
CAPITAL ONE, N.A. VS. WARD
Case Number: 23CVG-01215
Tentative Ruling on Motion for Order that Matters in Request for Admission of Truth of Facts be
Admitted: Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. seeks an order deeming the truth of matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request
for Admissions, Set One. Despite being timely served, Defendant Leah Ward did not file an Opposition.
When a party fails to respond to a request for admission, the requesting party may move for an order deeming the
genuineness of documents and the truth of matters specified in the requests admitted. CCP § 2033.280(b). Failure
to respond also waives any objections to the discovery propounded. CCP § 2033.280(a). Plaintiff’s moving papers
sufficiently demonstrate that Defendant has failed to respond to the Request for Admissions within the required
time frame.
Unlike a motion to compel further responses, a motion to compel responses when no responses have been
provided does not require the propounding party to demonstrate good cause or that it satisfied a meet-and-confer
requirement. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal. App. 4th
390. Despite there being no requirement to meet and confer, Plaintiff sent a meet and confer letter to Defendant,
through her former counsel, prior to filing the motion.
Monetary sanctions are mandatory per CCP 2033.280(c), however, Plaintiff did not seek monetary sanctions and
provided no evidence regarding attorney’s fees or other costs associated with bringing the motion. Sanctions
should only be imposed for “reasonable” expenses. CCP § 2023.030. The Court does not have information upon
which to make a finding that any amount of sanctions were for reasonable expenses and should not impose
sanctions.
The motion is GRANTED. Defendant is deemed to have admitted as true each of the items contained in
Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Set One. Objections are waived. Plaintiff provided a proposed Order that
will be executed by the Court. The Court confirms the trial date of January 21, 2025.
Ruling
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. vs. JAY SORENSEN
Jul 24, 2024 |
24CV13522
No appearances necessary. This is a collections case, as defined in Rule 3.740 of the California Rules of Court, filed January 12, 2024. A proof of service is filed. Plaintiff must obtain default judgment within 360 days of filing the complaint. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.740(f).) This matter is continued for further CMC to November 6, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept 3.
Ruling
Capital One, N.a. vs Yates
Jul 26, 2024 |
23CV46838
23CV46838
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ACKNOWLEDGE TITLE 48 CFR
AFFIDAVIT PRESENTED AS LETTER OF ROGATORY
On July 24, 2023, Capital One, N.A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint for common counts or
account stated against Deanna K. Yates (“Defendant.”) Defendant filed a response on
December 4, 2023.
Defendant now moves “to Acknowledge Title 48 CFR International Commercial Affidavit
Presented as Letter of Rogatory.” Plaintiff opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth
below, the Motion is denied.
The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3.3.7. All matters noticed for the Law &
Motion calendar shall Include the following language in the notice:
3.3.7 Tentative Rulings (Effective 1/1/18) All parties appearing on the Law
and Motion calendar shall utilize the tentative ruling system. Tentative
Rulings are available by 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the
scheduled hearing and can be accessed either through the court's website
or by telephoning 209-754-6285. The tentative ruling shall become the
ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the
Court no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing
including advising that all other sides have been notified of the intention to
appear by calling 209-754-6285. Where appearance has been requested
or invited by the Court, all argument and evidence Is limited pursuant to
Local Rule 3 3. All matters noticed for the Law & Motion calendar shall
Include the following language in the notice:
Pursuant to Local Rule 3 3 7, the Court will make a tentative ruling on the
merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. The
complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's
website or by calling 209-754-6285 and listening to the recorded tentative
ruling. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the
court day preceding the hearing, no hearing wiII be held and the tentative
ruling shall become the ruling of the court [emphasis in original.]
Failure to include this language in the notice may be a basis for the Court to
deny the motion.
While the Court has authority to deny the motion on this ground alone, in the interests of
justice it has considered the substantive merits of the Defendant’s motion and denies
the motion on that basis.
Legal Analysis
Defendant appears to be arguing that Plaintiff’s complaint is invalid on the grounds of
what is known as the Sovereign Citizen Movement. The Sovereign Citizen movement is
a “loose grouping of litigants, commentators, and tax protestors who often take the
position that they are not subject to state or federal statutes and proceedings.” (United
States v. Weast (5th Cir. 2016), 811 F.3d 743, 746 fn. 5.) In essence, subscribers to this
movement will show up in court “asserting various theories to the effect the court has no
jurisdiction over them.” (Ibid.)
Courts across all jurisdictions have consistently designated these types of arguments as
frivolous.(See e.g., United States v. Studley (9th Cir. 1986), 783 F.2d 934, 937, fn. 4 [the
sovereign citizen argument has been “consistently and thoroughly rejected by every
branch of the government for decades. Indeed advancement of such utterly meritless
arguments is now the basis for serious sanctions imposed on civil litigants who raise
them”]; (U.S. v. Benabe, (7th Cir. 2011, 54 F.3d 753, 767 [such theories that a
“sovereign citizen” is beyond the jurisdiction of the courts “should be rejected
summarily, however they are presented”]; Ceja v. Birkholz, CV 22-1636-FWS(E) (C.D.
Cal. May 3, 2022) [citing numerous cases finding sovereign citizen claims to be frivolous
and without merit].)
California courts may exercise jurisdiction “on any basis not inconsistent with the
Constitution of this state or of the United States.” (Code of Civil Procedure §410.10.)
This Court has personal jurisdiction because Defendant was properly served with the
Summons and Complaint at her residence of 4628 S. Burson Rd., Valley Springs, CA
95252. As regards subject matter jurisdiction this “relates to the inherent authority of the
court involved to deal with the case or matter before it.” (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v.
Delfino (2005), 35 Cal.4th 180, 186.) The Defendant has failed to make any valid
argument that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
Based on the foregoing, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
The Clerk shall provide notice of the Ruling forthwith. No further formal Order is
required.
GUARANTY HOLDINGS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v CATTANEO
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs CERVANTES
Jul 28, 2024 |
Frank Anthony Moschetti |
CVCO2300997
DISCOVER BANK VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
CVCO2300997
CERVANTES FOR CAROLINA CERVANTES
Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling will be issued.
Ruling
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
Aug 05, 2024 |
S-CV-0051944
S-CV-0051944 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
** NOTE: telephonic appearances are strongly encouraged
Appearance required. Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading,
default or dismissal as to Defendant(s): Tucker, Deram K
Additionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Tucker,
Deram K
Ruling
LVNV FUNDING LLC vs MCINTOSH
Jul 24, 2024 |
CVPS2202864
LVNV FUNDING LLC vs Motion to Enforce Settlement by LVNV
CVPS2202864
MCINTOSH FUNDING LLC
Tentative Ruling: Parties to appear.
Preview
86-CV-24-3514 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 7/2/2024 3:24 PM CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACT STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF WRIGHT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Citibank, N.A. Plaintiff, vs. SUMMONS Adam Blomquist Court File No. Defendant s). THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S): I. You are being sued. The Plaintiff has started a lawsuit against you. The Complaint is attached to this Summons. Do not throw these papers away. They are official papers that sta11 a lawsuit and affect your legal rights, even if nothing has been filed with the cou11 and even if there is no cou11 file number on this Summons. 2. You must BOTH reply, in writing, AND get a copy of your reply to the person/business who is suing you within 21 days to protect your rights. Your reply is called an Answer. Getting your reply to the Plaintiff is called service. You must serve a copy of your Answer or Answer and Counterclaim (Answer) within 21 days from the date you received the Summons and Complaint. ANSWER: You can find the Answer form and instructions on the MN Judicial Branch website at www.mncou11s.gov/forms under the "Civil" category. The instructions will explain in detail how to fill out the Answer form. 3. You must respond to each claim. The Answer is your written response to the Plaintiff's Complaint. In your Answer you must state whether you agree or disagree with each paragraph of the Complaint. 1f you think the Plaintiff should not be given everything asked for in the Complaint, you must say that in your Answer. 4. SERVICE: You may lose your case if you do not send a written response to the Plaintiff. If you do not serve a written Answer within 21 days, you may lose this case by default. You will not get to tell your side of the story. If you choose not to respond, the Plaintiff may be awarded everything they asked for in the Complaint. If you agree with the claims stated in the Complaint, you don't need to respond. A Default Judgment can then be entered against you for what the Plaintiff asked for in the Complaint. To protect your rights, you must serve a copy of your Answer on the person who signed this Summons in person or by mail at this address: Messerli & Kramer P.A., 3033 Campus Drive, Suite 250, Plymouth, MN 55441. :5. Carefully read the Instructions (ClV301) for the Answer for your next steps. MNOI0I I ilc No 2-1·110128 1 86-CV-24-3514 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 7/2/2024 3:24 PM 6. Legal Assistance. You may wish to get legal help from an attorney. If you do not have an attorney, and would like legal help: • Visit www.mncomis.gov/selfhelp and click on the "Legal Advice Clinics" tab to get more information about legal clinics in each Minnesota County. • Comi Administration may have information about places where you can get legal assistance. NOTE: Even if you cannot get legal help, you must still serve a written Answer to protect your rights or you may lose the case. 7. Alternative Dispute Resolution. The pa1iies may agree to or be ordered to participate in an ADR process under Rule 114 of the Minnesota Rules of Practice. You must still serve your written Answer, even if you expect to use ADR. MESSERLI & KRAMER PA iil'ian N. 'Naikrr I! 0188i7'.i - MN / / DATE: eSigned on 3/12/2024 in Hennepin County, MN 3033 Campus Drive, Ste. 250 Plymouth, MN 55441 cc-litigation@messerlikramer.com Ph#: (763) 548-7900 Fax#: (763)548-7922 This communication is from a debt collector and is an attempt to collect a debt. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose. MNOIOI File No 2-l-l lOl2R 2