Document for Ching Lee, et al vs. Adam Taylor Kerrel, et al

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                    COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

     ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
  AS THE ACTION IS “AT ISSUE” AND CASE IS ORDERED TO ADR                        FILED
  In the Matter of: Ching Lee, et al vs. Adam Taylor Kerrel, et            SAN MATEO COUNTY
                    al                                                             4/6/2023
                                                                           By /s/ Liliana Cervantes
  Case Number: 22-CIV-05292                                                   ADR Program Analyst


TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
        THE COURT FINDS as follows:
         An initial Case Management Conference was previously ordered and scheduled for 04/19/2023
in this action.
        Pursuant to Rule 3.722(d) of the California Rules of Court, based upon the Court’s review of
the filed Case Management Statement(s) and the docket of this action, the Court determines that
appearances at the Conference are not necessary at this time, as this action is “at issue”; and
determines that the Case Management Conference should be vacated as all parties have indicated in
their Case Management Statements that they are agreeable to participating in the ADR Process.
        In accordance with Local Rules 3.805 and 3.904(b), all parties referred to ADR must complete a
Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court. In
accordance with Local Rule 2.1.7, all parties, except for self-represented litigants, are required to file
the Stipulation and Order to ADR electronically.

        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
        1. The initial Case Management Conference is VACATED.
        2. No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, parties must complete and sign a
Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court, pursuant to
Local Rule 3.904(b).
        3. The ADR Process shall be completed no later than 90 days from the date of this Order.
        4. Pursuant to Local Rule 0.2, Local Rule 3.805(h), and CRC Rule 2.30, the Court is empowered
to impose monetary sanctions of a minimum of $150.00 upon any party or their counsel for failure to
follow the requirements of this Order, or of the California Rules of Court, or of the Code of Civil
Procedure. If you fail to follow the requirements of this Order, you will be subject to an order to show
cause as to why monetary sanctions of $150.00, or some other amount, should not be imposed against
you.
        5. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve this Order on all parties not listed on the Court’s proof of service
within five (5) days of the date of this Order.

DATED: 4/6/2023                                                    Michael L. Mau
                                                    Honorable Michael L. Mau, CIVIL COMMISSIONER
                              SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
                              400 County Center, Redwood City, CA 94063
                                           (650) 261-5100
                                      www.sanmateocourt.org

                                         AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING

Date: 4/6/2023

In the Matter of: Ching Lee, et al vs. Adam Taylor Kerrel, et al
Case Number: 22-CIV-05292

        I declare under penalty of perjury that on the following date I deposited in the United States Post
Office mail box at Redwood City, a true copy of the attached document(s) order continuing case
management conference, enclosed in an envelope, with proper and necessary postage thereon, and
addressed to the following:

Executed on: 4/6/2023
                                               Neal I Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer/Clerk

                                          By: /s/ Liliana Cervantes
                                              Liliana Cervantes, ADR Program Analyst

Copies mailed to:


      TERESA LI                                         LAW OFFICES OF TERESA LI PC
                                                        548 MARKET STREET PMB 24496
                                                        SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104

      BRETT T. MORONEY                                  GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP
                                                        275 BATTERY STREET
                                                        SUITE 2000
                                                        SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111