On February 04, 2020 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Valdez, Joann,
and
Seiu Local 121Rn. As A California Organization,
for Wrongful Termination Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Michael J. Jaurigue (SBN 208123) S.Sean Sahabi (SBN 204710) Nicole Clancy (SBN 305341)
TELEPHONE N0; 313.530.7230 FAX N0; 888-37946“
EMAIL ADDRESS:
service@j|glawyers.com, michael@jlg|awyers.com, sean@jlg|awyers.com,nicole@jlglawyers‘com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Joann Vldez
F l L E
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA
D
COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO: SAN BERNARmNo DISTRICT
247 West Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0210 APR 2 2 2024
Civil Division
PLAINTIFF(S)/PETITIONER(5)
BY 0,
g5“
JES
Joann Vaidez ICAGA ‘Ezgepuw
DEFENDANT(S)/RESPONDENT(S) JUDGE
SEIU 12 lRN Stephanie Tanada
IN THE MATTER OF DEPT
Valdez v. SEIU 121 RN SBS-SBJC
CASE NUMBER:
PEREMPTO RY CHALLENGE cnvoszooms
Michael J. Jaurigue ,is B a party Q an attorney for a party in the above-entitled case and
declares that Stephanie Tanada the judicial officer to whom
, case this is
assigned, prejudiced against the party or the party’s attorney or interests of the party or the party’s attorney such that
is
the said party or parties believe(s) that a fair and impartial trial or hearing cannot be had before this judicial officer.
WHEREFORE, pursuant to the provision of the Code of Civ. Proc. §170.6, | respectfully request that this court issue its
order reassigning said case to another judicial officer for further proceedings.
Ideclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
.
Date; 4/17/2024 7 z.
2 (Q
U
fl Signature
The CourtfindsthattheAmdavit'wasnot( (Q )filedtimely.
Judicial Officer's initials
ORDER
WGRANTED — The Court finds the challenge is filed timely and the party’s/attorney’s above statement meets the
requirements of Code of Civ. Proc. §170.6(a)(4).
C DENIED -
IT IS SO ORDERED.
-
v
22—13
Date:
{6&0/ [/1], 7flZ7
s
“wmmwafi‘nz
Date:
(m1 254912 Caseisreassignedt J COICCL MGI’3ah
Form no: 13-22002-360 Optional PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE REV. DATE 01/27/22
PROOF OFSERVICE
Case No.: CIVDSZOO3745
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles; I am over the age of eighteen
years and am not a
party to the within action; and my business address is 300 W. Glenoaks Boulevard, Suite 300,
Glendale, California 91202.
On April 17, 2024, I served true copies of these documents to the addressee(s) indicated below:
PLAINTIFF’S PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE
on the party (or parties) in their action by delivering a true copy (or copies) addressed as follows:
Attorney/E—Service List Recipientsfor Defendamfor SEIU
William D. Naeve (SBN 92270)
Dawn Spurrier
lO
Kerie Goldsmith
MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP
ll
18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 950
Irvine, California92612-1077
12
Telephone: (714) 972-9977
Facsimile: (714) 972-1404
l3
wnaeve@murchisonlaw.com
dspurrier@murchisonlaw.com
l4
kgoldsmith@murchisonlaw.com
15
l6
XXX BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I caused to be served by electronic transmission (e-mail) to
the parties and/or their attorneys of record stated above. The document(s) was/were transmitted by
l7
electronic transmission. The transmission was reported as complete and without error.
18
l9
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true
and correct and was executed on April 17, 2024, at Glendale, California.
20
21
22
23
?¢ Parker Swanson
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
PROOF OF SERVICE
Document Filed Date
April 22, 2024
Case Filing Date
February 04, 2020
Category
Wrongful Termination Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.