arrow left
arrow right
  • JOANN VALDEZ -v- SEIU LOCAL 121RN. AS A CALIFORNIA ORGANIZATION Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • JOANN VALDEZ -v- SEIU LOCAL 121RN. AS A CALIFORNIA ORGANIZATION Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • JOANN VALDEZ -v- SEIU LOCAL 121RN. AS A CALIFORNIA ORGANIZATION Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • JOANN VALDEZ -v- SEIU LOCAL 121RN. AS A CALIFORNIA ORGANIZATION Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Michael J. Jaurigue (SBN 208123) S.Sean Sahabi (SBN 204710) Nicole Clancy (SBN 305341) TELEPHONE N0; 313.530.7230 FAX N0; 888-37946“ EMAIL ADDRESS: service@j|glawyers.com, michael@jlg|awyers.com, sean@jlg|awyers.com,nicole@jlglawyers‘com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Joann Vldez F l L E SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA D COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO: SAN BERNARmNo DISTRICT 247 West Third Street San Bernardino, CA 92415-0210 APR 2 2 2024 Civil Division PLAINTIFF(S)/PETITIONER(5) BY 0, g5“ JES Joann Vaidez ICAGA ‘Ezgepuw DEFENDANT(S)/RESPONDENT(S) JUDGE SEIU 12 lRN Stephanie Tanada IN THE MATTER OF DEPT Valdez v. SEIU 121 RN SBS-SBJC CASE NUMBER: PEREMPTO RY CHALLENGE cnvoszooms Michael J. Jaurigue ,is B a party Q an attorney for a party in the above-entitled case and declares that Stephanie Tanada the judicial officer to whom , case this is assigned, prejudiced against the party or the party’s attorney or interests of the party or the party’s attorney such that is the said party or parties believe(s) that a fair and impartial trial or hearing cannot be had before this judicial officer. WHEREFORE, pursuant to the provision of the Code of Civ. Proc. §170.6, | respectfully request that this court issue its order reassigning said case to another judicial officer for further proceedings. Ideclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. . Date; 4/17/2024 7 z. 2 (Q U fl Signature The CourtfindsthattheAmdavit'wasnot( (Q )filedtimely. Judicial Officer's initials ORDER WGRANTED — The Court finds the challenge is filed timely and the party’s/attorney’s above statement meets the requirements of Code of Civ. Proc. §170.6(a)(4). C DENIED - IT IS SO ORDERED. - v 22—13 Date: {6&0/ [/1], 7flZ7 s “wmmwafi‘nz Date: (m1 254912 Caseisreassignedt J COICCL MGI’3ah Form no: 13-22002-360 Optional PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE REV. DATE 01/27/22 PROOF OFSERVICE Case No.: CIVDSZOO3745 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles; I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the within action; and my business address is 300 W. Glenoaks Boulevard, Suite 300, Glendale, California 91202. On April 17, 2024, I served true copies of these documents to the addressee(s) indicated below: PLAINTIFF’S PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE on the party (or parties) in their action by delivering a true copy (or copies) addressed as follows: Attorney/E—Service List Recipientsfor Defendamfor SEIU William D. Naeve (SBN 92270) Dawn Spurrier lO Kerie Goldsmith MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP ll 18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 950 Irvine, California92612-1077 12 Telephone: (714) 972-9977 Facsimile: (714) 972-1404 l3 wnaeve@murchisonlaw.com dspurrier@murchisonlaw.com l4 kgoldsmith@murchisonlaw.com 15 l6 XXX BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I caused to be served by electronic transmission (e-mail) to the parties and/or their attorneys of record stated above. The document(s) was/were transmitted by l7 electronic transmission. The transmission was reported as complete and without error. 18 l9 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed on April 17, 2024, at Glendale, California. 20 21 22 23 ?¢ Parker Swanson 24 25 26 27 28 -1- PROOF OF SERVICE