arrow left
arrow right
  • CUNHA -v- CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • CUNHA -v- CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • CUNHA -v- CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • CUNHA -v- CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 1 ANDRADE GONZALEZLLP SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY H. GONZALEZ ISBN 208419] COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2 gonzalez@ andradefi rm. com SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT h ArDE C. ONTTVEROS ISBN 1696291 2/27/2024 8:41 PM J aontiveros@andradefi rm. com By: Betty Davidson, DEPUTY 4 BLANCA P. CHAVEZ ISBN 3399191 bchavez@andradefi rm. com 5 801 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1050 Los Angeles, Californi a 90017 6 Telephone: (213) 986-3950 Facsimile: (213) 995-9696 7 8 Attorneys for PLAINTIFF ARTHUR J. CTINHA 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO 12 ARTHUR JOSEPH CUNHA, an individual, Case No.: CMS202II32 13 fAssigned to Hon. Thomas S. Garza, Plaintiff, Dept. S27l t4 VS NOTICE OF RULING RE: PLAINTIFF'S 15 MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT'S CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM I6 DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 50, INTERROGATORIES (SET FOUR) AND FOR SANCTIONS Inclusive, T7 Defendants Hearing 18 Date: February 27,2024 l9 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: S27 20 2t Date Action Filed: September 30,2020 Trial Date: Vacated 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF RULING I TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 PLBASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Arthur Joseph Cunha's Motion to Compel a J Defendant's Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set Four) and For Sanctions came on 4 regularly for hearing on February 21,2024, at 8:30 a.m., in Department S27 before the Hon. 5 Thomas S. Garza of the San Bernardino Superior Court. Plaintiff was represented by Blanca P. 6 Chavez of Andrade Gonzalezl,I-P. Defendant was represented by Amy A. Evenstad of 7 McCune & Harber, LLP. 8 The Court ordered as follows: 9 1. Plaintiff s Motion to Compel Defendant's Further Responses to Form Interrogatories 10 (Set Four) is denied. O 'I o o -F6 l1 2. Both parties' requests for sanctions are denied. N=< ta7,a )iA