arrow left
arrow right
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • In The Matter Of The Arbitration Attempted To Be Had Between Old Republic Insurance Company v. Wei LiTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS ---------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Arbitration Attempted to be had Between OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITION TO TEMPORARILY STAY Petitioner, ARBITRATION -against- WEI LI, Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------- X MICHAEL HEMWAY, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New York, affirms the following to be true, upon information and belief, under the penalties for perjury: 1. I am associated with the law firm of GARTNER + BLOOM, P.C., attorneys for Petitioner, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY (hereinafter referred to as “Petitioner” or “ORIC”), in the above-captioned matter. As such, I am familiar with the facts of this case based upon the contents of the file maintained by this office. 2. This Petition is submitted in support of ORIC’s application seeking an Order: a. Temporarily Staying the Arbitration on April 16, 2024, the issuance of any award and the enforcement of any such award flowing therefrom, due, in part, to the recent filing of a RICO lawsuit against Respondent’s treating medical provider; and b. Pursuant to CPLR § 3102(c), compelling LI to (i) appear for an Examination Under Oath; and (ii) appear for an Independent Medical Examination(s); and c. For such other, further, and different relief as this Court deems just and proper. NATURE OF THE ACTION 3. This matter arises out of an alleged motor-vehicle accident that occurred on September 20, 2020 (“Accident”). LI claims underinsured motorist benefits for personal injuries 1 1 of 8 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 he alleges to have sustained in the Accident, under an insurance policy that ORIC issued to Uber USA, LLC, number MWTB 313795 20, which was in full force and effect on September 20, 2020, (“Policy”). A copy of the relevant portions of the ORIC Policy are annexed hereto as Exhibit “A”. 4. Pursuant to said Policy, ORIC agreed to pay certain sums for injury sustained by the Policy’s insured or a passenger in a covered vehicle on the date of loss, caused by an accident arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of an uninsured automobile. ORIC provides UM/SUM coverage of $250,000. See Exhibit A. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 5. Respondent’s treating medical provider, Dr. Andrew Merola, was named as a defendant in a RICO lawsuit that was brought in Eastern District of New York. Based on the allegations set forth in the Complaint of the RICO lawsuit, Respondent must be directed to appear for an examination under oath (“EUO”) and independent medical examinations (“IME”) so Petitioner can properly evaluate Respondent’s claims in light of the new allegations, and the pattern of behavior alleged in the RICO lawsuit. Additionally, appearing for an EUO and IME are expressly set forth in the ORIC policy. Respondent’s failure to appear for an EUO and IME warrants a temporary stay of these proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 6. The alleged incident occurred on September 20, 2020, on 907D westbound Belt Parkway at its intersection with 130th Street in Queens County, New York. A copy of the Police Accident Report is annexed hereto as “Exhibit B”. 7. On February 10, 2023, ORIC served their combined discovery demands on Respondent, which included a Demand for a Verified Bill of Particulars, Notice for Discovery and 2 2 of 8 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 Inspection, Notice for EUO, Notice for Physical Examination, and Demand for Prior Pleadings and Discovery. A copy of Petitioner’s Combined Demands is annexed hereto as Exhibit “C”. 8. On March 1, 2024, Respondent’s treating physician, Dr. Andrew Merola, was named as a defendant in a RICO lawsuit. A copy of the aforementioned Complaint, filed on March 1, 2024, is annexed hereto as Exhibit “D”.1 The allegations as to Dr. Merola include “knowingly profited by furthering the fraudulent treatment protocol by falsely submitting evaluations that opined claimants were disabled when they were not, and by performing unnecessary procedures.” Id. 9. Upon learning of the RICO lawsuit, Petitioner requested an adjournment of the arbitration. A conference was held with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) arbitrator on April 4, 2024, where Petitioner’s request for an adjournment was denied. 10. The arbitration hearing with the AAA is scheduled for April 16, 2024, warranting an immediate stay of the arbitration and the issuance of a decision so the necessary discovery can take place pursuant to the Policy. ARGUMENT 11. On March 1, 2024, Respondent’s treating medical provider, Dr. Andrew Merola, was named as a defendant in a RICO lawsuit which included numerous medical providers and carriers. See, Exhibit D. The filing of the RICO lawsuit prompted a re-evaluation of Respondent’s claims regarding his alleged treatment and whether it fits into an alleged pattern of events that is typical for the defendants in the RICO lawsuit. 12. Similarly, it is Petitioner’s position that the pending fraud lawsuit against Respondent’s treating medical provider should be resolved before this arbitration occurs as part of 1 Dr. Merola was alleged to have committed Common Law Fraud, Aiding and Abetting Fraud, RICO Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), and other severe criminal acts listed in the attached Complaint. See Exhibit “D”. 3 3 of 8 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 Petitioner’s potential defense at arbitration is that the Respondent’s injuries and subsequent surgery were not medically necessary and whether same was potentially fraudulent. 13. To be sure, as alleged in the RICO lawsuit, Dr. Merola “knowingly profited by furthering the fraudulent treatment protocol by falsely submitting evaluations that opined claimants were disabled when they were not, and by performing unnecessary procedures.” See, Exhibit D. Furthermore, as part of Dr. Merola’s treatment of the Respondent, a narrative report was submitted, which is annexed hereto as Exhibit “E”. Per the narrative report, Dr. Merola opined that “[w]ithin a reasonable degree of medical certainty the accident occurring on September 20, 2020, is the competent cause of injuries sustained to Mr. Wei Li’s low back and neck requiring surgical intervention to the lumbar spine. Mr. Li’s injuries are permanent in nature.” Id. 14. In order for Petitioner to determine whether Dr. Merola’s treatment of Respondent fits into a pattern of behavior that is alleged in the RICO lawsuit, an EUO and IME are necessary. Without an EUO and IME, Petitioner will not be able to determine whether the surgery performed by Dr. Merola was medically necessary or whether it was part of a pattern of behavior alleged in the RICO lawsuit. 15. While Petitioner is entitled to an EUO and IME based on the reasons set forth above, ORIC’s statutory right to direct LI to appear for an EUO and IME is beyond dispute. 16. Pursuant to the “Conditions” of Section 60-2.3 of Title 11 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations, “Requirements for sum endorsements,” every motor vehicle liability insurance policy shall state that the insured shall submit to examination(s) under oath and independent medical examination(s), as required by the insurer. Specifically, Section 60-2.3 requires that the UM/SUM endorsement state the following: 4 4 of 8 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 2. Notice and Proof of Claim: As soon as practicable, the insured or other person making claim shall give us written notice of claim under this SUM coverage. (i) As soon as practicable after our written request, the insured or other person making claim shall give us written proof of claim, under oath if required, including full particulars of the nature and extent of the injuries, treatment, and other details we need to determine the SUM amount payable. (ii) The insured and every other person making claim hereunder shall, as may reasonably be required, submit to examinations under oath by any person we name and subscribe the same. Proof of claim shall be made upon forms we furnish unless we fail to furnish such forms within 15 calendar days after receiving notice of claim. 3. Medical Reports: The insured shall submit to physical examinations by physicians we select when and as often as we may reasonably require. The insured, or in the event of the insured's incapacity, the insured's legal representative (or in the event of the insured's death, the insured's legal representative or the person or persons entitled to sue therefor), shall upon each request from us authorize us to obtain copies of relevant medical reports and records. 11 NYCRR § 60-2.3 (emphasis added). 17. Similarly, ORIC’s Policy contains the requisite language required by Section 60-2 and provides that, upon request by ORIC, any person making a claim for underinsured benefits under the Policy must submit for an EUO and IME. Specifically, the Policy states: 3. Notice and Proof of Claim. Within 90 days or as soon as practicable, the insured or other person making claim shall give us written notice of claim under this UM endorsement. As soon as practicable after our written request, the insured or other person making any claim shall give us written proof of claim, under oath if required, including full particulars of the nature and extent of the injuries, treatment, and other details we need to determine the UM amount payable hereunder. The insured and every other person making claim hereunder shall, as may reasonably be required, submit 5 5 of 8 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 to examinations under oath by any person named by us and subscribe the same. Proof of claim shall be made upon forms we furnish unless we fail to furnish such forms within 15 days after receiving notice of claim. (emph. added) 4. Medical Reports. The injured person shall submit to physical examinations by physicians we select when and as often as we may reasonably require. The insured, or in the event of the insured’s incapacity, such insured’s legal representative, or in the event of the insured’s death, the insured’s legal representative or the person or persons entitled to sue therefor, shall upon our request authorize us, when and as often as we may reasonably require, to obtain relevant medical reports and copies of records. (emph. added) 18. Respondent’s refusal to appear for an EUO and IME is in direct contravention of New York State Law and the Conditions of ORIC’s policy. 19. As is clearly demonstrated, Petitioner is entitled to conduct an EUO and IME of Respondent for the reasons stated supra. Additionally, it is now incumbent on Petitioner to investigate whether the treatment herein comports with the allegations made in the RICO lawsuit and the alleged pattern of behavior. 20. Additionally, as part of Respondent’s arbitration statement (exchanged on April 3, 2024), Respondent exchanged a dash-camera video of the incident. This was the first time that the Petitioner became aware that there was a video of the incident. Petitioner was blindsided with this information and was not able to retain an expert and have said expert opine on the video and how the mechanics of the incident impact Respondent’s alleged injuries. 21. Based upon the foregoing, ORIC respectfully submits that the arbitration scheduled for April 16, 2024, be temporarily stayed along with the issuance of a decision based on the filing 6 6 of 8 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 of the RICO lawsuit as to Respondent’s treating physician and direct Respondent to appear for an Examination Under Oath and an Independent Medical Examination(s). WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that an Order be made and entered granting the Petition to Temporarily Stay the Arbitration, and for such other and further relief that this Court may deem just and proper. Dated: April 12, 2024 New York, New York GARTNER + BLOOM, P.C. ______________________________ MICHAEL J. HEMWAY Attorneys for Petitioner OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY 801 Second Avenue, 11th Floor New York, New York 10017 (212) 759-5800 To: Kelsey Crowley, Esq. CAESAR AND NAPOLI, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent WEI LI 233 Broadway, Suite 2348 New York, New York 10279 (212) 226-3224 American Arbitration Association 32 Old Slip, 33rd Floor New York, New York 10005 7 7 of 8 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/12/2024 11:39 AM INDEX NO. 707865/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2024 ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION I, MICHAEL J. HEMWAY, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the courts of the State of New York, hereby certify that the attached document complies with the word count limit set forth in Uniform Rule 202.8-b as it contains 1,809 words, excluding the caption, table of contents, table of authorities, and signature block. In preparing this certification, I have relied on the word count of the word-processing system used to prepare the attached document. DATED: April 12, 2024 New York, New York __________________________________ MICHAEL J. HEMWAY, ESQ. 8 8 of 8