Preview
Filing # 135603522 E-Filed 09/29/2021 04:39:48 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINTII JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR OSCEOLA COUNLY, FLORIDA
CASE NO: 2020-CA-002942
VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA'LION, INC., a
Torida not for profit corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ROYAL OAK TOMMS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company; ADVANCED
WRAPPING. AND CONCRETE,
SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA,
INC., a Florida corporation; DON KING'S
CONCRETE, INC., a Morida corporation;
HUGH MACDONALD CONSTRUCTION,
INC., a Florida corporation, IMPERIAL
BUILDING CORPORATION, a Florida
corporation, PREMIER PLASTERING OF
CEN'IRAL FLORIDA, INC. N/K/A ‘1GK
STUCCO, INC., a Florida corporation,
WLATHERMASTER BUILDING
PRODUCIS, INC.., a Morida corporation;
WEIN LRAUB INSPECLIONS &
FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A WLEINTRAUB
ENGINEERING AND INSPL-CIIONS,
INC., a Tlorida corporation; ‘IHL DIMILLO
GROUP, LLC, a Florida limited liability
compat; WOLTI'S IRRIGATIONS &
LANDSCAPING HIOMES, INC., a Florida
corporation; BROWN + COMPANY
ARCHIIECIURE, INC., a TMorida
corpotation,
Defendants.
ROYAL OAK TOMMS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company,
Crossclaim Plaintiff.
vs.
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
‘Lhird-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion for Protective Order
Page 1 of 7
ADVANCED WRAPPING AND
CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC., a Tlorida corporation;
DON KING'S CONCRELE INC., a Morida
corporation; HUGH MACDONALD
CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida
corporation; IMPERIAL BUILDING
CORPORATION, a Florida corporation;
PREMIER PLASTERING OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC. N/K/A ‘TGK STUCCO,
INC., a Torida corporation;
WLATHERMASTER BUILDING
PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida corporation;
WLINTRAUB INSPECTIONS &
FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A WEIN RAUB
ENGINEERING AND INSPECLIONS,
INC,, a Florida corporation; WOLT'S
IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPING, INC., a
Florida corporation, BROWN + COMPANY
ARCHTIECIURE, INC, a Torida
corporation,
Crossclaim Defendants,
DON KING'S CONCRETT. INC., a Florida
corporation.
‘Vhird-Party Plaintiff.
v.
E.R.O. CONSIRUCLION, INC, a Florida
corporation; LIOS CONCRETT. CORP., a
Florida corporation; and ATLANTIC
CONCRETE SYSIEMS INC., a Florida
corporation.
‘Third-Party Defendants.
THIRD-PARTY DEF Li RETE RP’
MOTI FOR PROTE RDER
COMES NOW, ‘thitd-Patty Defendant, LIOS CONCREIT. CORP (“LIOS”), by and
through its undersigned counsel, hereby moves this Court to enter an Order granting this Motion
for Protective Order pursuant to I'lorida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) to protect LIOS from
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
‘Lhird-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion for Protective Order
Page 2 of 7
being required to participate in unnecessary discovery, and in support states the following:
1 Counsel for LIOS filed and served a Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings on
August 27, 2021. ‘The basis of its Motion to Dismiss is that the Master Subcontractor
Agteement between Don King’s Conctete, Inc. ((DKC”) and LIOS tequired that any
dispute would be filed in Seminole County, Ilorida, not Osceola County. See LIOS
Motion to Dismiss attached as [xhibit “A.” ‘The Motion is set for heating on
November 1, 2021.
Subsequently, Counsel for DKC filed and served T'irst Set of Interrogatories and First
Request for Production of Document to LIOS on September 9, 2021; with responses
due on October 9, 2021. See DKC’s interrogatories and RI'P attached as Composite
Exhibit “B.”
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(¢), provides that, “[u]pon motion by a patty ...
and for good cause shown, the court in which the action is pending may make any order
to protect a patty or petson from annoyance, embatrassment, oppression, or undue
burden or expense that justice requites, including one or more of the following: (1) that
the discovery not be had; (2) that the discovery may be had only on specified terms and
conditions, including a designative of time or place ... (4) that certain matters not be
inquited into, or that the scope of the discovery be limited to certain matters.”
Florida courts have imposed protective orders specifically addressing when discovery is
not to be had. In Tennant v Charton, the Court held that a protective ordet should be
issued for good cause shown, and to protect a party from annoyance, embarrassment,
oppression or undue burden ot expense that justice requites. 377 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1979).
Rojas v. Ryder 'Vruck Rental, Inc., established that a trial court possesses broad discretion in
overseeing discovery, and protecting the patties that come before it. 625 So, 2d 106, 107
(Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Additionally, Waite ». Wellington Boats, Inc., states that “trial courts
must be accorded broad discretion in the treatment of discovery problems through the
employment of the protective provisions contemplated by Rule 1.280.” 459 So.2d 425,
426 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Further, Ilorida courts have found that trial courts have discretion to stay discovery
pending the determination of a substantive motion that challenge the legal sufficiency of
a pleading. See Ieigin v. [lospital Staffing Services, Inc., 569 So.2d 941 (Ila. 4th DCA 1990)
(“the trial court did not abuse its discretion by .. staying appellant's discovery
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
‘Lhird-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion for Protective Order
Page 3 of 7
depositions pending the motion to dismiss hearing”); Deltona Corp. v. Bailey, 336 So.2d
1163 (Ila. 1976) (recognizing that “postponing discovery for a short period of time
pending determination of material, outstanding motions may be within the discretion of
the trial coutt...”); [lollywood, Inc. v. Broward County, 90 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1956) (trial court
had disctetion to enter an order staying depositions that “wete noticed while motions to
dismiss wete pending.”).
LIOS should not be required to comply with DKC’s discovery requests until after the
Court rules on its Motion to Dismiss. LIOS’s Motion to Dismiss challenges the legal
sufficiency of DKC’s third-party complaint. As set forth in LIOS’s Motion to Dismiss,
the parties entered into a Master Subcontract Agreement that requited the parties to
litigate this matter in Seminole County. DKC filed its third-party complaint in Osceola
County, in violation of the signed agreement.
lowing DKC to proceed with discovery prior to the court ruling on LIOS’s motion
will cause undue burden on LIOS by having to respond to discovery on a potentially
legally insufficient claim.
Accordingly, LIOS requests that this Court enter a protective order barring discovery, or
stay discovery until, a ruling on LIOS's Motion to Dismiss.
WHEREFORE, LIOS CONCRIIT, CORP, respectfully requests that this Ionotable
Coutt: (i) grant the instant Motion for Protective Order; (ii) enter an order pursuant to Mla. R. Civ. P.
1.280(c) stating that LIOS does not have to respond to any discovery until, if ever, after a ruling is
made on LIOS's Motion to Dismiss; (iii) otherwise stay any and all discovery against LIOS until a
tuling is made on LIOS's Motion to Dismiss, and; (iv) grant all further relief that is just and proper.
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
‘Lhird-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion for Protective Order
Page 4 of 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 29" day of September 2021, a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document has been filed via the I'lorida el'iling Portal, sent via [!-Mail to counsel and via
U.S. Mail for Pro Se patties as follows:
Phillip E. Joseph, Esq. Phillips. Howell, Tisq.
Evan J. Small, sq. Kyler. McNeal, sq.
Jeffrey A. Widelitz, Esq. Galloway, Johnson, ‘Tompkins, Burt & Smith,
Allana D.E. Smith, Esq. PLC.
Ball Janik LLP 400 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 1000
201 Last Pine Street, Suite 600 ‘Lampa, I'L 33602
Orlando, Florida 32801 (813) 977-1200 «
pjoseph@balljanik.com (813) 977-1288 - Facsimile
esmall@ballianik.com tampaservice@gallowayiawfirm.com
jwidelitz@pballjanik.com. phowell@gallowaylawfirm.com
asmith@pballianik.com kmenealr@gallmvaylawfirm.com
ypalmer@pballjanik.com Counsel for Casey Llawkins Glass, Inc.
cbetancourt@balljanik.com
bburton@balljanik.com
dmiksell@pballjanik.com
otlandodocket@balljanik.com
Counsel for Plainteffs
Lannie D. Hough Jr., Esq. Paul Sidney Lliott, Esq.
Robin Leavengood, L'sq. P.O. Box 274204
CARLTON FIELDS ‘Tampa, I'L 33688-4204
4221 W. Boy Scout Blvd, Suite 1000 pse@psejd.com
‘Lampa, l'lorida 33607 Counsel for [Iugh MacDonald Construction, Inc.
lhough@catltonfields.com
nbonilla@catltonfields.com.
leavengood@carltonfields.com
brosa@catltonfields.com
vwilliams@carltonfields.com
Counsel for Royal Oak Uomes, LIC
‘Limothy C. Tord, Esq. Denise M. Anderson, Esq.
Andrew I. Holway, Esq. Kate I’. Gaset, Esq.
TILL WARD HENDERSON BUTLER WEITIMULLER KATZ CRAIG LLP
101 L.. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 3700 400 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 2300
‘Yampa, l'lorida 33602 ‘Lampa, I'L 33602
tim. ford@hwhlaw.com danderson@butler.legal
andrew.holway@hwhlaw.com kgaset@butlet.legal
tracy.coale@hwhlaw.com ktieck@pbutler.legal
Kathy.wemsing@hwhlaw.com dwhite@butlerlegal
derrick.calandra@hwhlaw.com Counsel for Don King's Concrete, Inc.
Counsel for Weintraub Inspections & Forensic.
Inc.
‘Vhamir A.R. Kaddouti, Jr., Esq. Jayne Ann Pittman, Esq.
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
‘Lhird-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion for Protective Order
Page 5 of 7
Penelope T’. Rowlett, I'sq. CONROY SIMBERG
Beth Ann Tobey, Esq. ‘Two South Orange Avenue, Suite 300
LAW OTTICE OF THAMIR A. R. Orlando, I'L 32801
KADDOURL JR., P.A. eserviceorl@conroysimberg.com
3220 West Cypress Street jpittman@conroysimberg.com
‘Tampa, Florida 33607 mmaitland@conroysimberg.com
thamir.kaddouri@tampalaw.org Counsel for Advanced Wrapping and Concrete
service@tampalaw.org Solutions of Central Morida, Inc.
Counsel for Imperial Building Corporation
Bruce R. Caldeton, sq. Andrew ‘I’. Marshall, Lsq.
D. Bryan Hill, Esq. HAMILION, PRICE & MARSHALL, P.A
Audra R. Creech, Esq. 2400 Manatee Ave. W.
MILBER MAKRIS PLOUSADIS & Bradenton, FL 34205
SEIDEN, LLP Andrew@hamihonpricelaw.com
1900 NW Corporate Blvd. Nancy@hamiltonpricelaw.com
East lower, Suite 440 Kelsey@hamiltonpricelaw.com
Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Counsel for ‘T&M Construction of Sanford, Inc.
bealdeton@milbermaktis.com
dhill@milbermakris.com.
acreech@milbermakris.com
Counsel for Brown + Company Architectute,
Inc.
Nicole Seropian, Esq. Michael D. Ruel, Esq.
Jennifer Shippole, Isq. Brenden C. Collins, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF JENNIFER L. SHIPPOLE Galloway, Johnson, ‘Tompkins, Burt & Smith,
14050 NW 14th Street, Suite 180 P.L.C.
Sunrise, Morida 33323 400 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 1000
jlspleadings@fednat.com ‘Tampa, I'L 33602
nsetopian@fednat.com (813) 977-1200 + (813) 977-1288 — Facsimile
jshippole@fednat.com tampaservice@gallowaylawfirm.com
Counsel for Atlantic Concrete Systems, Inc. mrucl@gallowaylawfirm.com
bcollins@gallowaylawfirm.com
Counsel for Casey Hawkins Glass, Inc.
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
‘Lhird-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion for Protective Order
Page 6 of 7
Law Office of J. Chtistopher Norris
Joseph L. Zollner
Florida Bar No. 188506
PO Box 7217
London, KY 40742
‘Velephone: 904-346-5422
Facsimile: 866-270-1372
Counsel for Third-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp
Primary: I'loridaCDLegalMail@LibertyMutual.com
Secondary: joseph.zollner@libertymutual.com
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
‘Lhird-Party Defendant Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion for Protective Order
Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT ‘A’
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO: 2020-CA-002942
VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a
Florida not for profit corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company; ADVANCED
WRAPPING, AND CONCRETE
SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA,
INC., a Florida corporation; DON KING'S
CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation;
HUGH MACDONALD CONSTRUCTION,
INC, Florida corporation; IMPERIAL
a
BUILDING CORPORATION, a Florida
corporation, PREMIER PLASTERING OF
CENTRAL FLORIDA,
INC. N/K/A TGK
STUCCO, INC, a Florida corporation;
WEATHERMASTER BUILDING.
PRODUCTS, INC.., a Florida corporation;
WEINTRAUB INSPECTIONS &
FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A WEINTRAUB
ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS,
INC., a Florida corporation; THE DIMILLO
GROUP, LLC, a Florida limited liability
company; WOLF'S IRRIGATIONS &
LANDSCAPING HOMES, INC., a Florida
corporation; BROWN + COMPANY
ARCHITECTURE, INC, a Florida
corporation,
Defendants.
ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company,
Crossclaim Plaintiff.
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings
Page 1 of 7
vs.
ADVANCED WRAPPING AND
CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation; DON
KING'S CONCRETE INC, a Florida
corporation; HUGH MACDONALD
CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida
corporation; IMPERIAL BUILDING
CORPORATION, a Florida corporation;
PREMIER PLASTERING OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC. N/K/A TGK STUCCO,
INC, a Florida corporation;
WEATHERMASTER BUILDING.
PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida corporation;
WEINTRAUB INSPECTIONS &
FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A WEINTRAUB
ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS,
INC, a Florida corporation; WOLF'S
IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPING, INC., a
Florida corporation, BROWN + COMPANY
ARCHITECTURE, INC., a Florida
corporation,
Crossclaim Defendants,
DON KING'S CONCRETE INC., a Florida
corporation.
‘Third-Party Plaintiff.
v.
E.R.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida
corporation, LIOS CONCRETE CORP., a
Florida corporation; and ATLANTIC
CONCRETE SYSTEMS _ INC., a Florida
corporation.
Third-Party Defendants.
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings
Page 2 of 7
THIRD-PARTY, LIOS CONCRETE CORP.’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR STAY PROCEEDINGS
COMES NOW the Third-Party Defendant, LIOS CONCRETE CORP. (“LIOS”), by and
through its undersigned attorneys, and hereby moves this Honorable Court for the entry of an
Order dismissing or, in the alternative, staying proceedings against LIOS herein and, as grounds
therefore, states as follows:
1 Plaintiff filed the instant action on or about November 23, 2020, alleging
construction defects and deficiencies related to the design and construction of the Emerald Lakes
Condominium residential complex (“the Project”).
2. On or about December 29, 2020, Defendant, ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC filed a
Cross-Claim against DON KING’S CONCRETE, INC. (“DKC’) and others.
3 DKC filed a Third-Party Complaint (“the Third-Party Complaint”) on March 15,
2021, against LIOS as others. The claims against LIOS include Breach of Contract, Common Law
Indemnity, Violation of Building Code, Negligence, Contractual Indemnity, and Equitable
Subrogation.
4. DKC and LIOS entered into a Master Subcontractor Agreement dated December
23, 2015 (“the Contract”). A copy of the Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
5. The Contract states in Article 1 that it “...shall contain the terms, conditions and
specifications governing all construction projects that are or that may in the future be commenced
by and between DKC and [Lios]...”
6. The contract further states in Article 16, that “All disputes arising under this
Subcontractor or any bonds issued by either Contractor or its Surety or Subcontractor or its surety
(hereinafter “all disputes”) shall be mediated as a condition precedent to litigation or arbitration.”
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings
Page 3 of 7
DKC and LIOS signed the Contract and are, therefore, bound by its provisions.
7
DKC filed the Third-Party Complaint against LIOS prematurely, without first
fulfilling its obligations under the Contract. Specifically, DKC filed its Third-Party Complaint
without first mediating the dispute, which is a condition precedent to litigation under the
Contract between DKC and LIOS.
8 The Court recognized in Gefchell v. Suntrust Bank, 2016 WL 740603 (M.D. Fla. 2016)
that, “Since the parties entered into a valid and enforceable agreement to mediate disputes arising
out of the contract, Defendant has not waived its right to mediate, and no mediation has occurred,
this action is premature.”. Similarly, in 3-J Hospitality, LLC v Big Time Design, Inc., 2009 WL3586830,
(S.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2009), the Court found that the “...Plaintiff is bound to mediate the claims as a
condition precedent to litigation and the complaint must be dismissed.”
9 Article 16 of the Contract further states “If the dispute is litigated, it shall be resolved
solely and exclusively in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida in and for Seminole County,
Florida.”
10. DKC filed its Third-Party Complaint in Osceola County, Florida in violation of the
terms of Article 16 of the Contract, stating that the sole and exclusive venue for litigation between
DKC and Lios is the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida in and for Seminole County, Florida.
11. “Florida courts recognize a distinction between mandatory jurisdiction clauses in
contracts which require that a particular forum be the exclusive jurisdiction for litigation concerning
the contract, and permissive jurisdiction clauses which only provide that there may be jurisdiction
over such litigation in a particular forum.” Shoppes Ltd. Partnership v Conn, 829 So.2d 356 (Fla. 5”
DCA 2002). Article 16 of the Contract states that the sole and exclusive venue is Seminole
County, Florida. Given the exclusivity of the language, the clause is mandatory and DKC erred in
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings
Page 4 of 7
filing its Third-Party Complaint in Osceola County, Florida.
12. Likewise, in General Home Development Corp. v. Kwirant, 819 So.2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA.
2002), the Court held that “contractual requirement that “any” action brought by the purchaser or
builder “shall” be in particular county was susceptible to only one interpretation — that the parties
had expressed an intent to limit venue to one specific locale county specified therein.” Such is the
case herein, where the contract clause states that litigation between DKC and LIOS “shall be
resolved solely and exclusively” in Seminole County, Florida.
WHEREFORE, Third-Party Defendant, LIOS CONCRETE CORP., hereby moves this
Honorable Court for the entry of an Order dismissing the Third-Party Complaint for improper
venue and premature filing in light of the mediation provision or, in the alternative, staying
proceedings until such time as mediation can occur, and for all such further relief as this Court
deems just and proper.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 27th day of April, 2021, a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document has been filed via the Florida eFiling Portal, sent via E-Mail to counsel and via
US. Mail for Pro Se parties as follows:
Phillip E. Joseph, Esq. Phillips. Howell, Esq.
Evan J. Small, Esq. Kyler. McNeal, Esq.
Nicholas B. Vargo, Esq. Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith,
Allana D.E. Smith, Esq. P.L.C.
Ball Janik LLP 400 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 1000
201 East Pine Street, Suite 600 Tampa, FL 33602
Orlando, Florida 32801 (813) 977-1200 +
pjoseph@balljanik.com (813) 977-1288 - Facsimile
esmall@ballianik.com tampaservice@gallowayiawfirm.com
nvargo@balljanik.com phowell@gallowaylawfirm.com
asmith@ballianik.com kmcnealr@gallmvaylawfirm.com
vpalmcr@balljanik.com Counsel for Casey Hawkins Glass, Ine.
cbctancourt@ballianik.com
mwise@ballianik.com
dmiksell@ballianik.com
otlandodocket@balljanik.com
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings
Page 5 of 7
Counsel for Plaintiffs
Lannie D. Hough Jr., Esq. Paul Sidney Elliott, Esq.
Robin Leavengood, Esq. P.O. Box 274204
CARLTON FIELDS ‘Tampa, FL 33688-4204
4221 W. Boy Scout Blvd, Suite 1000 pse@psejd.com
Tampa, Florida 33607 Counsel for Hugh MacDonald Construction, Inc.
lhough@carltonfields.com
nbonilla@carltonfields.com
leavengood@carltonfields.com
brosa@carltonfields.com
vwilliams@carltonfields.com
Counsel for Rayal Oak Homes, LLC
Timothy C. Ford, Esq. Denise M. Anderson, Esq.
Andrew E. Holway, Esq. Kate F. Gaset, Esq.
HILL WARD HENDERSON BUTLER WEIHMULLER KATZ CRAIG LLP
101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 3700 400 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 2300
Tampa, Florida 33602 Tampa, FL 33602
tim.ford@hwhlaw.com danderson@butler.legal
andrew.holway@hwhlaw.com kgaset@butler.legal
tracy.coale@hwhlaw.com krieck@pbutlerlegal
Kathy.wemsing@hwhlaw.com dwhite@butler.legal
derrick.calandra@hwhlaw.com Counsel for Don King's Concrete, Inc.
Counsel for Weintraub Inspections & Forensic. Ine.
Thamir A.R. Kaddouti, Jr., Esq. Jayne Ann Pittman, Esq.
Penelope T. Rowlett, Esq. CONROY SIMBERG
Beth Ann Tobey, Esq. Two South Orange Avenue, Suite 300
LAW OFFICE OF THAMIR A. R. Orlando, FL 32801
KADDOURL JR., P.A. eserviceotl@conroysimberg.com
3220 West Cypress Street jpittman@conroysimberg.com
‘Tampa, Florida 33607 mmaitland@conroysimberg.com
thamir.kaddouri@tampalaw.org Counsel for Advanced Wrapping and Concrete
service@tampalaw.org Solutions of Central Florida, Ine.
Counsel for Imperial Building Corporation
Bruce R. Calderon, Esq. Andrew 'T. Marshall, Esq.
D. Bryan Hill, Esq. HAMILTON, PRICE & MARSHALL, P.A
Audra R. Creech, Esq. 2400 Manatee Ave. W.
MILBER MAKRIS PLOUSADIS & Bradenton, FL 34205
SEIDEN, LLP Andrew@hamihonpricelaw.com
1900 NW Corporate Blvd. Nancy@hamiltonpricelaw.com
East Tower, Suite 440 Kelsey@hamiltonpricelaw.com
Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Counsel for Te=M Construction of Sanford, Inc.
bealderon@milbermakris.com
dhill@milbermakris.com
acreech@milbermakris.com
Counsel for Brown + Company Architecture, Ine.
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings
Page 6 of 7
Law Office of Amy L. Warpinski
Joseph L. Zollner
Florida Bar No. 188506
PO Box 7217
London, KY 40742
Telephone: 904-346-5422
Facsimile: 866-270-1372
Counsel for Lios Concrete Corp
Primary: FloridaCDLegalMail@LibertyMutual.com
Secondary: joseph.zollner@libertymutual.com
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Lios Concrete Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Proceedings
Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT ‘B’
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA
VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not for profit
corporation;
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Vv.
ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company; ADVANCED WRAPPING AND
CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation; DON
KING’S CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation;
HUGH MACDONALD CONSTRUCTION, INC., a
Florida corporation; IMPERIAL BUILDING
CORPORATION, a Florida corporation;
PREMIER PLASTERING OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC. N/K/A TGK STUCCO, INC., a
Florida corporation; WEATHERMASTER
BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida
corporation; WEINTRAUB INSPECTIONS &
FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A > WEINTRAUB
ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS, INC., a
Florida corporation; THE DIMILLO GROUP, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company; WOLF’S
IRRIGATIONS & LANDSCAPING, INC., a Florida
corporation; SUMMERPARK HOMES, INC., a
Florida corporation; BROWN + COMPANY
ARCHITECTURE, INC., a Florida corporation,
Defendants.
/
ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company;
Crossclaim Plaintiff,
v.
ADVANCE WRAPPING AND CONCRETE
SOLUTIONS OF CENTREL FLORIDA, INC., a
Florida Corporation; DON KING’S CONCRETE,
INC., a Florida Corporation; HUGH
MACDONALD CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida
corporation; IMPERIAL BUILDING
CORPORATION, a Florida corporation;
PREMIER PLASTERING OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC. N/K/A TGK STUCCO, INC., a
Florida corporation; WEATHERMASTER
BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida
corporation; WEINTRAUB INSPECTIONS &
FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A —WEINTRAUB
ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS, INC., a
Florida corporation; WOLF’S IRRIGATIONS &
LANDSCAPING, INC., a Florida corporation;
BROWN + COMPANY ARCHITECTURE, INC., a
Florida corporation,
Crossclaim Defendants.
DON KING’S CONCRETE, INC.,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
Vv.
LIOS CONCRETE CORP., a Florida corporation;
E.R.O. CONSTRUCTION, a Florida corporation;
and ATLANTIC CONCRETE SYSTEMS, INC., a
Florida Corporation,
Third-Party Defendants.
/
DON KING'S CONCRETE, INC.’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
LIOS CONCRETE CORP.
COMES NOW the Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff DON KING’S CONCRETE,
INC., by and through its undersigned counsel, serves its Request for Production of
Documents upon Third-Party Defendant, LIOS CONCRETE CORP. and requests that
same be responded to within the time and in the manner prescribed by Rule 1.350 of
the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
Definitions
For the purposes of these Requests, the terms used are defined as follows:
1 The “Project” shall mean the construction project commonly referred to as
the Villas at Emerald Lake, located in Osceola County, Florida which is the subject of
this litigation.
2. “Litigation” shall mean the above-captioned lawsuit.
3. “DON KING’S” shall mean the Defendant DON KING’S CONCRETE,
INC., its agents, employees and representatives.
4 “You,” “Your,” or “LIOS” shall mean LIOS CONCRETE CORP.., its agents,
employees and representatives.
5. The “Complaint” shall mean the Complaint and all amendments filed by
VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. in this Litigation
and any amendments thereto.
6. The “CROSSCLAIM” shall mean the Crossclaim and all amendments filed
by ROYAL OAK in this Litigation and any amendments thereto.
7. “Document” shall mean: any written or graphic matter or other means of
preserving thought or expression, all tangible things from which information can be
processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether
different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copy or otherwise,
including, but not limited to, correspondence, email, memoranda, notes, messages,
letters, telegrams, teletype, telefax, bulletins, or other communications, diaries,
chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charges, ledgers, invoices, expense
vouchers, payroll stubs, purchase orders, worksheets, receipts, returns, computer print-
outs, prospectuses, financial statements and balance sheets, schedules, work orders,
affidavits, contracts, minutes, canceled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys,
magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and
modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), photographs, charts,
graphs, microfiche, microfilm, videotape, recordings or representations of any kind
(including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs, and electronically stored
information, however created, depicted or stored, e.g., on computer, disk diskette, CD,
tape, or zip, jazz, hard, network, or other drive, or by photographic, mechanical, digital,
optical, electronic, or any other means).
8 The word “and” or “or” shall be construed conjunctively or disjunctively as
necessary to make the request inclusive rather than exclusive.
9. The singular form of a noun or pronoun shall be considered to include
within its meaning the plural form of the noun or pronoun so used, and vice versa; and
the use of any tense of any verb shall be considered to include also within its meaning
all other tenses of the verb so used.
10. “Related to,” “relate to,” or “relating to” shall mean directly or indirectly
mentioning or describing, pertaining to, being connected with, or reflecting upon a
stated subject matter.
11. “Person” or “persons” shall mean each and every individual, corporation,
partnership, joint venture, social, or political organization, or any other entity, whether
real or judicial, incorporated or unincorporated, encompassed within the usual and
customary meaning of “person” or “persons.”
12. The term “communication” shall mean any manner or form of information
or message transmission, however produced or reproduced, whether by “document” as
herein defined or orally or otherwise, which is made, distributed or circulated between or
among persons, or data storage or processing units, and any and all documents
containing, consisting of, or relating or referring, in any way, either directly or indirectly,
to a communication.
13. “Identify” with respect to Persons means to state a Person’s full name,
present or last known address, and, when referring to a natural Person, additionally, the
present or last known place of employment. If the business and home telephone
numbers are known to you, and if the Person is not employed by you, said telephone
numbers shall be provided. “Identify” with respect to any corporation means to give, to
the extent known: (a) its full name; (b) its place and date of incorporation; (c) its present
or last known address and principal place of business; and (d) the identity of officers or
other Persons having knowledge of the matter with respect to which such corporation is
named. “Identify” with respect to any other legal entity means to give, to the extent
known: (a) its full name and type of entity, e.g, partnership or sole proprietorship; (b) its
present or last known address and principal place of business; and (c) the identity of
officers or other Persons having knowledge of the matter with respect to which such
Person is named. “Identify” with respect to each document means to give, to the extent
known: (a) the type of document; (b) the general subject matter; (c) the date of the
document; (d) the author(s), addressee(s) and recipient(s); (e) the date and manner of
its distribution; and (f) the location of each copy of the document and the identity of
those Persons who have possession, custody or control of each such copy. “Identify”
with respect to oral communications means to give, to the extent known: (a) the
communication medium, i.e., in person or telephonic; (b) the date of each such
communication; (c) the full name and current business and residence address of those
who participated in each communication; and (d) the substance and nature of each
such communication.
DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED
DON KING’S request that LIOS CONCRETE CORP. produce all of the following:
1 Any and all contracts, agreements, invoices or work orders executed
between You and DON KING’S in connection with the Project.
2. All documents referring to labor, services, or materials furnished by You to
DON KING’S at the Project.
3. All documents referring to the condition of labor, services, or materials
furnished by You to DON KING’S at the Project.
4. All documents referring to the construction, inspection or evaluation of
labor, services, or materials furnished by You to DON KING’S at the Project.
5. All correspondence with insurance carriers, and proof of loss claims for
coverage or indemnification relating to the Project.
6. All notes, journals, calendars, daily logs, memoranda, reports, or meeting
minutes prepared or maintained by You relating to the Project.
7. All documents related to the planning and construction of the Project.
8. All documents related to complaints, reports, investigations, or
remediation with respect to Your Work for the Project.
9. All communications or documents between You and anyone related to
any alleged construction defects, whether relating to Your scope of work or others,
with respect to the Project.
10. All photographs, video or audio recordings, drawings, maps, plans,
specifications, graphs, charts, diagrams, or any other visual or audible depictions with
respect to the Project.
11. All statements that have been taken of any parties, witnesses, or other
individuals that relate to the Project or this Litigation.
12. All communications between You and any other party in this Litigation, its
agents, employees, or insurers regarding the Project.
13. All plans, specifications, details, drawings, photographs, surveys and/or
charts pertaining to, or concerning, Your furnishing of labor, services, or materials on
the Project.
14. All documents dealing with work performed or materials furnished by any
contractor or subcontractor on behalf of LIOS relating to the Project.
15. Any and all insurance policies that may provide any coverages for any of
the claims alleged in the underlying complaint in this matter.
16. All correspondence, emails, or other communication detailing reservation
of rights or declination of coverage to LIOS as referenced in your response to
Interrogatory Number 11.
17. All documents referred to in Your answers to DON KING’S First Set of
Interrogatories to LIOS.
BUTLER WEIHMULLER KATZ CRAIG LLP
Dire Ofer—,
DENISE M. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Florida Bar No.: 0029602
danderson@butler.legal
DAVID A. MERCER, ESQ.
Florida Bar No.: 156035
dmercer@butler.legal
Secondary: krieck@butler.legal
tbarry@butler.legal
400 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 2300
Tampa, Florida 33602
Telephone: (813) 281-1900
Facsimile: (813) 281-0900
Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff
Don King’s Concrete, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
| hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically
filed with the Clerk of the Court by using the Florida E-Portal and that a true and correct
copy of the foregoing has been furnished to the following addressees and to all counsel
of record via the Florida E-Portal and/or Electronic Mail on this 9° day of September,
2021.
Phillip E. Joseph, Esq. Lannie D. Hough Jr., Esq.
Evan J. Small, Esq. Robin Leavengood, Esq.
Allana D.E. Smith, Esq. James Michael Walls, Esq.
Jeffery A, Widelitz, Esq. Brian C. Porter, Esq.
Ball Janik, LLP Carlton Fields
201 E. Pine Street, Suite 600 4221 W. Boy Scout Blvd., Suite 1000
Orlando, Florida 32801 Tampa, Florida 33607
pjoseph@balljanik.com mwalls@carltonfields.com
esmall@balljanik.com rleavengood@carltonfields.com
jwidelitz@pballjanik.com lhough@carltonfields.com
asmith@balljanik.com bporter@carltonfields.com
ypalmer@balljanik.com ejohnson@carltonfields.com
cbetancourt@balljanik.com nbonilla@carltonfields.com
bburton@balljanik.com bwoolard@carltonfields.com
dmiksell@balljanik.com
orlandodocket@balljanik.com Counsel for Royal Oak Homes, LLC
Counsel for Plaintiff
Paul Sidney Elliott, Esq. Peter J. Kapsales, Esq.
P.O. Box 274204 Margaret M. Efta, Esq.
Tampa, FL 33688-4204 Milne Law Group, P.A.
pse@psejd.com 301 E. Pine Street, Suite 525
Orlando, FL 32801
Counsel for Hugh MacDonald pkapsales@milnelawgroup.com
Construction, Inc. mefta@milnelawgroup.com
eservice@milnelawgroup.com
Counsel for Weathermaster Building
Products, Inc.
Thamir A.R. Kaddouri Jr., Esq. Timothy C. Ford, Esq.
Penelope T. Rowlett, Esq. Andrew E. Holway, Esq.
Beth Ann Tobey, Esq. Rocco Cafaro, Esq.
Law Office of Thamir A.R. Kaddouri, Jr., Hill Ward Henderson
P.A. 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 3700
3220 West Cypress Street Tampa, Florida 33602
Tampa, FL 33607 tim.ford@hwhlaw.com
Thamir.Kaddouri@tampalaw.org andrew.holway@hwhlaw.com
Service@TampaLaw.org tracy.coale@hwhlaw.com
kathy.wernsing@hwhlaw.com
Counsel for Imperial Building derrick.calandra@hwhlaw.com
Corporation rocco.cafaro@hwhlaw.com
Counsel for Weintraub Inspections &
Forensics, Inc. f/k/a Weintraub
Engineering and Inspections, Inc.
Jayne Ann Pittman, Esq. Bruce R. Calderon, Esq.
Conroy Simberg D. Bryan Hill, Esq.
Two South Orange Ave, Suite 300 Audra R. Creech, Esq.
Orlando, Florida 32801 Milber Makris Plousadis & Seiden, LLP
eserviceorl@conroysimberg.com 1900 NW Corporate Blvd, East Tower,
jpittman@conroysimberg.com Suite 440
mmaitland@conroysimberg.com Boca Raton, Florida 33431
eserviceorl@conroysimberg.com bcalderon@milbermakris.com
nfischer@conroysimberg.com dhill@milbermakris.com
acreech@milbermakris.com
Counsel for Advanced Wrapping and
Concrete Solutions of Central Florida, Counsel for Brown + Company
Inc. Architecture, Inc.
Denise M. Anderson, Esq. Denise M. Anderson, Esq.
Ashley Mattingly, Esq. David A. Mercer, Esq.
Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig, LLP Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig, LLP
400 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 2300 400 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 2300
Tampa, FL 33602 Tampa, FL 33602
danderson@butler.legal danderson@butler.legal
amattingly@butler.legal dmercer@butler.legal
jjacobs@butler.legal krieck@butler.legal
rjorge@butler.legal rjorge@butler.legal
tbarry@butler.legal
Counsel for Hugh MacDonald
Construction, Inc. Counsel for Don King’s Concrete, Inc.
Scott Ross, Esq. Eric J. Netcher, Esq.
Groelle & Salmon, P.A. Walker, Revels, Greniger & Netcher, PLLC
1715 N. Westshore Blvd., Suite 320 189 S. Orange Ave., Suite 1830
Tampa, FL 33607 Orlando, FL 32801
gstcourtdocs@gspalaw.com enetcher@wrgn-law.com
sross@gspalaw.com hpaymayesh@wrgn-law.com
cebanks@gspalaw.com
mcoleman@gspalaw.com Counsel for All Glass Installations
Corp.
Counsel for Helberg Enterprises, LLC
Cole J. Copertino, Esq. Vicki Lambert, Esq.
Richard L. Russo, Esq. Alec Masson, Esq.
Wright, Fulford, Moorhead & Brown, P.A. Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo & Cohen
505 Maitland Avenue, Suite 1000 201 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 400
Altamont Springs, FL 32701 Orlando, FL 32801
ccopertino@wfmblaw.com LUKSORL-Pleadings@LS-Law.com
cbraungart@wfmblaw.com AMasson@insurancedefense.net
Iwilliams@wfmblaw.com JPestonit@insurancedefense.net
mrusso@wfbmlaw.com
Counsel for Casey Hawkins Glass, Inc.
Counsel for Well Hung Windows &
Doors, LLC
Michael D. Ruel, Esq. Andrew T. Marshall, Esq.
Brenden C. Collins, Esq. Hamilton, Price & Marshall, P.A.
Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & 2400 Manatee Ave. W.
Smith, P.L.C. Bradenton, FL 34205
400 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 1000 Andrew@hamiltonpricelaw.com
Tampa, Florida 33602 Nancy@hamiltonpricelaw.com
tampaservice@gallowaylawfirm.com Kelsey@hamiltonpricelaw.com
mruel@gallowaylawfirm.com sara@hamiltonpricelaw.com
bcollins@gallowaylawfirm.com atmservice@hamiltonpricelaw.com
Counsel for Casey Hawkins Glass, Inc. Counsel for T&M Construction of
Sanford, Inc.
Joseph L. Zollner, Esq. Chesley G. Moody, Jr. Esq.
Law Office of J. Christopher Norris Mai M. Lee, Esq.
PO Box 7217 Moody & Graf, P.A.
London, KY 40742 1101 N. Lake Destiny Road, Suite 200
FloridaCDLegalMail@LibertyMutual.com Maitland, FL 32751
joseph.zollner@libertymutual.com cmoody@moodygraf.com
mle@moodygraf.com
Counsel for Lios Concrete Corp. kpollak@moodygraf.com
tdixon@moodygraf.com
Counsel for Premier Plastering of
Central Florida, Inc.
Michael D. Ruel, Esq. Wayne M. Alder, Esq.
Kyle R. McNeal, Esq. Fisher Broyles, LLP.
Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & 7668 NW 125" Way
Smith, P.L.C. Pompano Beach, FL 33076
400 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 1000 wayne.alder@fisherbroyles.com
Tampa, FL 33602 wmalder@bellsouth.net
Tampaservice@gallowaylawfirm.com
phowell@gallowaylawfirm.com
kmcneal@gallowaylawfirm.com Counsel for E.R.O. Construction
Counsel for Casey Hawkins Glass, Inc.
Nicole Seropian, Esq. Chesley G. Moody, Jr., Esq.
Jennifer Shippole, Esq. The Law Firm of Moody & Graf, P.A.
Law Office of Jennifer Shippole 1101 N. Lake Destiny Road, Suite 200
14050 NW 14" Street, Suite 180 Maitland, FL 32751
Sunrise, FL 33323 P: 407-755-6900
jlspleadings@fednat.com F: 407-755-6913
nseropian@fednat.com cmoody@moodygraf.com
jshippole@fednat.com kpollak@moodygraf.com
Counsel for Atlantic Concrete Systems, Counsel for Wolfs Irrigation &
Inc. Landscaping, Inc.
DireIM Ohfo—
DENISE M. ANDERSON, ESQ.
10
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA
VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not for profit
corporation;
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 2020-CA-002942
Vv.
ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company; ADVANCED WRAPPING AND
CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation; DON
KING’S CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation;
HUGH MACDONALD CONSTRUCTION, INC., a