On August 28, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Doe #10,
Doe #11,
Doe #12,
Doe #13,
Doe #14,
Doe #15,
Doe #16,
Doe #17,
Doe #18,
Doe #19,
Doe #1,
Doe #2,
Doe #3,
Doe #4,
Doe #5,
Doe #6,
Doe #7,
Doe #8,
Doe #9,
and
Ascension Ventures Ii Ewc, Inc.,
Ascension Ventures, Inc.,
Does 1 -200 Inclusive,
Does 1-400, Inclusive,
Fortyfour Stones, Llc,
Massage Envy Franchising, Llc,
Me Time, Inc.,
Rme Clinics, Inc.,
S&C Therpy, Inc.,
for Complex Civil Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
-
\y
\
FILED
SAN MATEO COUNTY
MAR 1.8 2021
Clerkof _1
.'
[Com
~
By
DEPUTY CLERK
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
JANE DOE #3
vs.
Plaintiffs,
.
(DB), et a1.,
COMPLEX CIVIL LITIGATI
..
CW
.,
81v332129032
Assigned for
HlonrMaIie S.
all purposes to Dept. 2
Weiner f
MAS SAGE ENVY FRANCHISING CASE MANAGEMENTORDER #16
LLC, et a1., -.
Defendants.
. '
JANE DOE #8, et a1., .
Case No. 19CIV00392A
'
Plaintiffs, .
_
.
,
Assigned for allpurposes to Dept. 2
I
vs. Hon. Marie S. Weiner
MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING 'CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16
‘
LLC, et a1.,
Defendants.
I
JANE DOE #4, et 31., Case No. 196N003 923
Plaintiffs,
Assigned for all purposes to D'ept. 2
VS. Hon. Marie S. Weiner
MASSAGE ENVY FRANcmSING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16
LLC,'et a1.,
Defendants.
'
JANE DOE #1, ct al., Case No. 19CIV00392C
Plaintifi's; I
Assigned for ail purposes to Dept. 2
vs. Hon. Marie S. Weiner
MAS SAGE ENVY FRANCHISING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16
LLC, et a1.,
Defendants.
JANE DOE #2, et a1.,
Plaintiffs,
‘
Case No. 190N003 92D
vs. Aséigned for all purposes to Dept. 2
Hon. Marie S. Weiner
’
MASSAGE EN V Y ,FRANCHISING
LLC, et a1.,
‘
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16
Defendants.
Case No. 19CIV00392G'
'
JANE DOE #17, et a1.,
Plaintiffs,
Assigmd for all purposeé to Dept. 2
VS. Hon. Marie S.‘ Weiner
MAS SAGE ENVY FRAN'CHISING CASE MANAGENIENT ORDER #16
'
LLC, et a1.,
Defendants.
'
JANE DOE #23, Case' No. 19CIvoos92H'
'
Plaintiff,
V Assigned for all purposes to Dept. 2
vs. Hon. Marie S. Weiner
MAS SAGE ENVY FRANCHISING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16
LLC, et a1.,
Defendants.
Document Filed Date
March 18, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 28, 2019
Category
Complex Civil Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
- \y \ FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY MAR 1.8 2021 Clerkof _1 .' [Com ~ By DEPUTY CLERK SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO JANE DOE #3 vs. Plaintiffs, . (DB), et a1., COMPLEX CIVIL LITIGATI .. CW ., 81v332129032 Assigned for HlonrMaIie S. all purposes to Dept. 2 Weiner f MAS SAGE ENVY FRANCHISING CASE MANAGEMENTORDER #16 LLC, et a1., -. Defendants. . ' JANE DOE #8, et a1., . Case No. 19CIV00392A ' Plaintiffs, . _ . , Assigned for allpurposes to Dept. 2 I vs. Hon. Marie S. Weiner MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING 'CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16 ‘ LLC, et a1., Defendants. I JANE DOE #4, et 31., Case No. 196N003 923 Plaintiffs, Assigned for all purposes to D'ept. 2 VS. Hon. Marie S. Weiner MASSAGE ENVY FRANcmSING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16 LLC,'et a1., Defendants. ' JANE DOE #1, ct al., Case No. 19CIV00392C Plaintifi's; I Assigned for ail purposes to Dept. 2 vs. Hon. Marie S. Weiner MAS SAGE ENVY FRANCHISING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16 LLC, et a1., Defendants. JANE DOE #2, et a1., Plaintiffs, ‘ Case No. 190N003 92D vs. Aséigned for all purposes to Dept. 2 Hon. Marie S. Weiner ’ MASSAGE EN V Y ,FRANCHISING LLC, et a1., ‘ CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16 Defendants. Case No. 19CIV00392G' ' JANE DOE #17, et a1., Plaintiffs, Assigmd for all purposeé to Dept. 2 VS. Hon. Marie S.‘ Weiner MAS SAGE ENVY FRAN'CHISING CASE MANAGENIENT ORDER #16 ' LLC, et a1., Defendants. ' JANE DOE #23, Case' No. 19CIvoos92H' ' Plaintiff, V Assigned for all purposes to Dept. 2 vs. Hon. Marie S. Weiner MAS SAGE ENVY FRANCHISING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #16 LLC, et a1., Defendants.