arrow left
arrow right
  • STABRYLLA, STEPHANIE vs. WHITKOPF, ELIZABETHAuto Negligence document preview
  • STABRYLLA, STEPHANIE vs. WHITKOPF, ELIZABETHAuto Negligence document preview
  • STABRYLLA, STEPHANIE vs. WHITKOPF, ELIZABETHAuto Negligence document preview
  • STABRYLLA, STEPHANIE vs. WHITKOPF, ELIZABETHAuto Negligence document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 175139252 E-Filed 06/12/2023 04:20:12 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 20TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 23000551CA STEPHANIE STABRYLLA, Plaintiff, vs. ELIZABETH WHITKOPF and SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendants. / ANSWER TO COMPLAINT The Defendant, ELIZABETH WHITKOPF, by and through her undersigned attorneys, files this Answer to Complaint and would state: 1 All allegations of the Complaint not specifically admitted herein are denied. 2. If the Plaintiff has suffered injuries and/or losses as alleged, these are a proximate result of negligence committed by the Plaintiff, by reason of which the Plaintiff's recovery, if any, should be proportionately diminished under Florida's Comparative Negligence Doctrine. 3 This Defendant affirmatively alleges that Plaintiff's claim is barred by the tort exemption provisions of the Florida Vehicle No-Fault Act, Florida Statutes, Section 627.730 through 627.7405. Specifically, Plaintiff fails to meet the threshold provisions of said act outlined in Florida Statutes, Section 627.737. 4 This Defendant is entitled to a set-off from any recovery, if any, to the extent of the value of all benefits and/or settlements, paid or payable, on behalf of the Plaintiff and/or from any such collateral source payment pursuant to Florida law. Additionally, by the terms of Florida Statutes, Section 627.736(8), if special damages are introduced into evidence, damages may not be awarded for personal injury protection benefits paid or payable 5 As an affirmative defense, this Defendant does allege that the Plaintiff did not use an available and operational seatbelt, that the Plaintiff's failure to use the seatbelt was unreasonable under the circumstances, and that there is a causal relationship between the injuries alleged by the Plaintiff and the failure of the Plaintiff to use the seatbelt, wherefore, the Plaintiff cannot recover against this Defendant or, in the alternative, the Plaintiff's damages should be reduced accordingly. 6 This Defendant should be liable, if at all, only for her proportionate share of liability, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 768.81 7 This Defendant alleges that the Plaintiff has failed to mitigate her damages. 8 This Defendant demands trial by jury of all issues so triable as of right by a Jury I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been furnished by email to: DERRICK ISAAC, ESQUIRE, Attorney for Plaintiff, derrickisaac@forthepeople.com , on this 12" day of June, 2023 HILL & LEMONGELLO, P.A Attorneys for Def - Whitkopf 800 Southeast 3rd Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 954-462-3623 - main 954-523-1940 - fax Marial@hitem-law.com Primary Jo: a Secondary BY: DA ups ONGELLO FLQRIDA“BAR# 0027049