arrow left
arrow right
  • CODY KERNS ET AL VS FXWINNING, LTD. ET AL Business Torts document preview
  • CODY KERNS ET AL VS FXWINNING, LTD. ET AL Business Torts document preview
  • CODY KERNS ET AL VS FXWINNING, LTD. ET AL Business Torts document preview
  • CODY KERNS ET AL VS FXWINNING, LTD. ET AL Business Torts document preview
  • CODY KERNS ET AL VS FXWINNING, LTD. ET AL Business Torts document preview
  • CODY KERNS ET AL VS FXWINNING, LTD. ET AL Business Torts document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 193480217 E-Filed 03/06/2024 06:03:58 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: 2023-020202-CA-01 CODY KERNS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FXWINNING, LTD., et al., Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE Plaintiffs, Cody Kerns, Kerns Capital Management, Inc., and WFTMB Holdings, LLC, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) hereby file this reply in support of their Motion for Consolidation (the “Motion”), and in support, state as follows: ARGUMENT Plaintiffs conferred with Defendants, FXWinning, Ltd., David Merino, and Rafael Brito Cutie (collectively, “Defendants”) on February 20, 2024 regarding the relief requested in the Motion. A true and correct copy of the conferral email is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In that exchange, counsel for Defendants stated that Defendants: have no objection to consolidating the two actions for purposes of discovery only. We do, however, object to a complete consolidation of the two cases. We appreciate the complexity of the consolidation, and we will continue to assess whether we agree to a full consolidation once we see your motion and the grounds stated therein. Ex. A (emphasis added). 1 In an about face, Defendants now object to consolidation for any purpose including discovery. See generally [D.E. 175]. For the reasons stated in the Motion, Plaintiffs submit that the Kerns Action and the CFT Action should, at the very least, be consolidated for discovery purposes to avoid the unnecessary duplication of labor, expense, and resources. Additionally, consolidation of case management hearings, and hearings on substantially similar issues such as, the upcoming hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss for, among other things, lack of personal jurisdiction, is in the interest of judicial economy and will save the parties from expending unnecessary time, expense, and resources. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Cody Kerns, Kerns Capital Management, Inc., and WFTMB Holdings, LLC, respectfully request that the Court grant the Motion in its entirety or, alternatively, enter an Order consolidating the Kerns Action and the CFT Action for discovery purposes and case management, and for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and appropriate. Dated: March 6, 2024 Respectfully submitted, SANCHEZ FISCHER LEVINE, LLP 1200 Brickell Avenue, Suite 750 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 925-9947 By: /s/ David M. Levine David M. Levine, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 84431 Email: dlevine@sfl-law.com Secondary: eservice@sfl-law.com Fausto Sanchez, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 86229 Email: fsanchez@sfl-law.com Robert Kemper, Esq. Florida Bar. No.: 1038549 Email: rkemper@sfl-law.com Counsel for Plaintiffs 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 6, 2024 a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of record via the Florida Courts eFiling Portal. By: /s/ David M. Levine David M. Levine, Esq. 3