On February 23, 2021 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Jason Penna,
and
Angelo G. Tranquillo,
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. As Nominee For Homebridge Financial Services, Inc.,
for P10 - Property - Partition
in the District Court of New Haven County.
Preview
DOCKET NO: AAN-CV21-6041868-S : SUPERIOR COURT
JASON PENNA : J.D. OF ANSONIA/MILFORD
VS. : AT MILFORD
ANGELO G. TRANQUILLO AND
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION :
SYSTEMS, INC. as NOMINEE FOR
HOMEBRIDGE
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. : FEBRUARY 29, 2024
DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND SANCTIONS
The defendant respectfully objects to the plaintiff’s Motion for Order dated February 21,
2024 (No. 142.00.). In support thereof, it is admitted that depositions were noticed for February
20, 2024. Unfortunately, defense counsel got a notice for a hearing on the same date as well as a
deposition for a case which begins trial this month. Defense counsel attempted to get coverage
and was unsuccessful in securing coverage in the office. For that reason, defense counsel had to
notify plaintiff’s counsel that the depositions could not go forward on February 20th. In the e-
mail to plaintiff’s counsel, defense counsel indicated that if there was a cost for late cancellation
for the court reporter that this office would cover said cost. More importantly, defense counsel
provided an alternative date of March 8, 2024. Rather than responding to the offered date,
plaintiff’s counsel filed the Motion for Order at issue.
Respectfully, as this court well knows, court dates are assigned often without any input
from the attorneys involved in the case. As attempted to be explained to plaintiff’s counsel,
unfortunately, a court date was assigned for February 20th. Again, defense counsel attempted to
secure coverage and was unsuccessful and therefore had no choice but to cancel the depositions.
Again, defense counsel offered to cover the costs if there was such a cost for a late cancellation
and further offered up March 8th as an opportunity to take the depositions. Again, rather than
attempting to work out this issue, plaintiff’s counsel filed this motion.
Respectfully, the defendant asks that the Motion for Order be denied. In the alternative,
we ask that we be allowed to provide a date in which the depositions can take place. In fact, we
are ready and prepared to do the depositions on a weekend if that is what is required between
both attorneys’ court calendars. Again, respectfully, the defendant objects to this Motion for
Order.
THE DEFENDANT
ANGELO TRANQUILLO
/s/ Patrick M. Mullins
Patrick M. Mullins, Esq.
COTTER, COTTER & MULLINS, LLC
6515 Main Street, Second Floor
Trumbull, CT 06611
Telephone: (203) 331-0774
Juris No. 414935
ORDER
The foregoing Objection is hereby:
SUSTAINED/OVERRULED
Clerk/Judge
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was electronically filed and/or mailed,
postage prepaid, on February 29, 2024 to the following counsel of record and pro se parties:
Francis Lieto, Esq.
Goldman Gruder Woods, LLC
105 Technology Drive
Trumbull, CT 06611
flieto@goldmangruderwoods.com
STeixeira@goldgru.com
BENDETT & MCHUGH PC
270 FARMINGTON AVENUE
SUITE 151
FARMINGTON, CT 06032
WDziedzic@bmpc-law.com
/s/ Patrick M. Mullins
Patrick M. Mullins
Document Filed Date
February 29, 2024
Case Filing Date
February 23, 2021
Category
P10 - Property - Partition
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.