arrow left
arrow right
  • HYLE -V- RODRIGUEZ, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • HYLE -V- RODRIGUEZ, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • HYLE -V- RODRIGUEZ, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • HYLE -V- RODRIGUEZ, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

\u \a ugh Tracy W. Goldberg, State Bar No. 128681 t KEITH L. SHOJI & ASSOCIATES summoa'iAu‘aT‘apcDAumm Employees of the Law Department COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 1600 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 DEC 19 2023 Telephone: (951) 328-2000 / Fax: (855) 811-3889 Email Address: Shoji@StateFarm.com BY Attorneys for Defendant(s) Arianne DEBRAPEDHOSADEPU" Athena Rodriguez, David J. Rodriguez, and Elia M. Aguilar SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JOHN HYLE, No.2 CIVDS 1907037 Plaintiff, Nmm‘CdNéO‘DmNOUI#WNd°@mNOUIhO-DN ARIANNA ATHENA RODRIGUEZ, v. (3m JUDGMENT DAVID J. RODRIGUEZ, ELIA M. Complaint Filed: 03/06/19 AGUILAR, Trial Date: 10/23/23 Defendants. i This action came on for trial on October 23, 2023, in Department NNNNNNNN—LAAAAAAd—LA $27 of the San Bernardino County Superior Court, the Honorable Thomas ORHGRNN S. Garza, Judge presiding; Plaintiff John Hyle appearing along with his counsel of record Lauren Vogt and Lynn P. Whitlock, and defendant Arianna Athena Rodriguez appearing along with her attorneys of record Tracy W. Goldberg and Heather K. Gray and David Erghelegiu of Keith L. Shoji and Associates. A jury of twelve individuals was regularly impaneled and sworn. FAXED Witnesses were sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel and having been duly instructed by the court. the cause was submitted to the jury with directions to return a verdict. The Nm jury deliberated and rendered its verdict on November 14, 2023. _ 1 _ (PROPOSED) JUDGMENT \a \u The jury found in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant as follows: Question No. 1: Was Arianna Athena Rodriguez negligent? ANSWER: YES Question No. 2: Was Arianna Athena Rodriguez negligence a substantial O‘DmeU’I-th-fi factor in causing harm to John Hyle? ANSWER: YES Question No. 3: What are John Hyle’s damages? a. Past economic loss loss earnings: $0 medical expenses: $2,407.00 b. Past noneconomic loss, including physical pain and mental suffering $0 Total: $2,407.00 It appearing by reason of said verdict that plaintiff John Hyle is entitled to judgment against defendant Arianna Athena Rodriguez. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGES AND DECREED that said plaintiff John Hyle shall and does have judgment against defendant, Arianna Athena Rodriguez in the amount of two thousand four hundred and seven dollars ($2,407.00). DATED: No mbequj_ 2023 Hon/THOMAS s. GARZAQDGE - 2 - (PROPOSED) JUDGMENT