On June 11, 2020 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Duke Realty Limited Partnership,
Insurance Company Of The West,
Madrigal, Adriana Quintero,
Marquez, Rafael Carvajal,
and
Does 2-100,
Duke Realty Corporation,
Duke Realty Limited Partnership,
Genie Industries, Inc.,
Gregg Electric, Inc.,
I.E. General Engineering Inc.,
King Equipment, Llc,
Terex Corporation,
General Engineering, Inc,
Gregg Electric, Inc., I.E.,
King Equipment, Inc.,
Roes 2 To 100,
for Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
ORIGINAL
George Knopfler (SBN 94041)
Ruzan Stepanyan (SBN 299108) SUPERIORFCgUiR-TgF
?ALIFORN
HAMRICK & EVANS, LLP 0F SAN BERNARDINO'A
03mg;*RNARD'NO
2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 1020 D’STRICT
Burbank, California 91505
FEB 2 2
Telephone No.: (818) 763-5292
Fax No.: (818) 763-2308
Attorneys for Defendant,
LE. GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.
BY gx 202'
SAMANTLA NEU BAUER DEPUFY
'
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OOOOVON
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
RAFAEL CARVAJAL MARQUEZ; ADRIANA Case No.: CIVD820103 0 1
QUINTERO MADRIGAL;
[Unlimited Jurisdiction]
11 Plaintiffs,
LLP vs. (Assigned t0 Hon. Donald Alvarez - Dept.
12 S23)
GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC.; TEREX
EVANS, 13 CORPORATION; DUKE REALTY LIMITED DEFENDANT LE. GENERAL
PARTNERSHIP; DUKE REALTY ENGINEERING,INC.’S AMENDED
14 CORPORATION; GREGG ELECTRIC, INC., and ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’
& DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, COMPLAINT
15
HAMRICK 16
Defendants. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL é
LL
17 ComplaintFiled: 06/11/2020 >-
18
m
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
19
Defendant LE. GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC. (“I.E. General Engineering”) for itself
20
and for no other Defendants, hereby answers the unverified Complaint of Plaintiffs RAFAEL
21
CARVAJAL MARQUEZ and ADRIANA QUINTERO MADRIGAL (“Plaintiffs”), as follows:
22
GENERAL DENIAL
23
Pursuant to the provisions of §43 l .30(d) 0f the Code of Civil Procedure, and by reason 0f
24
the fact that the Complaint is unverified, I.E. General Engineering denies, both generally and
25
specifically, each and every allegation and Cause of Action contained in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and
26
the whole thereof, and specifically denies that Plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought. LE.
27
General Engineering further denies that Plaintiffs have been, or will be, damaged in the sum or
28
-3-
DEFENDANT LE. GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.’S AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT
o ‘éfl
no
v.6
296w @
4’\
€40?
'94“;
(a
éfl‘gqp
flé‘2;
v9
{no ev
14,00
‘ogo r}
g¢a
9% ¥
2%
90
'
‘
\r
‘ ‘
V
Document Filed Date
February 22, 2021
Case Filing Date
June 11, 2020
Category
Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.