arrow left
arrow right
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

ORIGINAL George Knopfler (SBN 94041) Ruzan Stepanyan (SBN 299108) SUPERIORFCgUiR-TgF ?ALIFORN HAMRICK & EVANS, LLP 0F SAN BERNARDINO'A 03mg;*RNARD'NO 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 1020 D’STRICT Burbank, California 91505 FEB 2 2 Telephone No.: (818) 763-5292 Fax No.: (818) 763-2308 Attorneys for Defendant, LE. GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC. BY gx 202' SAMANTLA NEU BAUER DEPUFY ' SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OOOOVON FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RAFAEL CARVAJAL MARQUEZ; ADRIANA Case No.: CIVD820103 0 1 QUINTERO MADRIGAL; [Unlimited Jurisdiction] 11 Plaintiffs, LLP vs. (Assigned t0 Hon. Donald Alvarez - Dept. 12 S23) GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC.; TEREX EVANS, 13 CORPORATION; DUKE REALTY LIMITED DEFENDANT LE. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; DUKE REALTY ENGINEERING,INC.’S AMENDED 14 CORPORATION; GREGG ELECTRIC, INC., and ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ & DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, COMPLAINT 15 HAMRICK 16 Defendants. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL é LL 17 ComplaintFiled: 06/11/2020 >- 18 m TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 19 Defendant LE. GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC. (“I.E. General Engineering”) for itself 20 and for no other Defendants, hereby answers the unverified Complaint of Plaintiffs RAFAEL 21 CARVAJAL MARQUEZ and ADRIANA QUINTERO MADRIGAL (“Plaintiffs”), as follows: 22 GENERAL DENIAL 23 Pursuant to the provisions of §43 l .30(d) 0f the Code of Civil Procedure, and by reason 0f 24 the fact that the Complaint is unverified, I.E. General Engineering denies, both generally and 25 specifically, each and every allegation and Cause of Action contained in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and 26 the whole thereof, and specifically denies that Plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought. LE. 27 General Engineering further denies that Plaintiffs have been, or will be, damaged in the sum or 28 -3- DEFENDANT LE. GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.’S AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT o ‘éfl no v.6 296w @ 4’\ €40? '94“; (a éfl‘gqp flé‘2; v9 {no ev 14,00 ‘ogo r} g¢a 9% ¥ 2% 90 ' ‘ \r ‘ ‘ V