arrow left
arrow right
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • MARQUEZ et al -v- GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Kimberly S. Oberrecht [C.S.B. No. 190794] '” Dawn C. Nelms [C.S.B. No. 222845] 5 L E- S'égfigchOURT OF CAL; 3N“ Q HORTON, OBERRECHT & KIRKPATRICK SAN BERNAWNB 101 W. Broadway, Suite 600 55%:‘1’99 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 232—1 183; Fax (619) 696-5719 APR O 7 2022 \OOOQONUIAUJNr—n Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant, _ DUKE REALTY Hmmm 3v g SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RAFAEL CARVAJAL MARQUEZ; ADIANA ) CASE NO. CIVD82010310 QUINTERO MADRIGAL, ) [Assigned to Hon. Donald R. Alvarez, ) Dept. 8-23] Plaintiffs, ) ) NOTICE OF RULING 0N VS. ) DEFENDANT DUKE REALTY ) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP’S GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC; TEREX MOTION FOR SUMMARY CORPORATION; DUKE REALTY LIMITED g JUDGMENT, 0R IN THE PARTNERSHIP; DUKE REALTY ) ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR CORPORATION; GREGG ELECTRIC, INC; I.E. ) SUMMARY ADJUDICATION GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.; and DOES 1- ) 100, Inclusive, Date: September 21 2021 ) , ) Time: 9:00 a.m. Defendants. ) Dept: 23 NNNNNNNNNHI—AHr—ny—np—‘p—np—AHH ) Judge: Hon. Donald R. Alvarez ) AND ALL RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. ) Complaint Filed: 06/1 1/20 ) Trial Date: 5/9/22 OONONUIAUJNHO©OOQOUIJ>WNHO ) TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Adjudication of Defendant and moving party, DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, came on for hearing in the above named Coun on September 2 1 2021 , at 9:00 a.m. in Department 23, before the Honorable Donald R. Alvarez. Attorneys for all parties appeared. / / / / / / / / / NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION G:\CLIENTS\6724\Pleadings\MSJ Duke Realty\Notice of Ruling.wpd 1 V ‘ \r Having considered the papers in support of the Motion for Summary Judgment and good cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTED Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dated: February 18, 2022 HORTON, OBERRECHT & KIRKPATRICK \OOOQONUl-bUJNH QMQXV Kimberly S. Oberrecht, Dawn C. Nelms, Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant, DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NNNNNNNNNHHHD—Ip—dr—IHt—tt—tt—I OOQONM-bWNF—‘OCOOQQM#WNHO NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT DUKE REALTY LHVIITED PARTNERSHIP’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION G:\CLIENTS\6724\PIeadings\MSJ Duke Realty\Notice of Ruling.wpd 2