On January 27, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hardy, Illya,
Hardy, Johanna Barlund,
Topline K9 Services,
and
Animal Emergency Clinic,
Rios, Dvm, Grace,
for Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
F l L
SUPERIOR COURTEF CALIFORNIA
OUNTY 0" A MC “N;
p—n
swss- ?s‘
smsgv
DEC 1. 1
2023
ooo'oxlcxmh’wm
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ILLYA HARDY, an individual; ) Case No. CIV DS 2002744
JOHANNA BARLUND HARDY, an ) Dept. $28
individual; TOPLINE K9 SERVICES, )
Plaintiffs, UDGME T ON SPECIAL VERDICT
vs.
V
GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., an Individual;
ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC; and
DOES 1- 50, inclusive,
-NNNNNNa—-v—Iu—~—n—tu—nu—a.u——_
Defendants.
MAWN-‘OOOOVQw-DWNH
This action came on regularly for trial on October 23, 2023, in Department
“$28” of the above entitled court, before the Honorable Michael A. Sachs, Judge
presiding. Plaintiffs appeared by their counsel, Jill L. Ryther of Ryther Law
Group; defendants appeared by their counsel George M. Wallace of Wallace,
Brown & Schwartz. Following a trial duly conducted, the sworn jury of 12
members returned its Special Verdict on November 8, 2023, duly filed in the
Judgment - Page 1
records of the Court. The Special Verdict of thejury determined the matters
submitted as follows:
On the plaintiffs’ cause of action for negligence, the jury found in favor of
the defendants and against the plaintiffs.
On the plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to obtain informed consent, the
o'xoooqom'AwN—W
jury found in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs.
On the plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of bailment, thejury found in
favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs.
It appearing by reason of the special verdict that defendants are entitled to
—a
judgment in their favor on all claims ofthe plaintiffs asserted in this action, NOW,
—t
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED
fl That Judgment is entered in favor 0f defendants GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., and
AWN—
ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC, and that plaintiffs ILLYA HARDY,
~.-—
JOHANNA BARLUND HARDY, and TOPLINE K9 SERVICES shall take
fl nothing by this action.
GNU]
—a
Defendants shall recover their costs of suit herein in an amount to be
—t
N determined upon presentation of their Memorandum of Costs.
rd
m
H O DATED: DEC ll 2023
N
N N—o JudgefSu rior
0L
Court
M!CHAEL A. SACHS
N.N
N mhw
N
Judgment - Page 2
Document Filed Date
December 11, 2023
Case Filing Date
January 27, 2020
Category
Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
F l L SUPERIOR COURTEF CALIFORNIA OUNTY 0" A MC “N; p—n swss- ?s‘ smsgv DEC 1. 1 2023 ooo'oxlcxmh’wm SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ILLYA HARDY, an individual; ) Case No. CIV DS 2002744 JOHANNA BARLUND HARDY, an ) Dept. $28 individual; TOPLINE K9 SERVICES, ) Plaintiffs, UDGME T ON SPECIAL VERDICT vs. V GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., an Individual; ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC; and DOES 1- 50, inclusive, -NNNNNNa—-v—Iu—~—n—tu—nu—a.u——_ Defendants. MAWN-‘OOOOVQw-DWNH This action came on regularly for trial on October 23, 2023, in Department “$28” of the above entitled court, before the Honorable Michael A. Sachs, Judge presiding. Plaintiffs appeared by their counsel, Jill L. Ryther of Ryther Law Group; defendants appeared by their counsel George M. Wallace of Wallace, Brown & Schwartz. Following a trial duly conducted, the sworn jury of 12 members returned its Special Verdict on November 8, 2023, duly filed in the Judgment - Page 1 records of the Court. The Special Verdict of thejury determined the matters submitted as follows: On the plaintiffs’ cause of action for negligence, the jury found in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. On the plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to obtain informed consent, the o'xoooqom'AwN—W jury found in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. On the plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of bailment, thejury found in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. It appearing by reason of the special verdict that defendants are entitled to —a judgment in their favor on all claims ofthe plaintiffs asserted in this action, NOW, —t THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED fl That Judgment is entered in favor 0f defendants GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., and AWN— ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC, and that plaintiffs ILLYA HARDY, ~.-— JOHANNA BARLUND HARDY, and TOPLINE K9 SERVICES shall take fl nothing by this action. GNU] —a Defendants shall recover their costs of suit herein in an amount to be —t N determined upon presentation of their Memorandum of Costs. rd m H O DATED: DEC ll 2023 N N N—o JudgefSu rior 0L Court M!CHAEL A. SACHS N.N N mhw N Judgment - Page 2