arrow left
arrow right
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • Guadalupe Coronel VS. COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, Danny Cruz FuentesInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically Filed 1/19/2024 2:42 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Dana Cavazos CAUSE NO. C-0853-23-A GUADALUPE CORONEL : IN THE DISTRICT COURT : V. : 92ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT : COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS DBA : COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, INC. : AND DANNY CRUZ FUENTES : HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES Defendant, COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, INC. d/b/a COAST TROPICAL (incorrectly named COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS DBA COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS, INC.)(“COAST”) and DANNY CRUZ FUENTES and files this their Amended Answer, and in support thereof would show the Court as follows: I. General Denial Defendants deny each and every material allegation in Plaintiff’s petition contained, and say that the same are not true, in whole or in part, and demand strict proof thereof. II. Sole Proximate Cause/Comparative and Contributory Negligence Defendants affirmatively assert the doctrine of sole proximate cause, comparative negligence and contributory negligence and says that it was the negligence of Plaintiff who solely caused, or in the alternative, contributed to the alleged accident made the basis of this suit and any and all damages, if any, claimed by the Plaintiff. DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER [en] FILES\C\1436\PLEADINGS\AANSWER Page 1 Electronically Filed 1/19/2024 2:42 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Dana Cavazos III. Limitation on Recovery of Medical Expenses Defendants affirmatively assert that recovery of medical or healthcare expenses incurred is limited to the amount actually paid or incurred by or on behalf of the Plaintiff. See §41.0105 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. IV. Workers’ compensation exclusive remedy Defendants affirmatively assert that Plaintiff is barred from recovery from Defendants pursuant §408.001 of the Texas Labor Code which provides that workers’ compensation benefits is the exclusive remedy of an employee covered by workers’ compensation insurance coverage for a work-related injury sustained by the employee. Defendants are entitled to the exclusive remedy provision under §408.001 and §93.004(b) of the Texas Labor Code because Defendant COAST is the client of Ready Men Staffing, LLC, a temporary employment service that carried workers' compensation insurance at the time of the accident that covered Plaintiff. As a result, Plaintiff is statutorily barred from bringing suit and recovering against Defendants. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants pray that upon final hearing hereof that they be discharged without liability and for such other and further relief, both at law or in equity, to which they may show themselves justly entitled to receive. DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER [en] FILES\C\1436\PLEADINGS\AANSWER Page 2 Electronically Filed 1/19/2024 2:42 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Dana Cavazos Respectfully submitted, ADAMS & GRAHAM, L.L.P. 134 E. Van Buren, Suite 301 Harlingen, TX 78550 (956) 428-7495 (956) 428-2954 (fax) By: /s/ Barry Ray BARRY RAY State Bar No. 16606355 Email: bray@adamsgraham.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing instrument was forwarded to the following counsel of record on this the 19th day of January, 2024. Ruy Mireles Via E-filing LAW OFFICES OF MARIO DAVILA, PLLC P. O. Box 3726 McAllen, Texas 78502 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Barry Ray BARRY RAY DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER [en] FILES\C\1436\PLEADINGS\AANSWER Page 3 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Barry Ray on behalf of Barry Ray Bar No. 16606355 bray@adamsgraham.com Envelope ID: 83594350 Filing Code Description: Amended Filing Filing Description: C-1436-Defendants' Amended Answer Status as of 1/19/2024 3:03 PM CST Associated Case Party: Guadalupe Coronel Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status RUY MIRELES ruymdlaw@gmail.com 1/19/2024 2:42:19 PM SENT Alma Stutzner almasmdlaw@gmail.com 1/19/2024 2:42:19 PM SENT Associated Case Party: COAST CITRUS DISTRIBUTORS Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Barry Ray bray@adamsgraham.com 1/19/2024 2:42:19 PM SENT Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status MARIO DAVILA MDLAWLITIGATION@GMAIL.COM 1/19/2024 2:42:19 PM SENT