Preview
URT.O7
Me SUPERIOR COURT
Tamarah Harber-Pickens
Telephone 661-868-5393
Clerk of the Superior Court
Se cas
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield CA 93301
iB
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE Date 07/21/2021
COMPANY Case No.. BCV-20-100473
RETURNED VIA EFILE Case Name ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
ERNEST VARGAS COMPANY VS PAVLETICH ELECTRIC &
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Document: PROOF OF SERVICE
The attached papers are being returned for the following reason(s): 1 Check # Returned
This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County.
The attached document is an improper ex-parte communication and has not been considered by the Court.
Fee of $, required or a Request to Waive Court Fees must be submitted.
Application for Waiver of Fees missing attachment(s):
CO Last three (3) paystubs, if employed.
O Certified Copy of Statement of Account for previous six (6) months certified by Dept. of Corrections
C1 Trust Account Withdrawal Order form (CDC form 193) completed by the Dept. of Corrections
indicating $3.00 fee to Dept. of Corrections has been paid or insufficient funds in the account to cover.
Does not conform to Rule 2.100-2.119, California Rules of Court, as to form and format.
Superior Court case number is wrong, incomplete, or missing.
Consolidated matter: All consolidated case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case listed
first.
Consolidated matter:
Title is incorrect or missing parties.
Summons does not conform to complaint/cross-complaint/petition.
Not an original. Copies are not acceptable.
Copies must be provided if endorsed copies are requested. Submit one original plus copy(ies).
Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule/Code:
Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form.
is not eligible for filing. Reason:
Item(s) # incomplete.
Missing required forms/attachment:
Original Will must be presented at the time of filing petition.
Signature missing:
Date and place of execution not completed.
Document(s) must be verified.
Show date, time, and location of hearing pursuant to California Rules of Court.
The date you have noticed this matter is a Court holiday/weekend.
Acknowledgement of Receipt/Citation must be attached to the completed proof of service.
Attach Proof of Service on opposing party.
Correct Proof of Service: The party served is not a party to the action per the rejection for the
Amendment to Complaint that was processed on 7/14/2021. Also, the pleading that was submitted is not
needed , please resubmit the Judicial Form POS-010 without pleading. Please review.
Not appraised by the Probate Referee.
QO Order/Judgment does not conform to the Court minutes.
oO Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with
identifying information for order and case (short title case and case number).
Oo Dismissal cannot be entered for the following reasons:
Oo Other:
Tamarah Harber-Pickens
CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE.
ACCOMPANIED BY A SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE LARGE ENOUGH TO RETURN DOCUMENTS
Rev, 12/2017
By: Gina Sala _, Deputy Clerk
ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE LARGE ENOUGH TO RETURN DOCUMENTS
Rev, 12/2017
Envelope Details Page 1 of 2
rint this pag
Case # BCV-20-100473 - ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY VS PAVLETICH ELECTRIC &
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Clark, Thomas S.)
pee ——- a we oe — ——
c fo a
Location Kern - Bakersfield-Civil
Date Filed 7/21/2021 5:52 PM
Case Number BCV-20-100473
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY VS PAVLETICH
Case Description
ELECTRIC & COMMUNICATIONS, INC
Assigned to Judge Clark, Thomas S.
‘Attorney Emest Vargas
Firm Name web development test customer
FiledBy eet SS aee
Emily Bolter
pn eee
ee
Fees a a __]
Convenience Fee $0.25
Total Court Case Fees. $0.00
Total Court Party Fees $0.00
Total C
we
iling Fees $0.00
Tot Service Fees $0.00
Total Filing &8 Service Fees $3. 50
Total Pro’ ler Service Fees. ~ $0.00
Total ‘Provider Tax Fees $0.00
Total Taxes (for non- -court
$0.00
fees)
Grand Total atte ae
$3.75 —-
Payment
‘Account Name — DDS Legal e
Transaction Amount $3.75
Transaction Response | ~
Transaction ID 10708246
-
Order # - 006897649-
~ _ ——y
Proof o! of Summons/Complaint ween - wn - ~
Filing Type wane
EFile
Filing Code a
Proof of Service of Summons/Complaint
Motion Code _
Filing De
D scription Proof of Service of Summons Complaint
https://california.tylerhost.net/EnvelopeDetails.aspx?envelopeguid=42da] 8al-416e-4fff-b7. 7/21/2021
Envelope Details Page 2 of 2
Reference Number. ws
178595
Comments
ax
Status
= Soe sete . Rejected nae —
Fees ——— en aa J
Court Fee_ $0.00
Service Fee '$0.00
wan
Rejection Information a |
Reason ime Comment -
The party served is nota party to the action per the rejection for the
14- 7/21/2021 Amendment to Complaint that was processed on 7/14/2021. Also, the
Rejected 6:27 PM pleading that was submitted is not needed , please resubmit the Judicial Form
POS-010 without pleading. Please review.
Documents | — aoe — —
Lead Document 17859 “07.21.15
24 19-2.pdf riginal
https://california.tylerhost.net/EnvelopeDetails.aspx?envelopeguid=42da] 8al -416e-4fff-b7.... 7/21/2021
ERNEST A. VARGAS, ESQ. (State Bar #36623)
ROBERT A. VARGAS, ESQ. (State Bar #138806)
LAW OFFICES OF VARGAS & VARGAS
301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 120
Pasadena, California 91101-4108
(626) 440-1111 Fax (626) 440-9456
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
10
11 ZURICH AMERICAN INS NCE CASE NO. BCV20100473
COMPANY,
12 Plaintiff,
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
13 vs. & COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION
ON ARCO CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
14 PAVLETICH ELECTRIC & [ATTACHED]
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,et al/,
15
Defendants
16
7 AND RELATED CROSS acsgoxs
18
HUGO GOMEZ,
19
Complainant-in/Intervention,
20
vs
21
PAVLETICH ELECTRIC &
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DOES
1 to 50,
23
Defepdants-in-Intervention, )
24
TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT:
26 Attached find PROOF OF SERVICE on Defendant ARCO CONSTRUCTION
27 CcO., INC. of the Summons and Complaint-in-Intervention, Civil Case
28
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMON & Cousthtnr-IN- INTERVENTION ON ARCO
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
1 Cover Sheet, and Amendment to Complaint.
2] DATED: July 21, 2021 LAW OFFICES OF VARGAS & VARGAS
3
By:
Ernest A. Vargas
Attorneys for
Plaintiff-in-Intervention
Hugo Gomez
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Siete
Bar aumber, and ackiross) ‘FOR COURT
USE ONLY
|_ Emest A. Vargas, Esq. | SBN: 36623
Vargas & Var
‘301 N Lake Ave Ste 120 Pasadena, CA 911014108
‘TELEPHONENO..: (628) 440-1111 | FAX NO. (626) 440-0456 | E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona):
ATTORNEY FOR (Namo): Piainttt:
KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
‘STREET ADDRESS: 1415 TRUXTUN AVE,
(MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND zip CODE: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
BRANCH NAME: BAKERSFIELD
PLAINTIFF: Hugo Gomez ‘CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT: Pavietlch Electric & Communications, Inc, 8CV20100473
Ref. No. oF Fle No:
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Gomez V Pavietich
1. At the time of service | was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action.
2. | served copies of:
a. Ww Summons
b.oy Compiaint
Altemative Dispute Resolution (ADR) package
5 ow Case Cover Sheet (served in complex cases only)
Crose-complaint
ey ot rcify doc Ciy i. Caso Cover Sheet; Amendment to Complaint
Party served (specty ‘name
ni i gh10 on documents served):
Arco Construction Co., Inc. -Doe 1
vif Person (other than the arty in ts 3a) served on behalf of an entity or as an authorized agent (and not a person under
item 5b on whom ‘substit ice was made) (specify name and relationship to the party named in item 3a):
re jolutions, Inc.; George Caraveo - Communication Service Provider
Regis
Age 28900 ‘Welght: 175 Ibs Hair: Black ‘Sex: Male
Holght: 5'6" Eyes: Race: Hispanic
4, Address where the party
was served: 1220 S St Ste 150
Sacramento, CA 95811-7147
5.1 the party (check proper box)
by personal service. | personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to
receive service of process for the party (1) on (date): 7/16/2021 (2) at (time): 12:20 PM
b. oO by substituted service. On (date): at (time): | left the documents listed in item 2 with or
in the presence of (name and title or relationship to person indicatedin item 3b).
(1) o (business) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the office or usual place of business of the
person to be served. | informed him of her of the general natureof the papers.
@O (home) a competent member of the household (at least 18 years of age) at the dwelling house or usual place of
abode of the party. | informed him or her of the general nature of the papers.
@QO (physical address unknown) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the usual mailing
address of the person to be served, other than a United States Postal Service post office box. | informed him of
her of the general nature of the papers.
@O | thereafter mailed (by first-class, postage prepaid) copies of the documents to the person to be served at the
place where the copies were left (Code Civ. Proc., §415.20). | mailed the documents on
(date): from (city). a declaration of mailing is attached.
©) J attach dectaration of diligence stating actions taken firstto attempt personal service.
tot?
aa aifomia ‘Uso PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
‘Code of Cli Proceduro, § 417.10
(Rev, January 7, 2007), POS010-1/1760S7
PETITIONER: Hugo Gomez CASE NUMBER:
8CV20100473
RESPONDENT: Pavietich Electric & Communications, Inc,
c.L] by mail and acknowledgment of receiptof service. | mailed the documents listed in item 2 to the party, to the address
shown in item 4, by first-class mail, postage prepaid,
(1) on (date): (2) from (city):
(2) with two copies of the Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt and a postage-paid retum envelope addressed to me.
(Attach completed Notice and Acknowledgement of Receipt.) (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.30.
@0 to an address outside California with return receipt requested. (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.40.)
a0 by other means (specify means of service and authorizing code section):
1 Additional page describing service is attached.
The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the summons) was completed as follows:
a. as an individual defendant.
b. yw as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify): Arco Construction Co., Inc. -Doe 1
c. as occupant.
qd. On behalfof (specify): Arco Construction Co., Inc.
under the following Code of Civil Procedure section:
416.10 (corporation) QO 415.95 (business organization, form unknown)
0 416.20 (defunct corporation) Oo 416.60 (minor)
( 416.30 (joint stock company/association) oO 416.70 (ward or conservatee)
(] 416.40 (association or partnership) 416.90 (authorized person)
[1 416.50 (public entity) 415.46 (occupant)
o other:
Person who served papers
a. Name: Katrina Williams - DDS Legal Support
b. Address: 2900 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626
¢, Telephone number: (714) 662-5555
d. The fee for service was: $ 114.35
e. lam:
aa
(1) not a registered California process server.
(2) exempt from registration under Business and Professions Code section 22350(b).
(3) istered California pr S server:
(i owner employee of independent contractor.
(ii) Registration No.: 2015-10
(iii) County: Sacramento
8. of I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Califomia that the foregoing is true and correct,
or
9.0) tama California sheriff or marshal and | certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: 7/20/2021 wes
DDS Le: | Support cores
2900 Bristol Street
2a Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(714) 662-5555
www.ddslegal.com Fey
»
(NAME OF PERSON WHO SERVED PAPERSISHERIFF OR MARSHAL) (SIGNATURE)
POS.010
JRev January 1, 2007] Page 2of2
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
POS-010/176057
PROOF OF SERVICE
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
Tam employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of
18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 120.
10 Pasadena, California 91101-4108
11 On July 21, 2021, I served the foregoing documents described as:_PROOF O
SERVICE OF SUMMONS & COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION ON ARCO
12 ‘ONSTRUCTION CO.. INC., on all interested parties in said action by
13 [x] BY EMAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: Based on a Court Orderof an agreement
of the parties to accept service by email or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent
14 to the person(s) at the email address(es) listed above. | did not receive, within a reasonable time after
the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
15 [Rules of Court Rule 2056(a)(4).
16 Ms. Patricia Jean Wolfe, Esq.
Patricia obrienlaw,
17 755 Baywood Drive, Suite 185
Petaluma, California 94954
18
Mr. Patrick Quigley, Esq.
19 Mr. Canon Young, Esq
eyoung@mfrlegal.com
20 2151 Salvio Street #280
Concord, California 94520
21
) STATE- I declare under penalty and perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
22 foregoing is true and correct.
23 Executed on July 21, 2021, at Pasadena, California.
24
ERNEST ARGAS
25
26
27
28
Page 3
Preview
URT.O7 Me SUPERIOR COURT Tamarah Harber-Pickens Telephone 661-868-5393 Clerk of the Superior Court Se cas 1415 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield CA 93301 iB ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE Date 07/21/2021 COMPANY Case No.. BCV-20-100473 RETURNED VIA EFILE Case Name ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE ERNEST VARGAS COMPANY VS PAVLETICH ELECTRIC & COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Document: PROOF OF SERVICE The attached papers are being returned for the following reason(s): 1 Check # Returned This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. The attached document is an improper ex-parte communication and has not been considered by the Court. Fee of $, required or a Request to Waive Court Fees must be submitted. Application for Waiver of Fees missing attachment(s): CO Last three (3) paystubs, if employed. O Certified Copy of Statement of Account for previous six (6) months certified by Dept. of Corrections C1 Trust Account Withdrawal Order form (CDC form 193) completed by the Dept. of Corrections indicating $3.00 fee to Dept. of Corrections has been paid or insufficient funds in the account to cover. Does not conform to Rule 2.100-2.119, California Rules of Court, as to form and format. Superior Court case number is wrong, incomplete, or missing. Consolidated matter: All consolidated case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case listed first. Consolidated matter: Title is incorrect or missing parties. Summons does not conform to complaint/cross-complaint/petition. Not an original. Copies are not acceptable. Copies must be provided if endorsed copies are requested. Submit one original plus copy(ies). Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule/Code: Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. is not eligible for filing. Reason: Item(s) # incomplete. Missing required forms/attachment: Original Will must be presented at the time of filing petition. Signature missing: Date and place of execution not completed. Document(s) must be verified. Show date, time, and location of hearing pursuant to California Rules of Court. The date you have noticed this matter is a Court holiday/weekend. Acknowledgement of Receipt/Citation must be attached to the completed proof of service. Attach Proof of Service on opposing party. Correct Proof of Service: The party served is not a party to the action per the rejection for the Amendment to Complaint that was processed on 7/14/2021. Also, the pleading that was submitted is not needed , please resubmit the Judicial Form POS-010 without pleading. Please review. Not appraised by the Probate Referee. QO Order/Judgment does not conform to the Court minutes. oO Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short title case and case number). Oo Dismissal cannot be entered for the following reasons: Oo Other: Tamarah Harber-Pickens CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE. ACCOMPANIED BY A SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE LARGE ENOUGH TO RETURN DOCUMENTS Rev, 12/2017 By: Gina Sala _, Deputy Clerk ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE LARGE ENOUGH TO RETURN DOCUMENTS Rev, 12/2017 Envelope Details Page 1 of 2 rint this pag Case # BCV-20-100473 - ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY VS PAVLETICH ELECTRIC & COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Clark, Thomas S.) pee ——- a we oe — —— c fo a Location Kern - Bakersfield-Civil Date Filed 7/21/2021 5:52 PM Case Number BCV-20-100473 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY VS PAVLETICH Case Description ELECTRIC & COMMUNICATIONS, INC Assigned to Judge Clark, Thomas S. ‘Attorney Emest Vargas Firm Name web development test customer FiledBy eet SS aee Emily Bolter pn eee ee Fees a a __] Convenience Fee $0.25 Total Court Case Fees. $0.00 Total Court Party Fees $0.00 Total C we iling Fees $0.00 Tot Service Fees $0.00 Total Filing &8 Service Fees $3. 50 Total Pro’ ler Service Fees. ~ $0.00 Total ‘Provider Tax Fees $0.00 Total Taxes (for non- -court $0.00 fees) Grand Total atte ae $3.75 —- Payment ‘Account Name — DDS Legal e Transaction Amount $3.75 Transaction Response | ~ Transaction ID 10708246 - Order # - 006897649- ~ _ ——y Proof o! of Summons/Complaint ween - wn - ~ Filing Type wane EFile Filing Code a Proof of Service of Summons/Complaint Motion Code _ Filing De D scription Proof of Service of Summons Complaint https://california.tylerhost.net/EnvelopeDetails.aspx?envelopeguid=42da] 8al-416e-4fff-b7. 7/21/2021 Envelope Details Page 2 of 2 Reference Number. ws 178595 Comments ax Status = Soe sete . Rejected nae — Fees ——— en aa J Court Fee_ $0.00 Service Fee '$0.00 wan Rejection Information a | Reason ime Comment - The party served is nota party to the action per the rejection for the 14- 7/21/2021 Amendment to Complaint that was processed on 7/14/2021. Also, the Rejected 6:27 PM pleading that was submitted is not needed , please resubmit the Judicial Form POS-010 without pleading. Please review. Documents | — aoe — — Lead Document 17859 “07.21.15 24 19-2.pdf riginal https://california.tylerhost.net/EnvelopeDetails.aspx?envelopeguid=42da] 8al -416e-4fff-b7.... 7/21/2021 ERNEST A. VARGAS, ESQ. (State Bar #36623) ROBERT A. VARGAS, ESQ. (State Bar #138806) LAW OFFICES OF VARGAS & VARGAS 301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 120 Pasadena, California 91101-4108 (626) 440-1111 Fax (626) 440-9456 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN 10 11 ZURICH AMERICAN INS NCE CASE NO. BCV20100473 COMPANY, 12 Plaintiff, PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS 13 vs. & COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION ON ARCO CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 14 PAVLETICH ELECTRIC & [ATTACHED] COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,et al/, 15 Defendants 16 7 AND RELATED CROSS acsgoxs 18 HUGO GOMEZ, 19 Complainant-in/Intervention, 20 vs 21 PAVLETICH ELECTRIC & COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DOES 1 to 50, 23 Defepdants-in-Intervention, ) 24 TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT: 26 Attached find PROOF OF SERVICE on Defendant ARCO CONSTRUCTION 27 CcO., INC. of the Summons and Complaint-in-Intervention, Civil Case 28 PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMON & Cousthtnr-IN- INTERVENTION ON ARCO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 1 Cover Sheet, and Amendment to Complaint. 2] DATED: July 21, 2021 LAW OFFICES OF VARGAS & VARGAS 3 By: Ernest A. Vargas Attorneys for Plaintiff-in-Intervention Hugo Gomez 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Siete Bar aumber, and ackiross) ‘FOR COURT USE ONLY |_ Emest A. Vargas, Esq. | SBN: 36623 Vargas & Var ‘301 N Lake Ave Ste 120 Pasadena, CA 911014108 ‘TELEPHONENO..: (628) 440-1111 | FAX NO. (626) 440-0456 | E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): ATTORNEY FOR (Namo): Piainttt: KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ‘STREET ADDRESS: 1415 TRUXTUN AVE, (MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND zip CODE: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 BRANCH NAME: BAKERSFIELD PLAINTIFF: Hugo Gomez ‘CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT: Pavietlch Electric & Communications, Inc, 8CV20100473 Ref. No. oF Fle No: PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Gomez V Pavietich 1. At the time of service | was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action. 2. | served copies of: a. Ww Summons b.oy Compiaint Altemative Dispute Resolution (ADR) package 5 ow Case Cover Sheet (served in complex cases only) Crose-complaint ey ot rcify doc Ciy i. Caso Cover Sheet; Amendment to Complaint Party served (specty ‘name ni i gh10 on documents served): Arco Construction Co., Inc. -Doe 1 vif Person (other than the arty in ts 3a) served on behalf of an entity or as an authorized agent (and not a person under item 5b on whom ‘substit ice was made) (specify name and relationship to the party named in item 3a): re jolutions, Inc.; George Caraveo - Communication Service Provider Regis Age 28900 ‘Welght: 175 Ibs Hair: Black ‘Sex: Male Holght: 5'6" Eyes: Race: Hispanic 4, Address where the party was served: 1220 S St Ste 150 Sacramento, CA 95811-7147 5.1 the party (check proper box) by personal service. | personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive service of process for the party (1) on (date): 7/16/2021 (2) at (time): 12:20 PM b. oO by substituted service. On (date): at (time): | left the documents listed in item 2 with or in the presence of (name and title or relationship to person indicatedin item 3b). (1) o (business) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the office or usual place of business of the person to be served. | informed him of her of the general natureof the papers. @O (home) a competent member of the household (at least 18 years of age) at the dwelling house or usual place of abode of the party. | informed him or her of the general nature of the papers. @QO (physical address unknown) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the usual mailing address of the person to be served, other than a United States Postal Service post office box. | informed him of her of the general nature of the papers. @O | thereafter mailed (by first-class, postage prepaid) copies of the documents to the person to be served at the place where the copies were left (Code Civ. Proc., §415.20). | mailed the documents on (date): from (city). a declaration of mailing is attached. ©) J attach dectaration of diligence stating actions taken firstto attempt personal service. tot? aa aifomia ‘Uso PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS ‘Code of Cli Proceduro, § 417.10 (Rev, January 7, 2007), POS010-1/1760S7 PETITIONER: Hugo Gomez CASE NUMBER: 8CV20100473 RESPONDENT: Pavietich Electric & Communications, Inc, c.L] by mail and acknowledgment of receiptof service. | mailed the documents listed in item 2 to the party, to the address shown in item 4, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, (1) on (date): (2) from (city): (2) with two copies of the Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt and a postage-paid retum envelope addressed to me. (Attach completed Notice and Acknowledgement of Receipt.) (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.30. @0 to an address outside California with return receipt requested. (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.40.) a0 by other means (specify means of service and authorizing code section): 1 Additional page describing service is attached. The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the summons) was completed as follows: a. as an individual defendant. b. yw as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify): Arco Construction Co., Inc. -Doe 1 c. as occupant. qd. On behalfof (specify): Arco Construction Co., Inc. under the following Code of Civil Procedure section: 416.10 (corporation) QO 415.95 (business organization, form unknown) 0 416.20 (defunct corporation) Oo 416.60 (minor) ( 416.30 (joint stock company/association) oO 416.70 (ward or conservatee) (] 416.40 (association or partnership) 416.90 (authorized person) [1 416.50 (public entity) 415.46 (occupant) o other: Person who served papers a. Name: Katrina Williams - DDS Legal Support b. Address: 2900 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 ¢, Telephone number: (714) 662-5555 d. The fee for service was: $ 114.35 e. lam: aa (1) not a registered California process server. (2) exempt from registration under Business and Professions Code section 22350(b). (3) istered California pr S server: (i owner employee of independent contractor. (ii) Registration No.: 2015-10 (iii) County: Sacramento 8. of I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Califomia that the foregoing is true and correct, or 9.0) tama California sheriff or marshal and | certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: 7/20/2021 wes DDS Le: | Support cores 2900 Bristol Street 2a Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 662-5555 www.ddslegal.com Fey » (NAME OF PERSON WHO SERVED PAPERSISHERIFF OR MARSHAL) (SIGNATURE) POS.010 JRev January 1, 2007] Page 2of2 PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS POS-010/176057 PROOF OF SERVICE PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) Tam employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 120. 10 Pasadena, California 91101-4108 11 On July 21, 2021, I served the foregoing documents described as:_PROOF O SERVICE OF SUMMONS & COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION ON ARCO 12 ‘ONSTRUCTION CO.. INC., on all interested parties in said action by 13 [x] BY EMAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: Based on a Court Orderof an agreement of the parties to accept service by email or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent 14 to the person(s) at the email address(es) listed above. | did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. 15 [Rules of Court Rule 2056(a)(4). 16 Ms. Patricia Jean Wolfe, Esq. Patricia obrienlaw, 17 755 Baywood Drive, Suite 185 Petaluma, California 94954 18 Mr. Patrick Quigley, Esq. 19 Mr. Canon Young, Esq eyoung@mfrlegal.com 20 2151 Salvio Street #280 Concord, California 94520 21 ) STATE- I declare under penalty and perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 22 foregoing is true and correct. 23 Executed on July 21, 2021, at Pasadena, California. 24 ERNEST ARGAS 25 26 27 28 Page 3