arrow left
arrow right
  • CHIARI-MCCARTHY, CHERYL v. HOYOS, EDGARDO Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
  • CHIARI-MCCARTHY, CHERYL v. HOYOS, EDGARDO Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
  • CHIARI-MCCARTHY, CHERYL v. HOYOS, EDGARDO Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
  • CHIARI-MCCARTHY, CHERYL v. HOYOS, EDGARDO Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CASEFLOW REQUEST STATE OF CONNECTICUT CSFLREQ JD-CV-118 Rev. 1-16 SUPERIOR COURT www jud.ct.gov ALTA Instructions 1. Fill out all sections and file with the court. Note: if the request is granted, the court will try to schedule the 2. File at least 3 days before the date of the scheduled event. event for the requested date. However, if that date is not available, it will be scheduled for the next available date. ‘Name of case (First-named plaintiff v. First-named defendant) Cheryl Chiari-McCarthy v. Edgardo Hoyos Judicial District of Date of request Date of scheduled event (if applicable) New Haven 01/11/2024 02/19/2024 Wame of Judge who scheduled the event (if applicable) Docket number Judge Kevin J. Murphy NNH_ CV 21 - 6117634 (8) Requested Action ("X” box(es) that apply and give reason(s) for request below) Cd Status Conference on or about: Date CJ Client/adjuster to be available by phone for scheduled on Event Date (1 Pretrial on or about Date Cd Party to be excused from scheduled on Event Date [x] Other: Defendants" request that the Hearing on Motion for Order recently set for February 19, 2024 be rescheduled. Reason(s) for request: Defendants request that the hearing on motion for order of compliance be moved to a different (and earlier) date. Defendants’ counsel has.a preplanned vacation on Feb 19. In addition, trial is scheduled for March 19, 2024 and defendants require the interrogatory answers which the motion for order seeks. well in advance of trial in order to obtain records from providers that Plaintiff's supplemental answers to interrogatories may identify. — _ or | agree to notify my client and all counsel of record and self-represented parties whether the requested action is granted denied, and if granted, the specific ruling of the court. | have told all counsel and self-represent ed parties of record that | would be asking for the requested action. All Counsel and Self-represented Parties: (J Consent [x] Do not consent to the action requested above Signed NDI Zoey ‘Name of altorney and juris number or self-represented party (Print or type) Patrick J. Markey 435739 The person requesting the action is the: (J Plaintiff (J Defendant (J Attorney for Plaintiff [x] Attorney for Defendant Firm name (If applicable) ‘Address Telephone number (with area code) Markey Barrett, P.C. 360 Bloomfield Avenue Ste 830, Windsor, CT 860-607-3265 of record. A | certify that a copy of the above was mailed or delivered on the date shown below to all counsel and self-represented parties sheet is attached listing the name and address of each party the copy was mailed or delivered to. Signed a, = = 01/11/2024 Order Requestis Signed (Judge) Date (1) Granted {_] Denied ADA NOTICE The Judicial Branch of the State of Connecticut complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you need a reasonable accommodation in accordance with the ADA, contact a court clerk or an ADA contact person listed at www.jud.ct.gov/ADA/ Weber & Rubano, LLC, 401 Center Street, Wallingford, CT 06492