On February 08, 2017 a Hearing was filed involving a dispute between Autozone Parts, Inc., Dorman Products, Inc., Idsc Holdings, Llc, Mitchell Repair Information Company, Llc, Mountain View Tire & Service, Inc., North Coast Bearings, Llc, Rb Distribution, Inc., Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Donnelly, Dylan, and Autozone, Inc., Autozone Parts, Inc., Dorman Products, Inc., Eastwood Garage, Inc., Mcmahon'S Rv Superstore, Inc., Mitchell, Trey, Mountain View Tire & Service, Inc., North Coast Bearings Llc, Pleasure-Way Industries Ltd, Donnelly, Dylan, North Coast Bearings, Llc, Pleasure-Way Industries, Ltd., Rb Distribution, Inc., Roes 1 Through 100, for PI personal injury not MV in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
July 08, 2019
February 08, 2017
PI personal injury not MV
Closed
ANGLIN FLEWELLING RASMUSSEN CAMPBELL & TRYT Attorney
Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell &Trytten Attorney
Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell &Trytten Attorney for the Defendant
AUTOZONE INC Erroneously Sued As
AUTOZONE, INC. Defendant
AutoZone Parts, Inc. Cross Appellant In 1st X-appeal
AutoZone Parts, Inc. Respondent
AUTOZONE PARTS, INC Cross Defendant
AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. Cross Complainant
AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. Cross Defendant
AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. Defendant
CONV Conversion Event
DELAWARE MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC Doing Business As
Donnelly, Dylan Cross Respondent In 1st X-appeal
Donnelly, Dylan Respondent
DONNELLY, DYLAN Plaintiff
Dorman Products, Inc. Cross Respondent In 1st X-appeal
Dorman Products, Inc. Respondent
DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. Cross Complainant
DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. Cross Defendant
DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. Defendant
EASTWOOD GARAGE, INC Cross Defendant
EASTWOOD GARAGE, INC. Defendant
Friedenthal, Heffernan & Brown, LLP Attorney
Friedenthal, Heffernan & Brown, LLP Attorney for the Defendant
Haight Brown & Bonesteel Attorney
Haight Brown & Bonesteel Attorney for the Defendant
Hall Huguenin LLP Attorney for the Defendant
IDSC HOLDINGS, LLC Cross Complainant
IDSC HOLDINGS, LLC Cross Defendant
London Fischer LLP Attorney
LONDON FISCHER LLP Attorney
LONDON FISCHER LLP Attorney for the Appellant
Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP Attorney
Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP Attorney for the Defendant
MATHENY SEARS LINKERT & JAIME LLP Attorney
MATHENY SEARS LINKERT & JAIME LLP Attorney for the Defendant
MCMAHON'S RV SUPERSTOE,INC, AUTOZONE PARTS , INC, DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC NORTH COAST BEA Cross Defendant
MCMAHON'S RV SUPERSTORE, INC. Defendant
MITCHELL Doing Business As
MITCHELL1 Doing Business As
MITCHELL 1 Doing Business As
MITCHELL 1 ONLINE Doing Business As
MITCHELL 1 REPAIR INFORMATION COMPANY, LLC Doing Business As
MITCHELL 1 REPAIR ONLINE Doing Business As
MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC Cross Defendant
MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. Cross Defendant
MITCHELL REPAIR INFORMATION COMPANY, LLC Cross Complainant
MITCHELL REPAIR INFORMATION COMPANY, LLC Cross Defendant
MITCHELL REPAIR INFORMATION COMPNY, LLC Cross Defendant
MITCHELL, TREY Defendant
MOES 1 THROUGH 100 Cross Defendant
MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE & SERVICE, INC Cross Defendant
MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE & SERVICE, INC. Cross Complainant
MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE & SERVICE, INC. Defendant
Murchison & Cumming Attorney
Murchison & Cumming Attorney for the Defendant
North Coast Bearings, LLC Cross Respondent In 1st X-appeal
North Coast Bearings, LLC Respondent
NORTH COAST BEARINGS LLC Defendant
NORTH COAST BEARINGS, LLC Cross Complainant
Panish Shea & Boyle Attorney
Panish Shea & Boyle Attorney for the Plaintiff
Pleasure-Way Industries, Ltd. Cross Respondent In 1st X-appeal
Pleasure-Way Industries, Ltd. Respondent
Pleasure-Way Industries, LTD Cross Respondent In 1st X-appeal
PLEASURE-WAY INDUSTRIES LTD Cross Defendant
PLEASURE-WAY INDUSTRIES LTD Defendant
PLEASURE-WAY INDUSTRIES, LTD Cross Defendant
RB Distribution, Inc. Cross Respondent In 1st X-appeal
RB Distribution, Inc. Respondent
RB DISTRIBUTION, INC. Cross Complainant
RB DISTRIBUTION, INC. Cross Defendant
Roes 1 through 100 Respondent
ROES 1 THROUGH 100 Cross Defendant
ROES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE Cross Defendant
Selman Breitman LLP Attorney
Severson & Werson Attorney
Severson & Werson Attorney for the Defendant
SEVERSON & WERSON Attorney
SNAP-ON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC. Cross Defendant
SNAP-ON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (SYNCATA), INC. Cross Defendant
SNAP-ON DIAGNOSTICS Cross Defendant
SNAP-ON DIAGNOSTICS Doing Business As
SNAP-ON EQUIPMENT, INC. Cross Defendant
SNAP-ON, INCORPORATED Cross Defendant
SNAP-ON LOGISTICS COMPANY Cross Defendant
SNAP-ON SECURECORP, INC. Cross Defendant
SNAP-ON TECHONOLOGIES, INC. Cross Defendant
SYNCATA CORPORATION Cross Defendant
Twin City Fire Insurance Company Appellant
Twin City Fire Insurance Company Cross Respondent In 1st X-appeal
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Cross Complainant
Wade & Lowe Attorney for the Defendant
Daniel Dunbar Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Brian Panish Attorneys for Plaintiffs
William Dunbar Attorney
Gary Smith Attorneys for Defendants
Kevin Heffernan Attorney
Richard Miller Attorneys for Defendants
Paul Stephan Attorney
Alexander Behar Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Sevan Gobel Attorney
Alexander Barna Attorney
James Kahn Attorney
Richard Endres Attorney
Nicholas Davila Attorney
Peter Dubrawski Attorney
Sharon Collier Attorneys for Defendants
John Wilkerson Attorney
Leslie Fales Attorneys for Defendants
Bruce Cleeland Attorney
Elizabeth Handelin Attorneys for Defendants
Patrick Bollig Attorneys for Defendants
Daniel Friedenthal Attorney
Kerry Franich Attorneys for Defendants
Jonathan Slipp Attorneys for Defendants
Anthony Ellrod Attorney
Daniel Reardon Attorney
Taline Bazaz Attorney
Robert Rosvall Attorneys for Defendants
John Griffin Attorneys for Defendants
Kathleen Heffernan Attorneys for Defendants
Daniel Ip Attorney
Brian Hannemann Attorney
Daniel Wessner Attorney
Sharon Corda Attorney
Matthew Pero Attorney
John Wilson Attorney
Jonathan So Attorneys for Defendants
Todd Sorrell Attorney
Daniel Friedman Attorneys for Defendants
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
y 1 D ni l R Friedenthal Esq S ate Bar Nc 136847 Kevin N Heffernar Esq St e Sar No I 39128 OR C 2 FR1E ENTHAL HEFFERNAN BRt7WN E LF S COU OSq BERNAF J SAM1I E p IAR I dO DISTf2fCT 215 North Mar ngca P venue Suite 6 5 3 2019 Pasadena Californ ra s a7 JU Og 4 1 e ephc ete 626 628 800 Facsimile 626 628 282 BY LAURA BRUCK DEPUN 6 Attcrrneys for Defendant Cross E efendant and Cross Complainant DORMAN PRODUCTS iNC and Crflss Compl ir it and Crass Defendant RB 7 DISTRIBUTIt N IN L g SUPE I4R Ct7URT t3F THE STATE 4F CAL Ft RNlA i C 3UNTY iJF SAN BERNAF2DIN0 1 l 12 DYLAlV DC7Nt ELLY CASE NO CIV DS 1762333 3 Flainfiff REPLY TCl t3PPO StTIOM TO IV10T10N 14 NTESTING APPLICATE4N F R ETERMfNATtON OF Ot7a FAlTH 15 ETTLEMENT OF CRC S C EFENDANT Mt UNTAIN VIE1N TtRE SERUICE 6 INC MEMORANQUM QF PfltNTS AND 17 vs AUTHORlTIES 1 19 20 2 EAST1i1lOC D GARAGE fNC MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE S RVICE 1NC P EASUR VIIAY 1NDUSTRIES LTD McM HON S RV SUPER TORE INC TREY MITC HELL and DOES 1 throu h Q0 inclusive 4 Qate July 11 2019 Oefendants Time 8 30 a m 2 Dept S 33 26 AND RELATEQ CRCISS ACTIC NS 27 on Filed February 8 2Q17 Trial Dafe Ju v 15 2f119 28 1 REPLY Tt3 OFPL SII I TCl MOTl4N CdJNTESTING AF PLtCAT10N OR L7ETERNtINAT1UN F G4QC1 Fi41TH 5ET T MEN OF Ci2pSS NDANT MC3UNTAIN VI W 1 iRE SER ICE ING MEMC R INDUM aF Pt1INTS AND AUTHpRtT1ES 2 3 1 NIDUNTAIN VIEW FAILS TO SUBMlT ANY EVI DENCE TfJ SUPPORT THE 4 APPLICATI N F4R aETERM NATIt N pF GpC C1 FAlTH SETT EMENT 5 Mountain ew Tire Servic Inc I IQuntain View chose not td file a motion 6 with aceompa r ying evidence and dec rati ns suppor ing its claim that the purparted 7 settlernent was in good faith lnste d M untain View simply ed an pplication tha 8 merely recited the terms of the a leged settlement As the court in ify of G and 9 Terrac Superior Court v 1987 19 Cal App 3d 1 1 9261 noted such a 10 bareb nes appiicatian is permitt d When how ver as here anather party contes s 11 the goc d faith of t e settlement it is up to the settling party to present admissible 12 e ridence l at settlement was in goad faith 13 Tt ese contes ting parties have submitted evidence thr u h the deposition 14 Veew testimony af Mountain s c un person mast knov ledgeabl indicatin g hat 15 Mc untair View performed work on he sub ect vehicle plaintiff was trav ling in ju st a 16 fe v wre ks prior fio the inci fent giuirrg rise ta the litigation The witness testified that 17 Mountain View a professional vehic e repair shop relied entirely upc n wh t they were 18 tQlct by a ay vehicle owner regarel ng any problern with the ve icle and rtever 19 aerforrr er any in p ctiori hernselves Adtl itional y Mountain View wa s supposed to 20 test drive vehicles both befare a nd after service ta insure that there was na issue with 21 the v hie e but failed fo do so in fihe case of plaintiff s vehicle Finally Ilountain 22 View s witness admitted that the lug nuts on the r ar tir and anrheel were 23 overtightened at the time of senrice by Mounfairi View 24 Ctnce a party provides evidence regarding the settlor s liabilify it is up to the 25 se flor to submit evidence that fihe settlemen was in fact in good f ith ity of Grand 26 Terrac supra 192 CaI App 3d at 62 27 Here Mauntain View does neit submi any evidence whatsaever Instead 28 Maunt in Vi w s attarn ys simply ma e argurnents in fhe memprandum of painfis and 2 REPLYTO flPPQSlT10N TO NC 1TIt N Cd1UTE TlNG APR ICATIQN FCOR DETERM 1NATICIN QF GC7QD tITH SETTLEM NT OF CRO S DE EN ANT Mt Utdl Alt VI W TiRE SERVIGE lNC