arrow left
arrow right
  • DYLAN DONNELLY -V- EASTWOOD GARAGE, ETA AL Print Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • DYLAN DONNELLY -V- EASTWOOD GARAGE, ETA AL Print Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • DYLAN DONNELLY -V- EASTWOOD GARAGE, ETA AL Print Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • DYLAN DONNELLY -V- EASTWOOD GARAGE, ETA AL Print Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Law Offices of MATHENY SEARS LINKERT TAIME LLP 2 JEFFREY E LEVINE ESQ SBN 255862 SUPERI COURT OF D IFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3 3638 American River Drive SAN BERNARDINO DtSTRICT 3 Sacramento California 95864 Telephone 916 9 I8 3434 MAR 2 2 2018 4 Facsimile 916 978 3430 5 Attorneys for Defendant NORTH COAST LISETTE ORTEGA bEPUTY BEARINGS LLC sued and served herein as DOE 3 6 7 8 SUF ERIOR COURT OF TNE STATE OF CALIFORNI 9 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO a 10 i 11 DYLAN DONNELLY Case No CIVDS1702333 i I o 12 Plaintiff j t SSIGNED TO JUDGE MICHAEL A w SACHS FOR ALL PURPOSES DEPT 28 UY 2z 13 V j LL JvU t 14 EAS TWOOD GARAGE iNC ANSWER TO COMPLAINT gQ a MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE SERVICE N 15 INC PLEASURE WAY INDUSTRIES z LTD MCMAHON S RV SUPERSTORE Q 16 INC TREY MITCHELL and DOES 1 through lOQ j G r f 17 r Defendants 18 19 20 COMF S NOW defendant NORTH COAST BEARINGS LLC sued and served herein as 21 DOE 3 and in answer to plaintiff s complaint on file herein admits denies and alleges as follows 22 I 23 GENERAL DENIAL 24 Answering each and every paragraph in said cornplaint and each and every paragraph of 25 each cause of action of said complaint this answering defendant denies the same both generally 26 and specifically each and every allegation therein contained and deny that plaintiffs were or will 27 be damaged in the sum or sums alleged or in any sum whatsoever ar at all 28 1 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT iI 1 1 II 2 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 3 Failure to State a Cause of Action 4 AS AND FOR A FURTHER SEPAR ATE AND DISTINCT ANSWER AND DEFENSE 5 to plaintiff s complaint on file herein this answering defendant alleges that plaintiff s complaint 1 6 fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a or any cause of action against this answering defendant 7 III 8 SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 9 Comparative Fault a 10 AS AND FOR A FURTHER SEPARATE AND DISTINCT ANSWF R AND DEFENSE u 11 to plaintiff s complaint on file herein this answering defendant is informed and beiieves and 12 thereon alleges that at the time and place of the accident in question plaintiffs were guilty of o v o OJVU zza 13 carelessness and negligence in and about the matters and things set forth in plaintiff s complaint g W Z 14 that said carelessness and negligence on plaintiff s own part proximateiy caused and eontributed to w N 15 the happening of the accident in question and the resultant alleged injuries and damage to plaintiffs z N 16 if any I 17 IV 18 THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSF i 19 Comparative Fault Unknown Third Party 20 AS AND FOR A FURTHER SEPARATE AND DTSTINCT ANSWER AND DEFENSE 21 to plaintiff s complaint on file herein and to each and every purported cause of action cantained 22 therein this answering defendant alleges that at the time and place of the events described in 23 plaintiff s complaint persons and entities as yet unknown to this answering defendant were 24 careless negligent in breach of contract in breach of fiduciary duty in breach ofwarranty express 25 ar implied strictly liable and or otherwise legally at fault in and about the matters and things alleged 26 in plaintiff s complaint which comparative negligence breach of contract breach of fiduciary duty 27 breaeh of warranty strict liability andlor other legal fault proximately caused or contributed to the 28 injuries and damages complained of if any there were or are and that liability should be r 2 ANSWEIt TO COiVIPLAINT f