arrow left
arrow right
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, et al  vs.  TRT HOLDINGS, INC., et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-21-11406 MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LEASING LLC, § and 635 GRAVOIS ROAD REAL § ESTATE, LLC, § § Plaintiffs, § 44th JUDICIAL DISTRICT § v. § § TRT HOLDINGS, INC., RBR REAL § ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, BRIAN § ZELMAN, and ADAM ZEITSIFF, § § Defendants. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES, AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES, AND MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT, AND FINAL JUDGMENT This case was called to trial November 6, 2023, and all parties appeared and announced ready for trial. Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Milton 635 Gravois Road, LLC, 635 Gravois Road Leasing, LLC, and 635 Gravois Road Real Estate, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) appeared through their counsel of record. Defendants TRT Holdings, Inc., Brian Zelman, and Adam Zeitsiff, and Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff RBR Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Defendants”) appeared through their counsel of record. After a jury was impaneled and sworn on November 6, 2023, the jury heard evidence and arguments of counsel through and including November 16, 2023. At the conclusion of the evidence and arguments by counsel, and after the submission of the Jury Charge to the Court, the jury rendered its findings on November 16, 2023, which the Court received and filed, and which are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. Based on RBR Real Estate Holdings, LLC’s (“RBR”) Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Expenses, and Expert Witness Fees, and Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (“Motion”), the responses thereto, and the arguments of counsel, the Court hereby orders the Motion is GRANTED. Therefore, and based on the evidence presented at trial, the jury’s verdict, and the legal and equitable powers of this Court, the Court further ORDERS: 1. Plaintiffs take nothing; 2. RBR shall recover from Plaintiffs its attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses in the amount of $1,580,591.50 that it reasonably and necessarily incurred in this suit, including and through trial of this suit: i.e., $1,180,669.50 in attorneys’ fees, $122,964.41 in costs and expenses, and $276,957.59 in expert witness fees; 3. RBR shall also recover the reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees associated with the Moton in the amount of $7,500; and 4. If Plaintiffs appeal and Defendants prevail, Defendants shall also recover from Plaintiffs the reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees in the following amounts: $150,000 for representation in the Court of Appeals; $50,000 for representation at the petition for review stage before the Supreme Court of Texas; $50,000 for representation at the merits briefing stage in the Supreme Court of Texas; and $50,000 for representation through oral argument and the completion of proceedings in the Supreme Court of Texas. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that RBR is entitled to recover from Plaintiffs its: ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT 2 1. Reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses in the amount of $1,580,591.50 incurred through the trial of this suit, and upon appeal, the amounts set forth above in paragraph 3; 2. Reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees associated with the Moton in the amount of $7,500.00; and 3. Post-judgment interest at the rate of 8.50%, compounded annually, from the date the Final Judgment is signed until all amounts are paid in full. All relief not expressly granted in this Final Judgment is denied. This Final Judgment finally disposes of all parties and all claims and is appealable. SIGNED __________________________, 2024. _______________________________ Hon. Veretta L. Frazier Presiding Judge, 44th District Court ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT 3 r r. . . TE; .' "-v ‘ ORIGINAL CAUSE NO. DC-21-11406 E Em ‘ §§§§§ MILTON 635 GRAVOIS ROAD LLC, N y: EL: RT.6tfDU my EM “TRTQv'fiT-E‘au GRAVOIs ROAD LEASING LLC, 635 GRAVOIS LLc, and 635 GRAVOIS ROAD REAL ESTATE MN 66 2023 WM 2923 LLC LLC, r RWRE 3A PETRE IA DA AS CO. TEXAS A3 CO. 1 DiS CLE Dig 5.5 . . ’ DEPUTY ”DEPUTY if / §§§§§§§§§ Plaintiffs, I VS. VS- 44TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 'TRT TRT HOLDINGS, INC., |NC., RBR REAL ESTATE ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, BRIAN ZELMAN,' ZELMAN, and ADAM ZEITSIFF, ZEITSIFF, Defendants. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS CHARGE OF THE COURT MEMBERS OF THE JURY: After the closing closing arguments, arguments, you you will gogo to the jury jury room to decide the case, answer the questions that are attached, and reach a verdict. You may may discuss the case case with other jurors only the'Jjury discuss jurors only when you you are all together together"in In the ury room. Remember my my previous instructions: Do not discuss the casecase with anyone anyone else, either in person person or by by any any other means. Do not do any independent investigation any independent investigation about the casecase or conduct any any research. Do not look up any up any words in dictionaries or on the Internet. Do not post post information about the case case on the Internet. Do not share any any special knowledge or experiences with the other jurors. Do not use your otherjurors. phone or your phone any any other electronic device during during your your deliberations for deliberations’for any any reason. I will | give you you a number where others may contact you you in case case of an emergency. Any Any notes you you have taken are for your your own personal personal use. You may may take your your notes back into the jury jury room and consult them during during deliberations, but do not show or read your your notes to your your fellow jurors jurors during your during your deliberations. Your notes are not evidence. Each of you you should rely rely on your independent independent recollection of the evidence and not be influenced by by the fact that another juror has or has not taken notes. anotherjuror You must leave your your notes with the bailiff when you you are not deliberating. deliberating. The bailiff will give your your notes to me promptly promptly after collecting collecting them from you. you. Il will make sure your your notes are kept kept in a safe, secure location location. and not disclosed to anyone. anyone. After you you complete your your deliberations, the bailiff will collect your your notes. When you you are released from jury duty, the jury duty, bailiff will promptly promptly destroy your your notes so that nobody nobody can read what what you you wrote. Here are the instructions for answering answering the questions. EXHIBIT 1. Do not let bias, prejudice, prejudice, or sympathy sympathy play play any any part part in your your decision. A CHARGE OF THE COURT PAGE 1 1 OF 13 13 2. Base your only on the evidence admitted in court and on the law that your answers only any evidence questions. Do not consider or discuss any is in these instructions and questions. that was not admitted in the courtroom. 3. You are to make up your own minds about the facts. You are the sole judges up your judges credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the credibility weight to give testimony. But on give their testimony. matters of law, you you must follow all of my my instructions. 4. If If my ordinary meaning, way that is different from its ordinary my instructions use a word in a way meaning, meaning Il give use the meaning you, which will be a proper give you, proper legal legal definition. definition. 5. All of the questions important. No one should say questions and answers are important. say that any any question question or answer answer is not important. important. 6. Answer "yes" "no” to all questions “yes” or "no" you are told otherwise. questions unless you othen/vise. A "yes" “yes” preponderance of the evidence. Whenever a answer must be based on a preponderance answer question requires “yes” or "no," requires an answer other than "yes" “no,” your your answer must be based on a preponderance preponderance of the evidence. The term "preponderance evidence” means the greater "preponderance of the evidence" greater weight weight of credible evidence presented case. If presented in this case. lf you you do not find find that a preponderance preponderance of the evidence supports a "yes" supports “yes” answer, then answer "no." “no.” A preponderance preponderance of the evidence is not measured by by the number of witnesses or by by the number of documents admitted in evidence. For a fact to be proved proved by by a preponderance preponderance of the evidence, you you must find that the fact is more likely likely true than not true. A fact may may be established byby direct evidence or by by circumstantial evidence or both. A fact is established by by direct evidence when proved by by documentary documentary evidence or by by witnesses who saw the act done or heard the words spoken. spoken. A fact is established byby circumstantial evidence when it may may be fairly fairly and reasonably reasonably inferred from other facts proved. proved. 7. Do not decide who you you think should win before you you answer the questions questions and then just just answer the questions questions to match your decision. your decision. Answer each question carefully carefully without considering considering who will win. Do not discuss or consider the effect your your answers will have. 8. Do not answer questions questions by drawing straws or by by drawing by any any method of chance. 9. Some questions questions might might ask you you for a dollar amount. Do not agree agree in advance to decide on a dollar amount by by adding adding up up each juror’s juror's amount and then figuring figuring the average. average. 10. 10. Do not trade your your answers. For example, example, do not say, say, "I “l will answer this question question your way if your way you you answer another question my way." my way." 11. The answers to the questions questions must be based on the decision of at least ten of the twelve jurors. The same ten jurors jurors must agree agree on every every answer. Do not agree agree to be bound by by a vote of anything anything less than ten jurors, even jurors, even if it would be a majority. majority. 0F THE COURT CHARGE OF 0F 13 PAGE 2 OF 13 12. If If you you want to communicate with me at any any time during during your your deliberations, please give give a written message message or question question to the bailiff, bailiff, who will bring bring itit to me. I will then respond | respond as promptly promptly as possible either in writing writing or by by having having youyou brought brought into the courtroom so that Ilcan address you you orally. orally. I will | first disclose your questions and my my response to the attorneys attorneys before Il answer your question. question. As I have said before, if you l you do not follow these instructions, youyou will be guilty guilty of juror ofjuror misconduct, and Il mightmight have to order a new trial and start this process over again. This would waste your your time and the parties' parties’ money money and would require require the taxpayers taxpayers of this county county to paypay for another trial. If lf a juror breaks any juror any of these rules, tell that person person to stop stop and report report itit to me immediately. immediately. 0F THE COURT CHARGE OF 0F 13 PAGE 3 OF 13 GENERAL DEFINITIONS 1. 1. "Plaintiffs" Leasing LLC, PIaintiffs/Counter-Defendants 635 Gravois Road Leasing “Plaintiffs” means Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants and 635 Gravois Road Real Estate LLC. 2. "Leasing "Leasing LLC" "Gravois Leasing" means 635 Gravois Road Leasing “Gravois Leasing" Leasing LLC. 3. "Real Estate LLC" "Gravois Estate” means 635 Gravois Real Estate LLC. “Gravois Real Estate" 4. “RBR” refers to the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff "RBR" Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff RBR Holdings, Holdings, LLC. 5. “TRT” refers to Defendant TRT Holdings, "TRT" Holdings, Inc. 6. "Brian Zelman” refers to Defendant Brian Zelman. “Brian Zelman" 7. "Adam Zeitsiff” refers to Defendant Adam Zeitsiff. “Adam Zeitsiff' 8. “Defendants” refers collectively "Defendants" collectively to Defendants RBR, TRT, Brian Zelman, and Adam Zeitsiff. 9. "Contract" “Contract” refers to the parties' parties’ written contractual agreement agreement that is at issue in this lawsuit, the Agreement Agreement of Purchase and Sale, also known .as the PSA, PSA, dated MayMay 1, 1, 2019, and the amended contract, the First Amendment to Agreement Agreement of “APSA.” Purchase and Sale, also known as the "APSA." 10. "Premises" "Property" “Property” means 635 Gravois Road, Fenton, Missouri, the shopping shopping center at issue in this lawsuit. The Property Property included the space Gold’s Gym space that Gold's leased. CHARGE OF THE COURT PAGE 4 OF 13 13 QUESTION NO. 1 1 Did one of more of the Defendants named below commit common-law fraud against Leasing or Gravois Real Estate? against Gravois Leasing For this question, question, fraud occurs occurs when— 1. 1. a party party makes a material misrepresentation, misrepresentation, and 2. the misrepresentation misrepresentation is made with knowledge knowledge of its falsity falsity or made recklessly recklessly without any any knowledge knowledge of the truth and as a positive positive assertion, and 3. the misrepresentation is made with the intention that it should be acted on by by the party, party, and 4. the other party justifiably relies on the misrepresentation party justifiably misrepresentation and thereby thereby suffers injury. injury. "Misrepresentation" means a false statement of fact. A party's party's conduct includes inclUdes the conduct of another who acts with the party's party's authority authority of apparent authority. authority. Authority Authority for another to act for a party party must arise from the party's party's agreement that the other act on behalf and for the benefit of the party. party. If If a party party so authorizes another to perform perform an act, that other party party is also authorized to do whatever else is proper, prOper, usual, and necessary to perform necessary perform the act expressly expressly authorized. Apparent authority authority exists if a party party (1) (1) knowingly knowingly permits permits another to hold himself out as having authority authority or, or, (2) (2) through through lack of ordinary ordinary care, bestows on another such indications of authority authority that lead a reasonably reasonably prudent prudent person to rely rely on the apparent existence of authority authority to his detriment. Only Only the acts of the party party sought to be charged charged with responsibility responsibility for the conduct of another may may be considered in determining whether apparent authority. authority. “Yes” or "No" Answer "Yes" “No" as to each Plaintiff: For Gravois Leasing: Leasing: Answer as as to TRT Holdings, Holdings, Inc.: lnc.: 11No \10 Answer as to RBR Real Estate Holdings, Holdings, LLC: “‘0 rdo Answer as as to Brian Zelman: We VJe. CHARGE OF 0F THE COURT PAGE 5 OF or= 13 For Gravois Real Real Estate: Answer as as to TRT Holdings, Holdings, Inc.: lnc.: wo £510 ' Answer as as to RBR Real Estate Holdings, Holdings, LLC: 0 Na P ' Answer as to Brian Zelman: [yo CHARGE OF THE COURT PAGE 6 OF 13 13 If If you “Yes" to Question No. 1, you answered "Yes" 1, for any any of those named below, then answer answer Question No. 2. Otherwise, Othewvise, do not answer answer Question No. 2. QUESTION NO. 2 What sum of money, money, if any, any, if paid paid now in cash, would fairly fairly and reasonably compensate Gravois Leasing Leasing and Gravois Real Estate for their damages, damages, if any, any, that resulted from Defendants' fraud? In In answering answering questions about damages, damages, answer answer each question separately. separately. Do not increase or reduce the amount in one answer because of your your answer to any other question question about damages. damages. Do not speculate speculate about what any any party's party’s ultimate recovery recovery may may or may may not be. Any Any recovery recovery will be determined by by the court when it applies applies the law to your your answers at the time of judgment. Do not add any judgment. any amount for interest on damages, if any. any. Do not include in your your answer any any amount that you you find find Gravois Leasing Leasing and Gravois Real Estate could have avoided by by the exercise of reasonable care. Do not include in your your answer any any amount that you you find find was not the proximate cause of Defendants' cause Defendants’ fraud. "Proximate cause” means a cause that was “Proximate cause" was a substantial factor in bringing bringing about an event, and without which cause such event would not have occurred. In ln order to be a proximate cause, the act or omission complained complained of must be such such that a person person using the degree of care required required of him would have foreseen that the event, or some some similar event, might might reasonably reasonably result therefrom. There may may be more than one proximate causecause of an event event. "New and independent cause" means an act of a third person person or other force, not reasonably reasonably foreseeable, that destroys destroys the causal connection, if any, between the act or omission inquired inquired about and the injury injury in question and thereby thereby becomes the immediate cause of such injury. cause injUry. Consider the following following elements of damages, damages, if any, any, and none other: a. The difference, if any, any, between the value expended expended for the Property versus Property versus the value received for the Property Property in November 2019. Gravois Leasing: Leasing: Answer: $ Gravois Real Estate: Answer: $ CHARGE OF THE COURT PAGE 7 OF 13 13 Answer the following question regarding following question only if you regarding a defendant only unanimously answered you unanimously “Yes" to Question 1 "Yes" regarding that defendant. Otherwise, do not answer the following 1 regarding following question question regarding regarding that defendant. QUESTION NO. 3 What sum of money, money, if any, any, if paid paid now in cash, should be assessed against against Brian Zelman if you you answered “Yes” "Yes" to Brian Zelman on Question 1 1 and awarded to Gravois Leasing Leasing and Gravois Real Estate as exemplary exemplary damages, damages, if any, any, for the conduct found in response 1? response to Question 1? "Exemplary “Exemplary damages" damages" means any any damage damage awarded as a penalty penalty or by by way way of punishment but not for compensatory purposes. compensatory purposes. Factors to consider in awarding awarding exemplary damages, if any, exemplary damages, any, are— 1. The nature of the wrong. wrong. 2. The character of the conduct involved. 3. The degree degree of culpability culpability of Brian Zelman. 4. The situation and sensibilities of the parties parties concerned. 5. The extent to which such conduct offends a public sense of public sense justice and ofjustice propriety. propriety. ' 6. The net worth of each Brian Zelman. You are instructed that, in order for you you to find exemplary exemplary damages, damages, your answer to the question regarding regarding the amount of such damages damages must be unanimous. Any Any prejudgment prejudgment interest may may not be assessed or recovered on an award of exemplary exemplary damages. damages. Answer in dollars and cents, if any, any, only only for that Defendant you you unanimously “Yes” to in Question 1. answered "Yes" Answer for Brian Zelman: $ CHARGE OF 0F THE COURT 0F 13 PAGE 8 OF 13 QUESTION NO. 4 Did Plaintiffs fail to comply comply with the Contract: “Yes” or "No." Answer "Yes" “No.” Answer: y, $$ \[rf CHARGE OF THE COURT PAGE 9 OF 13 13 Instructions Regarding Instructions Regarding the Presiding Presiding Juror: 1. 1. When you you go jury room to answer the questions, go into the jury questions, the first first thing thing you you will needto need to do is choose a presiding juror. presiding juror. 2. The presiding juror has these duties: presiding juror a. have this complete complete charge charge read aloud if it will be helpful helpful to your your deliberations; b. preside preside over your your deliberations, meaning meaning manage manage the discussions, and see that you you follow these instructions; c. give give written questions questions or comments to the bailiff who will give give them to the judge; judge; d. write down the answers you you agree agree on; on; e. sign sign or get get the signatures signatures for the verdict certificate; certificate; and f. notify notify the bailiff that you you have have reached a verdict. Do you you understand the duties of the presiding juror? If presiding juror? lf you you do not, not, please please tell me now. CHARGE OF THE COURT PAGE 10 10 OF 13 13 Instructions for Signing Instructions S_igning the Verdict Certificate: 1. 1. You may may answer the questions question