arrow left
arrow right
  • Salazar -v- Martinez Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • Salazar -v- Martinez Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • Salazar -v- Martinez Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • Salazar -v- Martinez Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

V ORL3|NAL Cynthia Velasco, Esq. (SBN 306140) ‘2 GREENACRE LAW. LLP smamoa ccgutn'75r3mrom~ 700 Flower Street, Suite 1000 CguNgngSAryfofigmpéfio Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone(213) 785-3790 AUG 29 2023 Facsimile (909) 966-2950 cv@greenacre. law . OCmNQMhWN— BY mom rkg muzievuw Attorney for Plaintiff, Gerardo Salazar FAX SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO _. _. v—I GERARDO SALAZAR, an individual, Case No.2 CIVSBZZOO686 _. N Plaintiff, ._. DJ [PROPOSEBTORDER RE: MOTION TO ._. A vs. ENFORCE SETTLEMENT ._— U‘ FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ, an and DOES through 20, inclusive; individual; 1 Date: June 15. 2023 ON ..— Time: 8: 30 AM .— \l Defendants. Dept.: S-32 —- 00 —- 0 NO This motion of Plaintiff. Gerardo Salazar. an individual, (“Plaintiff“), for an order and N ~ entry ofjudgment enforcing the terms ofthe Settlement and Release Agreement and (“Settlement NN Agreement") executed by Plaintiff and Defendant. Francisco Javier Martinez, an individual N b) (“Defendant"). Plaintiff, on or around December 16, 2022 came on regularly before the Court Nh for hearing on ‘June 15, 2023 at 8:30 AM or as soon as thereafter. IQ UI The Court, having reviewed thc moving and opposing papers on Plaintiff s motion for 1. N0 order and entry ofjudgment enforcing the Settlement Agreement between Plaintiff and N \l Defendant in the instant action; and oral argument of counsel having been received by the Court. N 00 l {32090859} ORDER The Court finds, adjudges, and orders as follows: That the Motion of Plaintiffis GRANTED. That the parties entered into a valid, binding written agreement, the terms of which are OOOONONUIbDJNy— stated in the Settlement Agreement dated December l. 2023. and are formalized in a Settlement Agreement dated January 10, 2023. That moving pany has provided satisfactory evidence that Defendant has breached the Settlement Agreement and is therefore entitled to enforcement of the agreement pursuant to Code ofCivil Procedure Section 664.6. That the moving party has fully performed its obligations under the Settlement Agreement and is therefore entitled to enforcement of the agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6. Judgement shall forthwith bc entered pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, —~—._.—_._—_._— as follows: OONOU'I-hDJN— a. The real property commonly known as 1030 West 7'“ Stret, San Bemardino, California 9241 1 (“Subject Property") to be sold to Renovate Properties, LLC for $250,000.00 per the February 28, 2003, Purchase Agreement that the Panics signed. l9 b. Should the buyer. Renovate Properties, LLC, be unable or unwilling to purchase the Subject Property, the Subject Property to be immediately listed for sale by a third party realtor and sold to the highest bidder per Section 2c of the Settlement Agreement. c. Defendant. Francisco Martinez, to pay Plaintiff. Gerardo Salazar $1,487.50 for fees and costs associated with the Motion t0 Enforce Settlement per Section 12. 12 ofthe Settlement Agreement. The funds to be deducted from Defendant’s share of sale proceeds. // // 2 [WED] ORDER