On March 29, 2019 a
Hearing
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bell Motors Llc,
Metrogisticsllc,
Hernandez, Mayra,
Lopez, Francisco Escalera,
and
Alcala, David,
Bell Motors Llc,
Carmax Auto Superstores California, Llc A Business Entity Form Unknown,
Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. A Business Entity Form Unknown,
Melchor Autotransport, Inc.,
Melchor, Victor,
Metrogistics Llc,
for PI Motor Vehicle
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
i r
1 PARKER STANBURY LLP
444 South Flower Street
19th
2 Floor SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORPIiA
COUNTY OF SAN f3ERNARDlNO
Los Angeles CA 90071
SAN BERNARDIND DISTRICT
3 213 622 5124
213 622 4858 Fax
4
JUL 16 2020
JOHN D BARRETT JR SBN 70079
Attorneys for Defendant Cross Complainant
5 METROGISTICS LLC Y C
Sued and served as DOE 2 PAO E AN Z DEPUTY
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
11 FRANCISCO ESCALER A LOPEZ an CASE NO CIV DS 1909599
individual MAYRA HERNANDEZ an
12 individual and FRANCISCO ESCALERA METROGISTICS AMENDED
HERNANDEZ and through
a minor
by FORMAT IDENTICAL CONTENT
13 Guardian Ad Litem MAYRA HERNANDEZ
SEPARATE STATEMENT IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S
14 Plaintiffs
DISCOVERY MOTIONS FILED
vs
15 CONCUR RENTLY WTTH OBJECTION
DAVID ALCALA individual MELCHOR
an TO INADEQUATE NOTICE
16 AUTO TRANSPORT INC a business entry AMENDED FORMAT ELEVEN PAGE
form unknown CARMAX AUTO OPPOSITION AND DEFENSE
1 7 SUPERSTORES WEST COAST INC a
COUNSEL BARRETT S
business entity form unknown CARMAX
DECLARATION RE EXHIBITS
1g AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA LLC
DOCUMENTING PLAINTIFFS
a business entity form unknown and DOES 1
19 100 inclusive IMPROPER DELAY AND BAD FAITH
Defendants IN DISCOVERY
20
METROGISTICS LLC
DATE July 21 2020
2 TIME 10 00 a m
Cross Complainant DEPT 5 31
22 vs DATE RESERVED None
2 3 MELCHOR AUTO TRANSPORT INC Assigned for All Purposes to the Honorable
DAVID ALCALA CARMAX AUTO
Judge John M Pacheco Department 5 31
24 SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA LLC BELL
MOTORS LLS DBA AUTONATION
CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM AND FIAT Complaint Filed March 29 2019
2 5
NORTH PHOENIX and ROES 1 through 100 Trial Date None
2 6 inclusive
2 METROGISTICS AMENDED FORMAT I t
1CAL CONTENT SEPARATE STATEMENT IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S DISCOVER MOTIONS FILED CONCURRENTLY WiTH
2 g OBJECTION TO INADEQUATE NOTICE A1V1 I 1 I D FORMAT ELEVEN PAGE OPP SiTION AND
DEFENSE COUNSEL BARRETT S DECLARATiO RE EXHIBITS DOCUMENTING PLAINTTFFS
1MI Ii IPCI DELAY AIYD BAD FAITH IN x SCCD RY
1
C Users downeram AppData Local Microsoft Windows INetCache Content OutlookW9ROYGPY 7 16 2020 PLD AMD SEP STMT OPPO
DISC doc
m
S
1
2
1 T0 C lT EN T II AS B EN C ANG D
3
NLY FO NZAT I AS CHANG
4
5
6
7
8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
9
PAGE
lo
SUI ARY O ARGUI ENTS AGAINST l OT Ol S
1 FACTUAL AND LEGAL SUPPORT IS BEING PROVIDED e 7
12 2 MOTION BY MOTION BRIEFLY 7
13 a The requests for admission 7
b Form interrogatory 17 1 7
14
c Second request for production 8
15 d Six employee depositions with production requests 8
depositions 9
e Twenty nine
PMQ with production requests
16
l FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
18 ARE NOT S OWN TO E LOGICALLY OR LEGALLY
REQUIRE 9
19
3 DBA RESPONSE NO OBJECTION AS PLAINTIFFS ARGUE 9
2
4 NON PARTY SEPARATE PRIVATE COMPANY REQUESTS
PROPERLY OBJECTED Td 10
21
5 QUALIFYING LANGUAGE RESPONSES PERMITTED BY LAW 11
22
23 FURT IER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17 1
ARE NOT S OWN TO BE LEGALLY OR LOGICALLY
24
REQUIRED 12
25
6 WHAT ARE PLAINTIFFS DEMANDING 12
26 7 UTTER ABSURDITY RE ONE OF PLAINTIFFS FALSE CLAIMS 13
27 ME iZ I f C rL CON I EN3 jSFEPARA TE 8 FA lEIVFENT
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S DISCOVERY MOTIONS FILED CONCURRENTLY W1TH
2 g OBJECTION TO WADEQUATE NOTICE AMENDED FORMAT ELEVEN PAGE OPPOSITION AND
DEFENSE COUNSEL BARRETT S DECLARATION RE EXHIBITS DOCUMENTING PLAINTIFFS
IMPROPER DELAY AND BAD FAITH IN DISCOVERY
2
C 1Users downeramlAppData Local Microsoft Windows INetCache Content 0utlook A9ROYGPY 7 16 2020 PLD AMD SEP STMT OPPO
DISC doc
Document Filed Date
July 16, 2020
Case Filing Date
March 29, 2019
Category
PI Motor Vehicle
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
i r 1 PARKER STANBURY LLP 444 South Flower Street 19th 2 Floor SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORPIiA COUNTY OF SAN f3ERNARDlNO Los Angeles CA 90071 SAN BERNARDIND DISTRICT 3 213 622 5124 213 622 4858 Fax 4 JUL 16 2020 JOHN D BARRETT JR SBN 70079 Attorneys for Defendant Cross Complainant 5 METROGISTICS LLC Y C Sued and served as DOE 2 PAO E AN Z DEPUTY 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 11 FRANCISCO ESCALER A LOPEZ an CASE NO CIV DS 1909599 individual MAYRA HERNANDEZ an 12 individual and FRANCISCO ESCALERA METROGISTICS AMENDED HERNANDEZ and through a minor by FORMAT IDENTICAL CONTENT 13 Guardian Ad Litem MAYRA HERNANDEZ SEPARATE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S 14 Plaintiffs DISCOVERY MOTIONS FILED vs 15 CONCUR RENTLY WTTH OBJECTION DAVID ALCALA individual MELCHOR an TO INADEQUATE NOTICE 16 AUTO TRANSPORT INC a business entry AMENDED FORMAT ELEVEN PAGE form unknown CARMAX AUTO OPPOSITION AND DEFENSE 1 7 SUPERSTORES WEST COAST INC a COUNSEL BARRETT S business entity form unknown CARMAX DECLARATION RE EXHIBITS 1g AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA LLC DOCUMENTING PLAINTIFFS a business entity form unknown and DOES 1 19 100 inclusive IMPROPER DELAY AND BAD FAITH Defendants IN DISCOVERY 20 METROGISTICS LLC DATE July 21 2020 2 TIME 10 00 a m Cross Complainant DEPT 5 31 22 vs DATE RESERVED None 2 3 MELCHOR AUTO TRANSPORT INC Assigned for All Purposes to the Honorable DAVID ALCALA CARMAX AUTO Judge John M Pacheco Department 5 31 24 SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA LLC BELL MOTORS LLS DBA AUTONATION CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM AND FIAT Complaint Filed March 29 2019 2 5 NORTH PHOENIX and ROES 1 through 100 Trial Date None 2 6 inclusive 2 METROGISTICS AMENDED FORMAT I t 1CAL CONTENT SEPARATE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S DISCOVER MOTIONS FILED CONCURRENTLY WiTH 2 g OBJECTION TO INADEQUATE NOTICE A1V1 I 1 I D FORMAT ELEVEN PAGE OPP SiTION AND DEFENSE COUNSEL BARRETT S DECLARATiO RE EXHIBITS DOCUMENTING PLAINTTFFS 1MI Ii IPCI DELAY AIYD BAD FAITH IN x SCCD RY 1 C Users downeram AppData Local Microsoft Windows INetCache Content OutlookW9ROYGPY 7 16 2020 PLD AMD SEP STMT OPPO DISC doc m S 1 2 1 T0 C lT EN T II AS B EN C ANG D 3 NLY FO NZAT I AS CHANG 4 5 6 7 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 PAGE lo SUI ARY O ARGUI ENTS AGAINST l OT Ol S 1 FACTUAL AND LEGAL SUPPORT IS BEING PROVIDED e 7 12 2 MOTION BY MOTION BRIEFLY 7 13 a The requests for admission 7 b Form interrogatory 17 1 7 14 c Second request for production 8 15 d Six employee depositions with production requests 8 depositions 9 e Twenty nine PMQ with production requests 16 l FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION 18 ARE NOT S OWN TO E LOGICALLY OR LEGALLY REQUIRE 9 19 3 DBA RESPONSE NO OBJECTION AS PLAINTIFFS ARGUE 9 2 4 NON PARTY SEPARATE PRIVATE COMPANY REQUESTS PROPERLY OBJECTED Td 10 21 5 QUALIFYING LANGUAGE RESPONSES PERMITTED BY LAW 11 22 23 FURT IER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17 1 ARE NOT S OWN TO BE LEGALLY OR LOGICALLY 24 REQUIRED 12 25 6 WHAT ARE PLAINTIFFS DEMANDING 12 26 7 UTTER ABSURDITY RE ONE OF PLAINTIFFS FALSE CLAIMS 13 27 ME iZ I f C rL CON I EN3 jSFEPARA TE 8 FA lEIVFENT OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S DISCOVERY MOTIONS FILED CONCURRENTLY W1TH 2 g OBJECTION TO WADEQUATE NOTICE AMENDED FORMAT ELEVEN PAGE OPPOSITION AND DEFENSE COUNSEL BARRETT S DECLARATION RE EXHIBITS DOCUMENTING PLAINTIFFS IMPROPER DELAY AND BAD FAITH IN DISCOVERY 2 C 1Users downeramlAppData Local Microsoft Windows INetCache Content 0utlook A9ROYGPY 7 16 2020 PLD AMD SEP STMT OPPO DISC doc