arrow left
arrow right
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
  • N. J. S. an infant, by and through her Parent and Natural Guardian, Michele Sardo, and, Michele Sardo Individually v. West Seneca Central School District, West Seneca Central School District Board Of Education, West Senior High SchoolTorts - Other Negligence (Negligent Supervision) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 03/26/2021 01:43 02:45 PM INDEX NO. 805265/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 83 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023 03/26/2021 SUPREME COURT: SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF ERIE N.J.S. an infant, by by and and through through her her Parent Parent and Natural Guardian, MICHELE SARDO, Guardian, MICHELE SARDO, andand MICHELE MICHELE SARDO, SARDO, individually Plaintiffs Index Index No.: No.: 805265/2020 805265/2020 v. WEST SENECACENTRAL WEST SENECA CENTRAL SCHOOL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DISTRICT, WEST SENECACENTRAL WEST SENECA CENTRAL SCHOOL SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT VERIFIED VERIFIED ANSW ER ANSWER BOARD OF EDUCATIQN EDUCATION and and WEST SENIOR WEST SENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOL, Defendants v. WEST SENECA CENTRAL WEST SENECA CENTRAL SCHOOL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DISTRICT, WEST SENECA CENTRAL WEST SENECA CENTRAL SCHOOL SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION EDUCATION and and WEST SENIOR HIGH WEST SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Third-Party Plaintiffs v. Cl-lRYSTLER CHRYSTLER LEE LEE STORTZ, STORTZ, MICHAEL MICHAEL JAMES BARBARA ANNE STORTZ, BARBARA ANNE STORTZ, STORTZ, andand HEATHER THIBEALT THIBEALTa/k/aa/k/a HEATHER STORTZ, Third-Party Third-Party Defendants Defendants Third-Party Defendant, Heather I-leatherA. A. Thibeault Thibeault a/k/a a/k/a Hather Hather A. A. Stortz, Story, by by her her attorneys, attorneys, Marshall Marshall Dennehey Dennehey Warner Warner Coleman Coleman and Goggin and Bethany A. A. Blood, Blood,Esquire, Esquire, as as and for her Verified Verified Answer Answer to to the the Third-Pariy Third-Party Complaint, Complaint, upon upon information informationand and belief, belief,states as follows: states as follows: 1. I. Deny having knowledge or information information suftllcient sufficient to form form aa belief belief as as to the truth of of the allegations contained contained in in paragraphs paragraphs1,1,7,7,ofofthe theVerified Verified Complaint. Complaint. 2. Admit Admit the the allegations allegations contained contained in inparagraphs paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 16, 17, 18, of the Verified Complaint. 3. 3. Deny Deny each each and every allegation contained in in paragraphs paragraphs 8, 9, 10, l11, 1, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 15, 19,20, 20,21, 21,22,23, 24,25, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,27, 26, 27, 28, 28, 29, 30, 30,31, 31, 32, 33, 34, 34, 35, 35, 36, 36,37, 37,38, 38,39, 39,40,41, 42,43, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,45,47,48,49, 50, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50,51, 51,52, 52,53, 53,55, 55,56, 56,57, 57,58, 58,59, 59,60, 60,61,63, 61, 63,64, 64,65, 65,66, 66,67, 67,68, 68, 69, 69, 71, 71, 72, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 76, and and 77 77of ofthe Verified Complaint, as it calls for a legal conclusion. theVerified 1 of 8 FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 03/26/2021 01:43 02:45 PM INDEX NO. 805265/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 83 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023 03/26/2021 4. Deny Deny each and every each and everyallegation allegationof of the theThird-Party Third-Party Complaint that is not specifically specifically not not heretofore specifically admitted heretofore specifically admitted or denied. denied. 5. Deny each and every each and everyallegation allegation of of the the Third-Party Third-Party Complaint not not heretofore heretofore specifically specificallyadmitted admitted01` or denied. AND FOR A AS AND A FIRST CAUSE CAUSE OF OF ACTION ACTION 6. Deny Deny each each and every allegation contained in in paragraphs paragraphs 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, and 53 of and 53 of the the Third-Party Third-Party Complaint, as it calls for a legal conclusion. AND FOR A AS AND A SECOND SECOND CAUSE CAUSE OF OFACTION ACTION 7. Deny each Deny each and every every allegation allegationcontained containedininpa1'ag1'aphs 55,56, paragraphs 55, 56, 57. 57, 58, 58, 59, 60, and 61 of and 61 of the the Third-Party Third-Party Complaint, Complaint, as as it calls for a legal conclusion. AS AND FOR FOR A ATHIRD THIRDCAUSE CAUSEOF OFAQT_IO§_ ACTION 8. Deny Deny each each and every allegation contained in in paragraplis paragraphs 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, and 69 of and 69 of the the Third-Party Third-Party Complaint, as as itit calls for a legal conclusion. AND FOR AS AND FOR A A FOURTH F()URTH CAUSE CAUSE OF OF ACTION ACTION 9. Deny Deny each each and every allegation allegation contained contained in inparagraphs paragraphs 71, 71, 72, 72, 73, 73, 74, 74, 75, 75, 76 76 and 77 of the Third-Party Third-Palty Complaint, Complaint, as as itit calls calls for for a legal conclusion. AFFIRMATIVE AFFIRMATIVEDEFENSES DEFENSES. First First Affirmative AffirmativeDefense Defense 10. The incident, injuries injuries and and damages allegedly suffered by the Plaintiff damages allegedly Plaintiff were werecaused caused in whole or in in palt part by by the the culpable conduct and/or and/or omissions omissions of of the thePlaintiff Plaintiff herself, herself, including including negligence, assumption assumption of of the risk and contributory contributory negligence, negligence, and and were were not not caused caused by the negligence 01'culpable negligence or culpableconduct conductofofthis thisThird-Party Third-PaltyDefendant, Defendant,and andPlaintiff's Plaintiffs recovery, if if any, should be barred or be barred or reduced reducedaccordingly. accordingly. 2 2 of 8 FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 03/26/2021 01:43 02:45 PM INDEX NO. 805265/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 83 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023 03/26/2021 11. recoverable damages, The recoverable damages,ififany, any,should shouldbe bediminished diminishedpursuant pursuanttotoArticle Article 14-A 14-A of of the CPLR. Second Affirmative Defense Second Affirmative Defense 12. The Plaintiff, Plaintiff, ififshe shemay mayhave have sustained sustained any injuries injuries at at the the time time and and place, place, and upon the occasion occasion mentioned mentioned in in the the Complaint Complaint and and Third-Party Third-Pamy Complaint, Complaint, assumed therisk assumed the risk of of same under sustaining same underthe theconditions conditions and andcircumstances circumstancesthen thenexisting existingand andobvious. obvious. The recoverable damages, damages,ififany, any,should shouldbe bediminished diminishedpursuant pursuanttotoArticle Article 14-A 14-A of the the CPLR. Third Third Affirmative AffirmativeDefense Defense 13. This Third-Palty Third-PartyDefendant Defendant claims claims the the benefits and and applicability applicability of of the provisions contained within Article contained within Article 14 14 of of the CPLR. Fourth Fourth Affirmative AffirmativeDefense Defense 14. or more One O1` moreofofthe thecauses causesofofaction actionset setforth forthin in the the Complaint Complaint and and Third-Pa1"ly Third-Party Complaint Complaint are are not not viable viable based based upon the claims of of res res judicata, collateral collateral estoppel, estoppel, release, release, laches andall laches and all other other affirmative affirmative defenses provided for defenses provided for in in CPLR §3018. Fifth Fifth Affirmative AffirmativeDefense Defense 15. 111 theevent In the eventPlaintiff Plaintiffrecovers recoversaaverdict verdictor orjudgment judgment against against the theoriginal original Defendants, then said verdict Of' judgment must or judgment must be be reduced reducedpursuant pursuantto toCPLR CPLR §4545(c) by those amounts which have amounts which havebeen beenororwill, will, with with reasonable reasonablecertainty, certainty,replace replaceororindemnify indemnifyPlaintiff Plaintiff in in whole or in in palt, part, for forany any past past future future claimed claimed economic economic loss, loss, from fromany anycollateral collateralsource source such such as as insurance, social social security, Workers' Compensation security,Wo1'l