On November 13, 2023 a
Exhibit,Appendix
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
for GARNISHMENT AFT JUDGMENT
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
10/25/2013 11:23:34 AM 2013-12829¢ / Court: 113 Page 2/3
aa Noy
oe
Big, ries
1a
Da, Rigg
ee
CAUSE NO. 2013-12825
MPTS Ting
& vi Stew. O89
COMERICA BANK, a Texas Banking IN THE DISTRICT couRrer* Pony
Association, BI
Plaintiff,
v. 113" JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FORBES CONSTRUCTION, INC. and
JAMES THOMAS FORBES,
Defendants. BARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
FINAL JUDGMENT NUNC PRO TUNC
13, 2013, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment was heard. The
On September
parties appeared through counsel and announced ready. ‘The Court considered all papers filed by the
parties and the arguments of counsel.
Jn consideration of the foregoing, it is
Ordered that Plaintiff Comerica Bank is awarded judgment against Defendants Forbes
Construction, Inc. and James Thomas Forbes, jointly and severally, in the principal amount of
2013, in
$297,135.58 together with pre-judgment interest on such principal, through September 25,
the additional amount of $3,561.80. It is further
Ordered that Plaintiff have judgment against Defendants in the additional amount of
$6,000.00 as Plaintif?'s reasonable and necessary attorney fees, it is further
COidered that, in the event an appeal of this Judgment is taken to the Court of Appeals and this
Judgment is affirmed (and in that event only), Plaintiff shall recover the additional sum of $3,000,00
from Defendants as reasonable attorney fees on appeal. It is further
Ordered that, in the even this Judgment is affirmed by the Court of Appeals and is affirmed
following the grant of a Petition for Review in the Texas Supreme Court (and that event only),
attorney
Plaintiff shall recover the additional sum of $5,000.00 from the Defendants, as reasonable
fees incurred before the Supreme Court. It is further
Page 1
Final Judgment Nune Pre Tune REDDADE A'S MEMORANDUM
en1S Of poe quality
atthe tine afm
713-755-1451 Page 3/3
10/25/2013 11:23:34 AM
ts. it is further
Ordered that all costs of court incurred hercin shall be taxed against Defendan
awarded jn this judgment at
Ordered that post-judgment interest shall aecrue on the amounts
3(c), beginning September 26,
the rate of five percent (5%) por annum per Tex. Fin. Code §304,00
2013 until paid in full.
‘This judgment disposes of all claims, and is final and appealable.
sicnen THIS Z_ day of AAepecenbige”_, 2013.
Me
NOV 1 1 2013
Mt Slee
FUDGE PRESY DING
3
Page 2
Final Judgment Nune Pre Tunc
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: J J
V. CHARLES SERAFINO
VINCENT LOPEZ SERAFINO JENEVEIN, PC
1661 ELM STR) ff 'T, SUITE 4100
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
332999
Abstract of Judgment Page 5 of §
FILED FOR RECORD
8:00 AM
NOV 21 2013
County Clerk, Harris County, Texas
eee Ce
THE STATE OF ToS
aN ain
ie eoet
ts FLD Fs Natta Siquaes os Re 88 a a Ba
aglaw arch nnaaintoostaben ates
NOV 21 2013
$3
Se COUNTY CLERK
HAMRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
Document Filed Date
November 13, 2023
Case Filing Date
November 13, 2023
Category
GARNISHMENT AFT JUDGMENT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
10/25/2013 11:23:34 AM 2013-12829¢ / Court: 113 Page 2/3 aa Noy oe Big, ries 1a Da, Rigg ee CAUSE NO. 2013-12825 MPTS Ting & vi Stew. O89 COMERICA BANK, a Texas Banking IN THE DISTRICT couRrer* Pony Association, BI Plaintiff, v. 113" JUDICIAL DISTRICT FORBES CONSTRUCTION, INC. and JAMES THOMAS FORBES, Defendants. BARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS FINAL JUDGMENT NUNC PRO TUNC 13, 2013, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment was heard. The On September parties appeared through counsel and announced ready. ‘The Court considered all papers filed by the parties and the arguments of counsel. Jn consideration of the foregoing, it is Ordered that Plaintiff Comerica Bank is awarded judgment against Defendants Forbes Construction, Inc. and James Thomas Forbes, jointly and severally, in the principal amount of 2013, in $297,135.58 together with pre-judgment interest on such principal, through September 25, the additional amount of $3,561.80. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff have judgment against Defendants in the additional amount of $6,000.00 as Plaintif?'s reasonable and necessary attorney fees, it is further COidered that, in the event an appeal of this Judgment is taken to the Court of Appeals and this Judgment is affirmed (and in that event only), Plaintiff shall recover the additional sum of $3,000,00 from Defendants as reasonable attorney fees on appeal. It is further Ordered that, in the even this Judgment is affirmed by the Court of Appeals and is affirmed following the grant of a Petition for Review in the Texas Supreme Court (and that event only), attorney Plaintiff shall recover the additional sum of $5,000.00 from the Defendants, as reasonable fees incurred before the Supreme Court. It is further Page 1 Final Judgment Nune Pre Tune REDDADE A'S MEMORANDUM en1S Of poe quality atthe tine afm 713-755-1451 Page 3/3 10/25/2013 11:23:34 AM ts. it is further Ordered that all costs of court incurred hercin shall be taxed against Defendan awarded jn this judgment at Ordered that post-judgment interest shall aecrue on the amounts 3(c), beginning September 26, the rate of five percent (5%) por annum per Tex. Fin. Code §304,00 2013 until paid in full. ‘This judgment disposes of all claims, and is final and appealable. sicnen THIS Z_ day of AAepecenbige”_, 2013. Me NOV 1 1 2013 Mt Slee FUDGE PRESY DING 3 Page 2 Final Judgment Nune Pre Tunc AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: J J V. CHARLES SERAFINO VINCENT LOPEZ SERAFINO JENEVEIN, PC 1661 ELM STR) ff 'T, SUITE 4100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 332999 Abstract of Judgment Page 5 of § FILED FOR RECORD 8:00 AM NOV 21 2013 County Clerk, Harris County, Texas eee Ce THE STATE OF ToS aN ain ie eoet ts FLD Fs Natta Siquaes os Re 88 a a Ba aglaw arch nnaaintoostaben ates NOV 21 2013 $3 Se COUNTY CLERK HAMRIS COUNTY, TEXAS