arrow left
arrow right
  • LISA HILL V QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC. Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • LISA HILL V QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC. Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • LISA HILL V QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC. Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • LISA HILL V QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC. Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

SCALI RASMUSSEN, PC ELECTRONICALLY FILED (Aut< >) J. Scali, Esq. (SBN 193785) Christian SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFC RNIA cscali@scalilaw.com COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN o Julie S. Pearson, Esq. (SBN 183043) 10/1 9/2023 4:06 PM jpearson@scalilaw.com 300 South Grand Ave., Suite 2750 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213.239.5622 Facsimile: 213.239.5623 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 11 LISA HILL, an individual, on behalf of herself, Case N0. CIVDS 1 826573 the proposed c1ass(es), all other similarly 12 situated, and 0n behalf 0f the general public CLASS ACTION 13 Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr. Dept: S32 14 vs. DEFENDANT AND CROSS- ScaliRasmussejj 15 QUAID HARLEY—DAVIDSON, INC, a COMPLAINANT QUAID HARLEY- California corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, DAVIDSON INC.’S NOTICE OF RULING 16 inclusive, 17 Defendant. Complaint Filed: October 5, 201 8 FAC Filed: March 4, 2019 18 QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC, a SAC Filed: May 22, 2019 California corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, X-Complaint Filed: May 28, 2021 19 inclusive, SACC Filed December 7, 2022 20 Cross—Complainant, 21 vs. 22 HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., a Wisconsin corporation, and DOES 1 23 through 10, inclusive. 24 25 26 27 28 -1- DEFENDANT AND CROSS-COMPLAINANT QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON INC.’S NOTICE OF RULING {00317157.1} TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: Defendant and Cross Complainant Quaid Harley-Davidson, Inc.’s Ex Parte Application t0 Continue the Hearing Date on Plaintiff’ s Motion For Summary Adjudication And To Continue Trial came on for hearing 0n October 19, 2023 at 8:30 am, in Department S32 of the above-entitled Court located at 247 West Third Street, San Bemardino, California 9241 5, before the Honorable Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr., presiding. Julie S. Pearson, Eq. and John Swanson, Esq. 0f Scali Rasmussen PC, appeared on behalf of Defendant and Cross-Complainant Quaid Harley-Davidson, Inc. (“Quaid”). Ross Hyslop, Esq. of Pestotnik LLP appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Lisa Hill and Abi Gnanadesigan, Esq. appeared on 10 behalf of Cross—Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. :AF 11 Following oral argument, the Court ordered as follows: ’ 'h’ 12 1. Quaid’s Ex Parte Application To Continue The Hearing Date On Plaintiff’s Motion :"jf ” 13 for Summary Adjudication and to Continue Trial is denied without prejudice to renewal and/or to {a IF .‘. 14 asserting its grounds for continuance in its opposition t0 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary ScaliRasmussen ,§# 15 Adjudication. 16 Dated: October 19, 2023 SCALI RASMUSSEN, PC 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _ 2 _ DEFENDANT AND CROSS-COMPLAINANT QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON INC.’S NOTICE OF RULING {00317157.1}