arrow left
arrow right
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
  • RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC vs CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

Russell F. Rowen, SBN 058178 Darin T. Judd, SBN 160475 Eric D. McFarland, SBN 214245 David Truong, SBN 306830 THOMPSON, WELCH, SOROKO & GILBERT LLP 3950 Civic Center Drive, Suite 300 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: (415)448-5000 Facsimile: (415)448-5010 Email: rrowen@twsglaw.com Email: eric@twsglaw.com Email: david@twsglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF'SONOMA RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2,LLC, Case No. SCV267840 a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF' RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 2, LLC PROPOSED v. SPECIAL JURY INSTRUCTION CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE Date:November 17,2023 COMPANY and DOES l-7, Time:8:30am Defendants. Department: 17 -l- PLAINTIF'F RMB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS z,LLC PROPOSED SPECIAL JURY INSTRUCTION SPECIAL #1 The plaintiffis entitled to be paid for any loss arising from any increased period to be paid for any loss arising from any increased period required to repair or reconstruct the property to comply with the minimum standards of any ordinance or law, in force at any time of the loss, that regulates the construction or repair, or requires the tearing down of any property no matter how long it takes to complete the rebuild. Insurance policy; Judge DeMeo's Statement of Decision dated December l, 2021 SPECIAL #2 Section 26-82-040 of the Sonoma County Code of Ordinances sets forth the authority of the County of Sonoma to determine the requirements for the approval of building permits, zoning permits and land use. Subsection (a) is tilted Con-rpliance and states as follows: No building permit, zoning permil nor land use approval shall be issued in any zoning district v,here this article is applicable until the preliminary aqsJfinal development plun(s) have been approved by the planning director rtr other applicable decision ntaking body. The planning departntent shall not authorize.final builtiing inspection or any level o.f occttpancy o.;f the building(s) until satis"fied that: all on-site improvements shown on lhe grading and ulility drav,ings are installed or bonded.for in accordance v,ith the sile plan approt ed by the design review committee: the buildings are constrtrcted in accordctnce v,ith the illustrative building elevation drav,ings, material samples and color samples approved by the design review committee; the landscaping and lcrndscape irrigation $tstem cu'e installed or bonded.for in accordance u,ith the drav,ings approved by the design reviev, board and that all conditions of'approval are mel. SPECIAL #3 Section 26-82-040 of the Sonoma County Code of Ordinances sets forth the authority of the County of Sonoma to determine the requirements for the approval of building permits, zoning permits and land use. Subsection (a) is tilted Compliance and states as follows: No building permit, zoning perntit nor land use approval shall be issued in any zoning district where this article is applicable unlil the prelintinury and.final development plan(s) have been approved by the planning director or other crpplicable decision rnaking body. The planning department shall not authorize Jinal building inspection or any level of occupancy of the building(s) until satis.fied that: all on-site improvement,s shou,n on the grading and utilily dyavtings are ins{alled or bonded.for in accordance v,ith the site plan approved by the design reviev, committee; the buildings cu'e constructed in accordance with the illustra.tive Sv;16inf elet:ation drawings, material scrmples und color samples approved by the design reviev, committee ; the landscaping and landscape inigation system are installed or bonded for in accordance with the clrawings approved by the design review board and that all conditions o.f approt,al qre ntel SPECIAL #4 The insurance company is not entitled to claim any defense to the plaintiff's claim for the increased period of restoration which is not in its August 7 ,2020 letter. Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 10, section 2695.7